Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Ricky
Super Featherweight
Posts: 13700
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Ricky »

Is it simply fashionable to shït on his skillset outwith his punching power? Here's a clue, there's no power without form. He could easily beat Fury on points on Saturday if he doesn't completely flatten him.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by squiggy »

Of course there's power without form.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Stuarty »

Just because he's so unorthodox and clumsy looking at times. His style doesn't mirror the 'fundamentals' of what you're taught when you start out but he didn't take up the sport till he was 20 and has definitely improved in the last few years especially with the jab. I don't think he can outbox Fury though. Probably beats him by KO but i hope i'm wrong.
kbackup408
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1662
Joined: 08 Sep 2016, 12:58

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by kbackup408 »

You can start with how he sets his punches up but that is what makes him dangerous!
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by oogiebe »

He'll always have his detracters. I think he's improved and I've been ridiculed for that view. He's learned to look for his shots and not force them. He learned to jab and pivot to better setup his shots. He throws his big right down the middle and no longer windmills. I'm sure an obnoxious poster or two will have their say on this.
Perseus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3187
Joined: 26 Jul 2007, 03:58

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Perseus »

Ricky wrote: 19 Feb 2020, 20:48 Is it simply fashionable to shït on his skillset outwith his punching power? Here's a clue, there's no power without form. He could easily beat Fury on points on Saturday if he doesn't completely flatten him.
No power without form?

Yeah nobody can throw a baseball a 100mph without control either.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5738
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Cyclops »

He's genuinely a terrible 'boxer'. Haven''t you watched him? He got outboxed by Szpilka before he KO'd him, and Szpilka was always crap. Ortiz and Fury are both fantastic boxers: Wilder only hangs with them because of his power and his chin.

C'mon, man. Let's look at somebody like... Say Carl Froch? Quite slow, terrible defence, poor footwork, not even special power. He wasn't the best boxer was he? What he had was an iron chin and an unrelenting desire to dig in. These are the 'intangibles' that made Froch what he was.

It's obvious that Wilder's intangible' is his power and whether or not he can land it. But he's a poor boxer, and Fury is a very good boxer. Wilder just loses round after round. Even against Washington, he dropped rounds.

He's not a good boxer at all.

He's the definition of a puncher.
Ricky
Super Featherweight
Posts: 13700
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Ricky »

clopixolacuphase wrote: 19 Feb 2020, 22:14 He's genuinely a terrible 'boxer'. Haven''t you watched him? He got outboxed by Szpilka before he KO'd him, and Szpilka was always crap. Ortiz and Fury are both fantastic boxers: Wilder only hangs with them because of his power and his chin.

C'mon, man. Let's look at somebody like... Say Carl Froch? Quite slow, terrible defence, poor footwork, not even special power. He wasn't the best boxer was he? What he had was an iron chin and an unrelenting desire to dig in. These are the 'intangibles' that made Froch what he was.

It's obvious that Wilder's intangible' is his power and whether or not he can land it. But he's a poor boxer, and Fury is a very good boxer. Wilder just loses round after round. Even against Washington, he dropped rounds.

He's not a good boxer at all.

He's the definition of a puncher.

Fury isn't a good boxer, infact, if anyone benefits from physical gifts it's Fury, not Wilder. When you are 6ft 9, leaning back, and pawing out a jab on the end of a 7 foot reach it makes you quite a bit harder to hit. It's laughable people think this guy istechnically gifted, he looks like a drunk, fat uncle at a party who's had too many pints and tries to do impressions of Mayweather out the back garden.

You talk about Wilder being outboxed by Ortiz, granted he did, but Ortiz (other than Usyk) is probably the most schooled heavyweight in the last decade. Tyson Fury got outboxed by John McDermott.
Oben321
Welterweight
Posts: 58
Joined: 01 Apr 2016, 22:27

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Oben321 »

Wilder started boxing in 2005.
Wins both the National Golden Gloves & US Championships in 2007 at 201lbs(91 kg)
He goes on to lose in the semi-finals of the Olympics gaining a Bronze Medal 🥉
Yeah....sounds like a shitty boxer to me! :doh:
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by squiggy »

cf. young George Foreman. Hard hitters do sometimes succeed without great fundamental skills.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5738
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Cyclops »

Ricky wrote: 19 Feb 2020, 22:38
clopixolacuphase wrote: 19 Feb 2020, 22:14 He's genuinely a terrible 'boxer'. Haven''t you watched him? He got outboxed by Szpilka before he KO'd him, and Szpilka was always crap. Ortiz and Fury are both fantastic boxers: Wilder only hangs with them because of his power and his chin.

C'mon, man. Let's look at somebody like... Say Carl Froch? Quite slow, terrible defence, poor footwork, not even special power. He wasn't the best boxer was he? What he had was an iron chin and an unrelenting desire to dig in. These are the 'intangibles' that made Froch what he was.

It's obvious that Wilder's intangible' is his power and whether or not he can land it. But he's a poor boxer, and Fury is a very good boxer. Wilder just loses round after round. Even against Washington, he dropped rounds.

He's not a good boxer at all.

He's the definition of a puncher.

Fury isn't a good boxer, infact, if anyone benefits from physical gifts it's Fury, not Wilder. When you are 6ft 9, leaning back, and pawing out a jab on the end of a 7 foot reach it makes you quite a bit harder to hit. It's laughable people think this guy istechnically gifted, he looks like a drunk, fat uncle at a party who's had too many pints and tries to do impressions of Mayweather out the back garden.

You talk about Wilder being outboxed by Ortiz, granted he did, but Ortiz (other than Usyk) is probably the most schooled heavyweight in the last decade. Tyson Fury got outboxed by John McDermott.
I agree. Should have been his first loss. Stopped him the rematch though, didn't he?

The other argument would be sound if Ortiz wasn't so old and had already been KO'd by Wilder, and had looked terrible going the distance against a fighter that Chisora had stopped way back when the kid was actually trying then, and subsequently stopped in a round by Wilder. (Sparring partner and sacrificial lamb Malik Scott)

Before Wlad I would have agreed with you. But during that fight Fury showed us he can box and win rounds off A+ Heavies.

Fury was the burned out coke head fat and mentally unstable cherry pick that went wrong. I don't mind admitting when I'm wrong, but I think Wilder's in trouble come Sunday morning.
Finkel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1381
Joined: 08 Sep 2018, 20:51

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Finkel »

Weird thread
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2768
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

- The Bronze Bambi BOXING is underrated because he stinks so bad that folks are too busy gagging to see thru the stink how bad he is, hence he must be underrated!

Very much like the OP stinks, hence Bayliss tapped to be hitching rides on Fury's back all night if this clown show goes that far. That swings the near even odds in the lead up to favor Haymon's boy under the table with Moretti the Ace in the hole covering any decision.

Simples :TU:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by margaret thatcher »

He has a top level inside game too, tbh, his offensive fire means he can overwhelm pretty much everyone in any situation, he will ktfo Fury this time too
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by cormack »

Tomato cans
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39238
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by margaret thatcher »

oogiebe wrote: 19 Feb 2020, 21:31 He'll always have his detracters. I think he's improved and I've been ridiculed for that view. He's learned to look for his shots and not force them. He learned to jab and pivot to better setup his shots. He throws his big right down the middle and no longer windmills. I'm sure an obnoxious poster or two will have their say on this.
He has done all that stuff for a while. For example, we can see him throwing straight right hands regularly for years and years now, like when he KTFO Liakhovich. I'm really quite surprised anyone following his career would think that's something new when it's been his main shot since the amateurs. The windmill is a thing he does specifically when he hurts opponents and he was still getting wild as of two fights ago. He has also generally been a patient fighter--until he hurts the opponent. Watch him vs Washington for example, he hardly threw anything until the right in the 5th. The jab? Not sure I'm seeing much of that still yet, at least beyond the pawing probing shot its almost always been. His best jab showing by far is still Stiv 1.

I learned today that he might be a murderer on the inside too, now there is one thing I haven't seen yet, that would be a genuine new development.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Wilders' boxing ability isn't underrated. He’s simply a one trick pony, but it’s one helluva trick to have!

He just has a natural ability for knocking people out and he's become overly reliant on it, hence the reason why he has failed to fully develop fundamentally-sound pugilistic skills.

We’ve seen him out boxed during lengthy spells by the likes of Szpilka, Washington, Ortiz (twice) and Fury.

He’s also extremely crude and clumsy when he goes in for the kill. He loses composure when he’s either put under pressure or becomes overly-excited about an opportunity to stop the fight, which compels him to start blindly flailing looping hooks.

Wilder’s defence is also extremely porous, hence the reason why we’ve seen him wobbled on many occasions.

His main strategy for avoiding taking shots from his opponents is to use his legs and lateral movement to stay out of punching range, but he doesn’t know how to effectively use his guard when he’s on the inside or tie up his opponents.

There’s no denying that Wilder is extremely effective at what he does, but his boxing skills definitely aren’t underrated.

And to be perfectly honest, that’s fine by me, because his fights are usually exciting and his unorthodox clumsy style, speed, size and athleticism has allowed him to achieve a great amount of success in the sport.

The problem with Wilder though, is that he’ll likely become a shot fighter overnight, much akin to Roy Jones’ Jr., because he won’t possess the boxing acumen, skills and experience to adapt his style to cater for his ageing body. He'll start losing badly the very moment he slows down.

So I think he’s only got a couple of years left in him.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by danconnollyeire »

Erm maybe because he loses every minute of every round every time he fights someone with half a pulse
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by littlepug »

He’s getting better, to land a big ko shot you need good timing, your feet set right and a good delivery of the shot so he’s got that, If he could improve his general movement and develop his jab more he be even more frightening than he is now !
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by keirw »

Neither Wilder or Fury are technically sound boxers, really.

Fury has a great ring sense and good defensive reflexes. Although, he tends to throw arm punches more often than not.

Wilder has power and natural speed, however, he often struggles to find his range and timing, thus tending to drop rounds whilst waiting for opportunities to land.

Both men have developed styles that make the most of their natural attributes and are both difficult to beat for differing reasons.
Last edited by keirw on 20 Feb 2020, 06:30, edited 1 time in total.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Enlightened-One wrote: 20 Feb 2020, 05:40 Wilders' boxing ability isn't underrated. He’s simply a one trick pony, but it’s one helluva trick to have!

He just has a natural ability for knocking people out and he's become overly reliant on it, hence the reason why he has failed to fully develop fundamentally-sound pugilistic skills.

We’ve seen him out boxed during lengthy spells by the likes of Szpilka, Washington, Ortiz (twice) and Fury.

He’s also extremely crude and clumsy when he goes in for the kill. He loses composure when he’s either put under pressure or becomes overly-excited about an opportunity to stop the fight, which compels him to start blindly flailing looping hooks.

Wilder’s defence is also extremely porous, hence the reason why we’ve seen him wobbled on many occasions.

His main strategy for avoiding taking shots from his opponents is to use his legs and lateral movement to stay out of punching range, but he doesn’t know how to effectively use his guard when he’s on the inside or tie up his opponents.

There’s no denying that Wilder is extremely effective at what he does, but his boxing skills definitely aren’t underrated.

And to be perfectly honest, that’s fine by me, because his fights are usually exciting and his unorthodox clumsy style, speed, size and athleticism has allowed him to achieve a great amount of success in the sport.

The problem with Wilder though, is that he’ll likely become a shot fighter overnight, much akin to Roy Jones’ Jr., because he won’t possess the boxing acumen, skills and experience to adapt his style to cater for his ageing body. He'll start losing badly the very moment he slows down.

So I think he’s only got a couple of years left in him.
Holy shit. I actually agreed with everything you wrote
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Enlightened-One »

keirw wrote: 20 Feb 2020, 06:29Fury has a great ring sense and good defensive reflexes. Although, he tends to throw arm punches more often than not.
Tyson doesn’t try to knock-out his opponents.

He uses the jab as “scoring punch” only. All he's trying to do is simply hit the target. It distracts his foes and if these shots are allowed to continuously land, then the cumulative effect will likely result in facial damage.

He doesn’t step into his shots when he throws the jab, because it closes the distance. He's exploiting his reach advantage, whilst staying out of harms’ way.

One of the other reasons for Tyson having such fantastic stamina for a big man, is because when he chooses to throw a heavy punch, he uses his bodyweight as leverage (to create the force). He doesn’t try to load up, because he has 20 stones of body mass behind his blows... and this allows him to remain relaxed, due to the fact he doesn't need to muscle his way through each punch.

If you watch some of Tyson’s early career bouts, you’ll notice a distinct stylistic difference, because back then he was always looking to score the KO, but he doesn’t do this now.

I think there’s nothing more vulnerable than a fighter that thinks they’re a big puncher, when they aren’t. So Tyson has sensibly tailored his style accordingly.
Bandog
Featherweight
Posts: 2471
Joined: 27 Jul 2019, 08:02

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by Bandog »

keirw wrote: 20 Feb 2020, 06:29 Neither Wilder or Fury are technically sound boxers, really.

Fury has a great ring sense and good defensive reflexes. Although, he tends to throw arm punches more often than not.

Wilder has power and natural speed, however, he often struggles to find his range and timing, thus tending to drop rounds whilst waiting for opportunities to land.

Both men have developed styles that make the most of their natural attributes and are both difficult to beat for differing reasons.

Well said. Its funny I don't remember people going on and on about George Foreman back in the early-mid 70's about his lack of boxing ability. He sure showed his raw power though, and demolished several very good boxers.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by danconnollyeire »

Imagine mentioning Fury's fight with McDermott 11 years a go when Fury was 20 and 6-0. Big John was a good fighter
paddy chavez
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2678
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08

Re: Why is Wilder's Boxing Ability so Underrated?

Post by paddy chavez »

Riddick Blowe wrote: 20 Feb 2020, 06:30
Enlightened-One wrote: 20 Feb 2020, 05:40 Wilders' boxing ability isn't underrated. He’s simply a one trick pony, but it’s one helluva trick to have!

He just has a natural ability for knocking people out and he's become overly reliant on it, hence the reason why he has failed to fully develop fundamentally-sound pugilistic skills.

We’ve seen him out boxed during lengthy spells by the likes of Szpilka, Washington, Ortiz (twice) and Fury.

He’s also extremely crude and clumsy when he goes in for the kill. He loses composure when he’s either put under pressure or becomes overly-excited about an opportunity to stop the fight, which compels him to start blindly flailing looping hooks.

Wilder’s defence is also extremely porous, hence the reason why we’ve seen him wobbled on many occasions.

His main strategy for avoiding taking shots from his opponents is to use his legs and lateral movement to stay out of punching range, but he doesn’t know how to effectively use his guard when he’s on the inside or tie up his opponents.

There’s no denying that Wilder is extremely effective at what he does, but his boxing skills definitely aren’t underrated.

And to be perfectly honest, that’s fine by me, because his fights are usually exciting and his unorthodox clumsy style, speed, size and athleticism has allowed him to achieve a great amount of success in the sport.

The problem with Wilder though, is that he’ll likely become a shot fighter overnight, much akin to Roy Jones’ Jr., because he won’t possess the boxing acumen, skills and experience to adapt his style to cater for his ageing body. He'll start losing badly the very moment he slows down.

So I think he’s only got a couple of years left in him.
Holy poo. I actually agreed with everything you wrote
Same here :D
Post Reply