Kenny Bayliss

unknownman79
Super Featherweight
Posts: 251
Joined: 20 Jul 2019, 08:41

Kenny Bayliss

Post by unknownman79 »

Incompetent or just plain biased in favour of Wilder?

I go with the latter. The point deduction, the having words giving wilder time etc.
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13914
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Ricky »

Fury deserved a point off, his leaning all over Wilder was ridiculous. Bayless has been well past kt for some time though, and a 70 year old man shouldn't be tasked with pulling apart 2 heavyweight giants.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by ewenhay »

Corrupt.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4940
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by rd350lc »

Ricky wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 06:01 Fury deserved a point off, his leaning all over Wilder was ridiculous. Bayless has been well past kt for some time though, and a 70 year old man shouldn't be tasked with pulling apart 2 heavyweight giants.
No mention of Wilder tying Fury up like an octopus every time they came inside ?
Got to work both ways unless you are favouring one fighter that is .
Wilder was as big a culprit .
greg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5348
Joined: 23 Mar 2007, 07:44

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by greg »

supporting a local boxer is nothing new..
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Cyclops »

I told my brother in law last night: he'll lose a point. It doesn't matter it's the right tactic. Keep leaning on him.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by danconnollyeire »

Ricky wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 06:01 Fury deserved a point off, his leaning all over Wilder was ridiculous. Bayless has been well past kt for some time though, and a 70 year old man shouldn't be tasked with pulling apart 2 heavyweight giants.
😂 you’re so pathetic
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Stuarty »

Corrupt and not fit for purpose. Should be retired and melted down for glue.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by ewenhay »

Stuarty wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 09:26 Corrupt and not fit for purpose. Should be retired and melted down for glue.
Close thread.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32945
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Boxerbeetle »

The point deduction was ridiculous, but other than that I didn’t think Bayliss was too bad tbh. Certainly better than many British refs we’ve seen in world title fights.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Covfefe »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 09:33 The point deduction was ridiculous, but other than that I didn’t think Bayliss was too bad tbh. Certainly better than many British refs we’ve seen in world title fights.
I didn’t think the point off was bad, he hit him after he said stop punching.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16905
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I’ve no idea why he docked the point, it was never gonna matter what I will say is he was too old to be reffing that fight, could hardly pull them apart
paddy chavez
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2678
Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 08:08

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by paddy chavez »

ewenhay wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 07:23Corrupt.
Definitely from the first bell he broke them up to help wilder .
I read an article about ref's and judges saying they don't take blatant money bribes but the promotor will put them up in a suite at a nice hotel with a unlimited tab and limos and if the ref goes against the promotors fighter he doesn't get those perks next time he's put in a holiday Inn miles from anywhere.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Covfefe »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 09:56 I’ve no idea why he docked the point, it was never gonna matter what I will say is he was too old to be reffing that fight, could hardly pull them apart
I don’t think his age had anything to do with why he couldn’t separate them.

And he docked the point because he said stop punching and Tyson then punched Deontay in the face.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23200
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by handsofstone »

Another clown but boxings full of them luckily Fury gave his lad a lesson
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by DrDuke »

I rewatched this moment for a few times and I just don't understand, what was wrong there. Apart from that Bayless was doing good in this fight and he's a solid ref overall.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6883
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by chinarich »

Stuarty wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 09:26 Corrupt and not fit for purpose. Should be retired and melted down for glue.
:lol:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28509
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Coco »

Awful performance.

If they had Baylis in the first fight it would have been enough for Wilder to win.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by TheGman »

unknownman79 wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 05:56 Incompetent or just plain biased in favour of Wilder?

I go with the latter. The point deduction, the having words giving wilder time etc.
Is this his name? I thought it was chris rock
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by TheGman »

Stuarty wrote: 23 Feb 2020, 09:26 Corrupt and not fit for purpose. Should be retired and melted down for glue.
Nah dont think he'd stick haha
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by THEBUTCH »

IMO Kenny Bayliss is currently the best ref out there.

Some nights are better than others.
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by dalcumly »

I'm not sure if he's a good referee or not but I DO know he spent the last round and a half staring into Wilders eyes, presumably because he could see him staggering around the ring and was ready to step in if necessary.
It's always been the case that for a point to be deducted there has to be a serious or persistent infringement. I didn't see anything resembling either of these situations. In such a prominent world title fight a point deduction at that point was extraordinary.
My own opinion was that he seen his own countryman getting hammered and wanted to give him time to recover and give him encouragement.
danconnollyeire
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by danconnollyeire »

Apparently the point deduction was for Fury throwing a punch after the break (a punch he missed). Wilder did the same about 20 times but don't worry about that kids, it's US boxing
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13417
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by jameswilson »

I’d always considered Bayless the top referee in the World until Saturday night. It definitely seemed he was pro wilder to a point he wasn’t trying to hide it.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11181
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Kenny Bayliss

Post by Ezzard »

He's been a stooge for years
Post Reply