Who are the *worst placed? Best placed? Any tells as to what fights might come of certain positionings?
*Ignoring Oquendo as we know there's some legal stuff going on there
Discuss...
Who are the *worst placed? Best placed? Any tells as to what fights might come of certain positionings?
Always the case. Folks here don't like the WBC because of Wilder being champ. childish.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 17:48 The wbc is by far the best set. First off fury is the #1 guy and they're the only one that rates him. None of their 15 is outlandish being ranked.
Oh.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 18:26 What's the matter is the sad childishness that the WBC wrongfully suffers at the hands of boxing fans who so berate them while praising all other sanctioning bodies, particularly the WBA and their ruler, Fres Oquendo.
My problem with WBC recently at heavyweight is there mandatorys., not wilder being the champ. stivern rematch, breazeal, lack of whyte. currently there rankings are by far the best. but that dosent matter unless they get the mandatory correct.oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 18:14Always the case. Folks here don't like the WBC because of Wilder being champ. childish.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 17:48 The wbc is by far the best set. First off fury is the #1 guy and they're the only one that rates him. None of their 15 is outlandish being ranked.
Fair statement Greg.gregregegg wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 21:19My problem with WBC recently at heavyweight is there mandatorys., not wilder being the champ. stivern rematch, breazeal, lack of whyte. currently there rankings are by far the best. but that dosent matter unless they get the mandatory correct.
Not that any of the other belts have been better.
F*ck Yeah!
I would think they don’t rate him because he’s about to challenge for the WBC belt?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 17:48 The wbc is by far the best set. First off fury is the #1 guy and they're the only one that rates him. None of their 15 is outlandish being ranked.
Why? As I've said I pay no attention anymore but I've never heard of that.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 05:48I would think they don’t rate him because he’s about to challenge for the WBC belt?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑19 Jan 2020, 17:48 The wbc is by far the best set. First off fury is the #1 guy and they're the only one that rates him. None of their 15 is outlandish being ranked.
That has been the rule between the main 4 ABCs for a long time now. The reason is they want 15 available names so anyone on suspension or matched with another belt holder is deemed not eligible to be ranked. As soon as they have fought the losing fighter would most likely be ranked again in the next months ratings.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 06:09Why? As I've said I pay no attention anymore but I've never heard of that.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 05:48
I would think they don’t rate him because he’s about to challenge for the WBC belt?
Lennox wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 07:32That has been the rule between the main 4 ABCs for a long time now. The reason is they want 15 available names so anyone on suspension or matched with another belt holder is deemed not eligible to be ranked. As soon as they have fought the losing fighter would most likely be ranked again in the next months ratings.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 06:09
Why? As I've said I pay no attention anymore but I've never heard of that.
makes perfect sense to me from their point of view.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 07:44Lennox wrote: ↑20 Jan 2020, 07:32 That has been the rule between the main 4 ABCs for a long time now. The reason is they want 15 available names so anyone on suspension or matched with another belt holder is deemed not eligible to be ranked. As soon as they have fought the losing fighter would most likely be ranked again in the next months ratings.that's hysterical.