Post Your Scorecards

DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by DrDuke »

I don't remember the exact score, but I scored it for Barrera.
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Duran1970 »

Very good fight
I had it 116-112 JMM
7-4-1
Jay Nadi misses the clear knockdown in the seventh..if ruled correctly that would've been a 9-8 round for Barrera..even still i would've had Marquez winning by 1...
And yes, HBO announcers pro Barrera.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Woldemar wrote: 30 Jan 2020, 18:23 1978-10-26 Alfonso Zamora vs Alberto Sandoval

1. Zamora 10-9
2.Zamora 10-9
3. Zamora 10-9
4. Zamora 10-9
5.Sandoval 10-9
6. Zamora 10-9
7.Sandoval 10-9

On last seconds 8th round Zamora knocked out Sandoval .Great fight.
Woldemar, what did you think of that 7th round? IMO, with Sandoval using primarily the jab, it looked like he solved Zamora and Zamora really looked rocky to me. Superfly didn't seem to continue the strategy into the 8th
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Duran1970 »

Deontay Wilder vs Tyson Fury I

1. 10-9 w
2. 10-9 w
3. 10-9 f
4. 10-9 w
5. 10-9 w
6. 10-9 f
7. 10-9 f
8. 10-9 f
9. 10-8 w
10. 10-9 f
11. 10-9 f
12. 10-8 w
____________

114-112 Wilder
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Head playing tricks with me.

Years ago I watched the Mike Weaver v Scott Ledoux 12 rounder and scored it widely for Weaver. In ensuing years, I somehow thought the judges scored it only closely for Weaver, which prompted me to once again tune in on this one without verifying the scores first. I rescored it today and realized I must have been thinking of another fight. Actual scores were - all for Weaver - 117-114 (that first score made me say, "Aha"!), and then 118-110 and 117-108. The last two being totally in line with my card. Which, btw, was 119-110 for Weaver. I had the first round even, the second for Ledoux and rounds 3-12 all for Weaver. I would have had it 119-109 but the solid knockdown Weaver scored in the 6th was ruled a slip by the myopic ref.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

After seeing Duran1970's score for Fury-Wilder I realised the fight now had to be online. Previously I'd only seen highlights so here's my card

Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder

R1.10-9 TF
R2.10-10 Even
R3.10-10 Even
R4.10-9 TF
R5.10-10 Even
R6.10-9 TF
R7.10-9 TF
R8.10-9 TF
R9.10-8 DW
R10.10-9 TF
R11.10-9 TF
R12.10-8 DW

Tyson Fury 116-113
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Duran1970 »

I've watched it numerous times before it was online..all five times I have a draw or wilder... watching live I had it even...but certainly wouldn't argue a close win fury...I would argue 10-2 fury though.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Evander Holyfield vs George Foreman

R1.10-9 EH
R2.10-9 GF
R3.10-9 EH
R4.10-9 EH
R5.10-9 EH
R6.10-9 EH
R7.10-10 Even
R8.10-9 EH
R9.10-8 GF (no knockdown but Foreman was in trouble)
R10.10-9 GF
R11.10-8 EH (1 pt taken from Foreman for a low blow)
R12.10-9 EH

Evander Holyfield 118-109

I had it alot wider than judges, and even though Foreman had his moments in almost every round, Holyfield was always doing more, scoring well with the jab, combos, leads, etc. I think George should have used that jab to the chest he's known for, all night.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15097
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I think I had it about 116-110 for Holyfield. Holyfield hit Foreman almost at will, which was not surprising. What was surprising was that Foreman was able to stay on his feet the whole time. Maybe what was even more surprising was that Foreman was able to land as often as he did. Much more exciting fight than expected.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Here is a terrific little 10 rounder I think everyone would enjoy. John 'The Beast' Mugabi v James 'Hard Rock' Green. 10 point must system in effect.

Round 1: 10-9 Green
Round 2: 10-10 Even
Round 3: 10-8 Green (no knockdown but Green battered the life out of Mugabi)
Round 4: 10-9 Mugabi
Round 5: 10-9 Mugabi
Round 6: 10-10 Even
Round 7: 10-9 Mugabi
Round 8: 10-9 Mugabi
Round 9: 10-9 Green
Round 10: Mugabi stops Green

Total (through 9 completed rounds): 86-86 Even

Again, just a terrific fight. In our day and age I can see a referee stopping the bout in Green's favor in the 3rd. Also of interest was the stoppage in the 10th, with Lou Duva and James Green protesting the stoppage vehemently. Again, today it would have been stopped a bit sooner. Actual scores were 86-85, 88-86 and 88-84 for Mugabi. I highly recommend this fight.
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9037
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by John »

We are testing a new feature where you can enter past and active scorecards. If you are have already posted on this thread you should see the scorecard icon to the right of the bout.

Please let us know how you find this feature, any problems etc. Also it would be good to have ideas how we can display the scores entered.

I have created a new thread here so this thread doesn't get polluted by it ..
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=237469

thanks John :TU:
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Several weeks back I scored the first fight between Jeff Chandler and Oscar Muniz and now I wanted to re-watch the rematch. Man, you're rarely going to see another fight like this. Fast, hard and clean punches by both combatants at an incredible rate with both fighters showing a ton of heart. Here we go with the title on the line.

Round 1: 10-9 Chandler
Round 2: 10-9 Chandler (Chandler got rocked towards the end of the round but I felt he still did enough)
Round 3: 10-9 Muniz
Round 4: 10-9 Muniz
Round 5: 10-9 Muniz
Round 6: 10-9 Chandler
Round 7: Fight is stopped due to cuts in Chandler's favor

Total (through 6 completed rounds): 57-57 Even

Actual scores were 58-56 (twice) and 59-56 all for Chandler. So many close rounds I can see everyone with a different score. This fight really annoyed me. Not from it taking place, but because of what Muniz went through from the WBA and WBC for that matter. The only reason he got this title fight was because he beat Chandler in a hastily-made non-title fight, which he won. He had a record of 35-3 against stiff competition and neither organization would even rate him in their top ten. They were too concerned with rating inept fighters from cash-cow countries. Wait until you see Muniz fighting and you'll say to yourself, "How was this guy unrated?"
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Julio Cesar Chavez vs Edwin Rosario

I gave Rosario the 9th after he appeared to be hurt in the previous round, but that was it, 99-91 for Chavez when Rosario's corner through in the towel. Rosario started the 4th, 5th and 7th well, but Chavez's constant pressure swung the rounds.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

I happen to see a mention on some thread somewhere that there was some controversy over Oba Carr's decision over Derrell Coley. Well that's all I needed to see, so I looked up the fight on youtube. And guys, you gotta see it. What a terrific fight. Here we go.

Round 1: 10-9 Coley
Round 2: 10-9 Coley
Round 3: 10-9 Carr
Round 4: 10-10 Even
Round 5: 10-9 Carr
Round 6: 10-9 Coley
Round 7: 10-10 Even
Round 8: 10-9 Coley (Coley was hurt at the end of the round but I still felt he did enough that round to take it)
Round 9: 10-9 Carr
Round 10: 10-9 Carr
Round 11: 10-9 Carr
Round 12: 10-9 Coley

Total: 115-115 Draw

Actual scores were 116-114 Coley, 115-113 Carr and 115-114 Carr. To tell you the truth, all the scores including mine were right there. Nothing too wild or out of the question. I would call this a close decision but not a bad decision. The judges were in line. And I really enjoyed this fight which was fought at an incredible pace.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Couple of Japanese Flyweights from the 60's.

Kiyoshi Tanabe vs Horacio Accavallo

Tanabe won every round including the 3rd and 4th when he scored knockdowns.The first from a flurry on the ropes, the second from a right to the jaw. The fight was stopped due to cuts on Accavallo, who came in with a record of 73-1-6. It was the final bout for Tanabe who retired with a serious eye injury. His record was 21-0-1. This was the first time I've ever watched him and I thought he was very good. He bounced around well while jabbing and hooking, and throwing combinations. Unfortunately it's the only video I've found so far.

Hiroyuki Ebihara vs Efren Torres

R1. 5-3 HE (Torres down from a left to the jaw just before the bell)
R2.5-4 HE
R3.5-4 ET
R4.5-4 HE
R5.5-4 ET
R6.5-5 EVEN

Hiroyuki Ebihara TKO 7 Efren Torres (28-26 Ebihara at the time)

Torres was down from a flurry and then stopped on the ropes defenseless. He had some success when he was able to swarm Ebihara in the 3rd and 5th, but always looked vulnerable on the outside.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

Myung Woo Yuh vs Jose DeJesus II

R1.10-9 JD
R2.10-9 MWY
R3.10-9 JD
R4.10-9 JD
R5.10-9 JD
R6.10-9 MWY
R7.10-10 Even
R8.10-9 JD
R9.10-9 JD
R10.10-9 MWY
R11.10-9 MWY
R12.10-10 Even

Jose DeJesus 116-114

This bout was a SD victory for Yuh who won by 3 and 1 pt while one judge had it for DeJesus by 2.

After the first bout between the two, in which Yuh was able to pretty much impose his will on DeJesus, the latter used his jab to perfection to keep the Korean from getting into any kind of rhythm. DeJesus is just textbook perfect the way he uses long jabs, double jabs, and jabs to set up his right hand. Woo is competitive, but the jab consistently keeps him off and his workrate is down noticeably. And the end, the combatants faces also tell the story of how the fight played out.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

I recently watched the 1950 non-title 10 rounder between champ Sandy Saddler and 'Chillin' Charley Riley. A really good 10 rounder. I have no idea how this St. Louis, Mo. scoring system works, however, so I will score in rounds.

Round 1: Riley
Round 2: Riley
Round 3: Saddler
Round 4: Even
Round 5: Saddler
Round 6: Riley
Round 7: Saddler
Round 8: Saddler
Round 9: Saddler
Round 10: Saddler

Total: 6-3-1 Saddler

Official scores were 53-47 and 56-44, both for Saddler and 50-50 for a majority decision win for Saddler. Riley started so fast keeping Saddler's back to the ropes and pounding away. But that took a lot of energy and once Saddler moved the fight to the middle of the ring he took over. Even his infighting improved once he was utilizing those uppercuts that Riley couldn't match. Charley kept it competitive the whole way, however, and it was an enjoyable fight. I wish I could figure out Missouri scoring though. It may have been the 11 point system, which in that case I would have a score of 56 1/2 - 53 1/2 for Saddler, but the first 2 scorecards seem to be a bit lop-sided for that. So I don't know.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16978
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Seamus »

From May 3 2017

Sandy Saddler vs Charley Riley

R1.5-4 CR
R2.5-4 CR
R3.5-4 SS
R4.5-5
R5.5-4 CR
R6.5-5
R7.5-4 SS
R8.5-4 SS
R9.5-5
R10.5-5

47-47 Draw

Official scores in this fight were 53-47 and 56-44 for Saddler and one judge had it 50-50 indicating he scored all 10 rounds EVEN ! and some people think I'm bad :OhYes:
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Seamus wrote: 07 Mar 2020, 19:49 From May 3 2017

Sandy Saddler vs Charley Riley

R1.5-4 CR
R2.5-4 CR
R3.5-4 SS
R4.5-5
R5.5-4 CR
R6.5-5
R7.5-4 SS
R8.5-4 SS
R9.5-5
R10.5-5

47-47 Draw

Official scores in this fight were 53-47 and 56-44 for Saddler and one judge had it 50-50 indicating he scored all 10 rounds EVEN ! and some people think I'm bad :OhYes:
I think this is a great score. it was a tough fight and a tough one to score. I don't believe it was a proper 5 point must scoring system, though. If it was the highest score one could attain would be a 50. So, this Missouri scoring still has me unsure and I always like to score with the point system being used. Oh, well.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

I always liked Frankie Warren. I recall watching his fights with Ronnie Shields and Buddy McGirt back in the day and recently re-watched and scored the first McGirt fight again. I was amazed at the way he dominated these fights and was equally amazed at how McGirt took their rematch. But today I sat down to watch Frankie against Mickey Ward. I gave Ward the 1st round, had rounds 4 and 12 Even and the other 9 rounds for Frankie for a score of 119-111. I was less generous to Mickey than the judges who had Frankie winning 117-111, 115-113 and 116-112. Frankie had one way of fighting. Throw punches until his opponent fell or the final bell rang. Still a good fight as Ward would uncork punches in flurries, usually the last 10 seconds of the round. But Frankie's style was made to burn out early. And this wasn't the same Frankie who beat McGirt 3 years earlier. But I still get a kick out of watching him.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Sat down and watched this recently. Daniel Zaragoza v Seung Hun Lee. Here is how I had it:

Round 1: 10-9 Lee
Round 2: 10-10 Even
Round 3: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 4: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 5: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 6: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 7: 10-10 Even
Round 8: 10-9 Lee
Round 9: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 10: 10-9 Lee
Round 11: 10-9 Zaragoza
Round 12: 10-10 Even

Total: 117-114 Zaragoza

Actual scores were 115-113 Zaragoza, 114-112 Lee and 114-114 Even for a draw. I think the Korean audience played a big part in swaying these officials. It was a tough fight no doubt and their styles made for a bit of a sloppy fight at times. Zaragoza was not a big puncher - more sharp than anything and Lee fought in sloppy flurries so a lot also depends on what one finds impressive. Like I said, it tends to get sloppy at times as well as wayward blows and reckless head-work as well. I will say this, they fought their hearts out.
scartissue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1893
Joined: 31 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by scartissue »

Here was a pretty cool one I got to recently. Julio Cesar Gonzalez vs Glen Johnson. Here is how I had it:

Round 1: 10-9 Johnson
Round 2: 10-9 Johnson
Round 3: 10-9 Gonzalez
Round 4: 10-10 Even
Round 5: 10-9 Johnson
Round 6: 10-9 Gonzalez
Round 7: 10-9 Gonzalez
Round 8: 10-9 Gonzalez
Round 9: 10-10 Even
Round 10: 10-9 Johnson

Total: 96-96 Draw

Actual scores were 98-92 and 96-94 for Gonzalez and the third official had it 95-95 Even. When Johnson could keep Gonzalez inside he dominated, but when Gonzalez could stay on the outside he was keeping Johnson on the end of his punches, but neither fighter was looking to keep a fight plan in their head. They wanted a donnybrook and that's what it was. Changing fortunes constantly and some real flip-of-the-coin rounds.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Counter-puncher »

I’ll check that out. :TU:

The two fights between Clinton Woods and Gonzalez are a fun watch, too.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Counter-puncher »

Wow you’re not kidding

Johnson looks a lot like James Toney early on,in physical appearance and style, rolling shots through his shoulders and hips, shifting his feet to switch and create angles and throw bombs off those angles. Great stuff (30 seconds in anyway)
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Post Your Scorecards

Post by Counter-puncher »

Lol to be fair he returns to being plain old Glen Johnson after that early series of bombs. Still, no disgrace being Glen Johnson :box:
Post Reply