SIze and weight of fighters
SIze and weight of fighters
Ive noticed this long time ago. When you look at UFC cards, you have majority of guys with 170, 185, or even 205 lbs. On the other side, boxing cards are full of lightweights, featherweights, bantamweight and flyweights. Seeing guys bigger than 160 lbs is not so common in boxing, in UFC they are many. Personally, i have no problem watching small guys but i can imagine it is one of the reasons why casual boxing fans switching to mma.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Yes, personally I like seeing fighters above 147. I especially like LHW where there seems to be a good balance of skill and power.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Most casual fans are probably not all that aware of the weight categories.
Especially the huge differences between boxing weights and mma weights (welterweight in mma is more like light heavy in boxing).
Especially the huge differences between boxing weights and mma weights (welterweight in mma is more like light heavy in boxing).
-
macademics
- Lightweight
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 14 Feb 2018, 08:42
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
There's too many weight classes IMO, especially at the lower end where there's only 1 or 2kg between classes. Do we really need 4 weight classes between 48 and 52kg? Does 1kg make 'that'much of a difference?
At the other end I think the opposite. The jumps are all 2-3.5kg, until you get to LHW to CW, where the jump is suddenly 12kg.
At the other end I think the opposite. The jumps are all 2-3.5kg, until you get to LHW to CW, where the jump is suddenly 12kg.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Of course, you are right in this. But that is not the problem i was talking about. In MMA card, from 10 fights you have 7 fights with guys with at least 155 weightclass. In boxing card , it is common from 10 fights you have 7 fights under 140 lbsVerdi wrote: ↑18 Jan 2020, 07:20 There's too many weight classes IMO, especially at the lower end where there's only 1 or 2kg between classes. Do we really need 4 weight classes between 48 and 52kg? Does 1kg make 'that'much of a difference?
At the other end I think the opposite. The jumps are all 2-3.5kg, until you get to LHW to CW, where the jump is suddenly 12kg.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Its not that there are so many weight classes in boxing, it is the fact that there are so many belts for each class that bothers me, and hurts the sport.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Agreed.
There are too many weight divisions but the multitude of "world titles" per division is a much bigger problem.
I never have to explain the weight classes to anyone but it's tough to avoid the " how many belts are there" question and impossible to argue the inevitable " that's why boxing is dying" comment.
The sanctioning bodies who create the belts are not the problem.
The fighters who fight for random belts when it's convenient are the problem.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Sorry, I went off on a bit of a tangent there...Cent0089 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2020, 07:27Of course, you are right in this. But that is not the problem i was talking about. In MMA card, from 10 fights you have 7 fights with guys with at least 155 weightclass. In boxing card , it is common from 10 fights you have 7 fights under 140 lbsVerdi wrote: ↑18 Jan 2020, 07:20 There's too many weight classes IMO, especially at the lower end where there's only 1 or 2kg between classes. Do we really need 4 weight classes between 48 and 52kg? Does 1kg make 'that'much of a difference?
At the other end I think the opposite. The jumps are all 2-3.5kg, until you get to LHW to CW, where the jump is suddenly 12kg.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Boxing is a global sport that has been established for more than. century, including having paid and amateur ranks.
By comparison, the UFC is a relatively recent phenomena, where the competitors for this MMA organisation are predominantly from North or South America.
So there’s a huge disparity, globally-speaking, for the available amount of elite-calibre competitors per weight class.
By comparison, the UFC is a relatively recent phenomena, where the competitors for this MMA organisation are predominantly from North or South America.
So there’s a huge disparity, globally-speaking, for the available amount of elite-calibre competitors per weight class.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Going off from what EO has said - I wonder what % of boxers are Americans. Whether predominantly boxers are non-Americans as differentiated from the UFC and whether these non-Americans are generally smaller compared to Americans. Maybe smaller sized people has some correlation to impoverished countries and ones that box.
Just a thought. Most athletic and bigger types in the USA tend to get into other more popular sports but this could be also said of everyone in the world. The more athletic types get into more popular sports, which is not boxing it seems.
Just a thought. Most athletic and bigger types in the USA tend to get into other more popular sports but this could be also said of everyone in the world. The more athletic types get into more popular sports, which is not boxing it seems.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39237
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Does the UFC actually have weight classes covering the whole size spectrum? They are an org not a sport and they don't have to show many little guys if they don't want to. TBH, even a lot of 'hardcore' fans still diss the small guys with nonsense like 'even I could beat them up' or 'I won't watch guys half my weight fight'
At least with the women's MMA they show dudes can get off and stuff
At least with the women's MMA they show dudes can get off and stuff
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
boxingfan5101 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 02:36There are two excellent heavyweight fighters, Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury. Both are respectable people outside the ring, inside well... we'll find out soon enough what the results are. Everyone talks crap about Deontay Wilder for swinging for the fences but guess what... he's accurate isn't he? Look at the record closely. Ironically, everyone talks about Tyson Fury getting knocked down twice.... against who?Cent0089 wrote: ↑18 Jan 2020, 05:20 Ive noticed this long time ago. When you look at UFC cards, you have majority of guys with 170, 185, or even 205 lbs. On the other side, boxing cards are full of lightweights, featherweights, bantamweight and flyweights. Seeing guys bigger than 160 lbs is not so common in boxing, in UFC they are many. Personally, i have no problem watching small guys but i can imagine it is one of the reasons why casual boxing fans switching to mma.
At Wilder being respectable
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Early clubhouse leader for bizarre post of the year.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Why?Heretic wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 03:32boxingfan5101 wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 02:36
There are two excellent heavyweight fighters, Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury. Both are respectable people outside the ring, inside well... we'll find out soon enough what the results are. Everyone talks crap about Deontay Wilder for swinging for the fences but guess what... he's accurate isn't he? Look at the record closely. Ironically, everyone talks about Tyson Fury getting knocked down twice.... against who?![]()
![]()
![]()
At Wilder being respectable![]()
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Most americans are heavyweight, when in reality they should be middleweights
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
The UFC's best division is 155 and it's not close.
-
james5000+
- Middleweight
- Posts: 78
- Joined: 18 Apr 2014, 21:55
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
205 always seemed to be the premier division until Jones started dominating it
155 is just a manlet division, filled with 5ft7 wrestlers
155 is just a manlet division, filled with 5ft7 wrestlers
-
BeetleBailey
- Heavyweight

Re: SIze and weight of fighters
This.
I saw one non sports website discuss how Conor Mac bulked up through his UFC career from 145 to 170.
The reality is that he never gained weight, he simply stopped cutting weight.
I chuckle at the state of modern journalism.
-
BeetleBailey
- Heavyweight

Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Been saying this for years.
We are an obese nation. Therefore, we follow sports where big people dominate: football and basketball.
I stopped watching baseball once short stops hit 200lbs.
-
BeetleBailey
- Heavyweight

Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Which is why it's awesome.
Not too many sports in the US where manlets can make a decent paycheck.
Khabib vs. Jordan Burroughs....please.
-
BeetleBailey
- Heavyweight

Re: SIze and weight of fighters
The alphabelts like it. That just,means,more sanctioning fees for them.Verdi wrote: ↑18 Jan 2020, 07:20 There's too many weight classes IMO, especially at the lower end where there's only 1 or 2kg between classes. Do we really need 4 weight classes between 48 and 52kg? Does 1kg make 'that'much of a difference?
At the other end I think the opposite. The jumps are all 2-3.5kg, until you get to LHW to CW, where the jump is suddenly 12kg.
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
"I want to kill someone in the ring"
"look how hard I hit" Line up a mascot...
"Look I can even beat mentally challenged people" Line up Zelenoff...
The guy is a fornicating idiot. Hard to respect that
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Re: SIze and weight of fighters
Sounds like your definition of respectable is bit different than mine