Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26497
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by KiwiRider »

margaret thatcher wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 20:04 You're very welcome mate, I'm glad I could be of such help :lol:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26497
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by KiwiRider »

margaret thatcher wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 20:04 You're very welcome mate, I'm glad I could be of such help :lol:
Ah, yeah. About as much help as clapping for the NHS :wave:
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by lazboy »

boxing_rocks wrote: 28 Mar 2020, 14:46 Just rewatched it. That was the best fight Lara ever fought. He at least deserved a draw. Personally, I had him winning 8 rounds. Canelo was mainly hitting air, arms, elbows. He also landed quite a few punches on Lara's back. I don't see how he could be given more than 6 rounds.
Did you keep a round by round?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by margaret thatcher »

I would imagine his rbr scoring for Lara-Canelo is something like

1: GGG
2: GGG
3: GGG (10-8)
4. GGG
5. Beterbiev
6. GGG
7.GGG
8. Loma
9. Loma
10.GGG (10-7)
11. GGG
12. Povetkin/Kovalev

All those guys get wins vs Canelo added to their record, Canelo takes 5 losses at once
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by lazboy »

Lol, he posts a lot of embarrassing shite.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by Onetimeonly »

Looks like somebody got into the wine coolers again.
RonnyJ
Featherweight
Posts: 788
Joined: 18 Sep 2019, 15:01

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by RonnyJ »

the thread moved a bit into a canelo fanboy thread, but what about the main point, do u guys now understand that a record can be not clear, not just because you have a name boxer on your win record doesnt mean right away you achieved something phenomenal. the age and the training shape of your opponent plays a huge factor and obviously if your win was a gift, controversial.

also what many seem to forget, sometimes a loss means more than a win. winning for example against a average boxer doesnt mean as much as losing (yet having a close same eye level) fight with an excellent opponent. breidis being close to beating yet losing against against the best cw ever meant more than any of his other fights!

I wounder which boxer in history beat the most prime atg in non controversial manner. leonard, robinson, pacquiao come to my mind. why not ali, good question. aside from his losses, he had a lot of controversial fights. norton fights were all controversial, liston II fight was controversial because people felt liston got paid out to stay on the canvas.

leonard also had controversial fights, although i dont find the hagler fight controversial, i thought he beat him. well the hearns fight is another story, leonard himself said 1 win 1 loss against hearns, at least he honest.
boxing_rocks
Welterweight
Posts: 7851
Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by boxing_rocks »

lazboy wrote: 28 Mar 2020, 22:35
boxing_rocks wrote: 28 Mar 2020, 14:46 Just rewatched it. That was the best fight Lara ever fought. He at least deserved a draw. Personally, I had him winning 8 rounds. Canelo was mainly hitting air, arms, elbows. He also landed quite a few punches on Lara's back. I don't see how he could be given more than 6 rounds.
Did you keep a round by round?
Yes, but I didn't right them down. 6 of the rounds were close and could have gone either way. The other 6, I had Lara winning 5:1.
thomasjkelley
Cruiserweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 12 Mar 2011, 03:58

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by thomasjkelley »

You just can't compare eras. Talking "greatest of all time: is always just going to be talk, it's just an opinion. But I agree about Canelo. Most people believe he lost both those fights to Golovkin. He would have been better off getting a decision loss in the first one than that ridiculous scoring. People hold it against him, as if he has something to do with the judging, & that is because his promotion in all likelihood does have something to do with it. At the very least, they guarantee he gets friendly judges
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by candyslim »

Not sure Canelo would agree with you but I do.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by Paci »

Canelo's bouts are real nightmares to score sometimes. That is what I take away from this. And yeah, GGG 1 was a robbery, the second one I do think Canelo got it thou.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by candyslim »

Second fight was closer but I still thought it was clearly Golovkin's fight. I reckon Canelo wins on merit though if there's a next time.
EvanderHolyCrap
Super Featherweight
Posts: 15
Joined: 09 Dec 2018, 13:44

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by EvanderHolyCrap »

Enlightened-One wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 06:05
RonnyJ wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 04:42

If u think canelo won against lara and didnt have questionable fights with GGG than u delusional.
I understand the controversies for the GGG bouts, but not for his contest over Lara.

For sure, his fight against the Cuban was close, but the Mexican deserved the victory. It was a close fight though, but certainly no robbery.

Lara was employing effective defence during the first five rounds, such as making Canelo miss and then making him pay. However, from round six onwards, he was being too defensive and simply didn’t let his hands go often enough. Erislandy was responsible for his own downfall, because he had the capability to win, but he forfeited too many rounds due to his own negative approach.
Nah he outboxed Canelo but Canelo fans were annoyed he could barely touch Lara for most of the fight while getting picked off by quick straight shots.
EvanderHolyCrap
Super Featherweight
Posts: 15
Joined: 09 Dec 2018, 13:44

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by EvanderHolyCrap »

Paci wrote: 31 Mar 2020, 12:02 Canelo's bouts are real nightmares to score sometimes. That is what I take away from this. And yeah, GGG 1 was a robbery, the second one I do think Canelo got it thou.
Canelo tries to win rounds by waiting in his opponent to advance into his range too much and counter with flashy combinations. Thing is he usually gets outboxed outside of these small bursts of action but they usually look fancy and get a woo from the crowd, so, well, the judges do what they do in a Canelo fight.
RonnyJ
Featherweight
Posts: 788
Joined: 18 Sep 2019, 15:01

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by RonnyJ »

EvanderHolyCrap wrote: 05 Apr 2020, 22:35
Paci wrote: 31 Mar 2020, 12:02 Canelo's bouts are real nightmares to score sometimes. That is what I take away from this. And yeah, GGG 1 was a robbery, the second one I do think Canelo got it thou.
Canelo tries to win rounds by waiting in his opponent to advance into his range too much and counter with flashy combinations. Thing is he usually gets outboxed outside of these small bursts of action but they usually look fancy and get a woo from the crowd, so, well, the judges do what they do in a Canelo fight.
he is the superstar and thats the reason he gets all those gifts. yet i like his boxing style, he is a very good boxer, just not a phenomenal boxer.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by Paci »

EvanderHolyCrap wrote: 05 Apr 2020, 22:35
Paci wrote: 31 Mar 2020, 12:02 Canelo's bouts are real nightmares to score sometimes. That is what I take away from this. And yeah, GGG 1 was a robbery, the second one I do think Canelo got it thou.
Canelo tries to win rounds by waiting in his opponent to advance into his range too much and counter with flashy combinations. Thing is he usually gets outboxed outside of these small bursts of action but they usually look fancy and get a woo from the crowd, so, well, the judges do what they do in a Canelo fight.
But, stealing rounds is part of the game and that might be just what he is aiming for most of the time. Going for the last 30 secs like Leonard.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by Enlightened-One »

EvanderHolyCrap wrote: 05 Apr 2020, 22:33
Enlightened-One wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 06:05
I understand the controversies for the GGG bouts, but not for his contest over Lara.

For sure, his fight against the Cuban was close, but the Mexican deserved the victory. It was a close fight though, but certainly no robbery.

Lara was employing effective defence during the first five rounds, such as making Canelo miss and then making him pay. However, from round six onwards, he was being too defensive and simply didn’t let his hands go often enough. Erislandy was responsible for his own downfall, because he had the capability to win, but he forfeited too many rounds due to his own negative approach.
Nah he outboxed Canelo but Canelo fans were annoyed he could barely touch Lara for most of the fight while getting picked off by quick straight shots.
The majority of the media also believed Canelo won that fight.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 06:00
EvanderHolyCrap wrote: 05 Apr 2020, 22:33
Nah he outboxed Canelo but Canelo fans were annoyed he could barely touch Lara for most of the fight while getting picked off by quick straight shots.
The majority of the media also believed Canelo won that fight.
Weren't the numbers you provided 38% for Canelo and 33% for Lara? Hardly convincing.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by margaret thatcher »

So the majority had Canelo winning, yet over 60 percent didn't have him winning! Does that mean the majority had him winning and the majority had him not winning at the same time ?

So many different ways you can play with the phrases to suit your point :lol:

It also makes me think, what if major fights now had it so you could win a 1-0-2 judges decision instead of it being a draw :oo
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 14:52 So the majority had Canelo winning, yet over 60 percent didn't have him winning! Does that mean the majority had him winning and the majority had him not winning at the same time ?

So many different ways you can play with the phrases to suit your point :lol:

It also makes me think, what if major fights now had it so you could win a 1-0-2 judges decision instead of it being a draw :oo
:clap:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by Enlightened-One »

RonnyJ wrote: 27 Mar 2020, 04:42If u think canelo won against lara ... then u delusional.
EvanderHolyCrap wrote: 05 Apr 2020, 22:33Nah he outboxed Canelo but Canelo fans were annoyed he could barely touch Lara for most of the fight while getting picked off by quick straight shots.
• Ryan Burton (BS) : 116-112 Canelo
• All About Boxing : 115-113 Canelo
• Phil D Jay (WorldBoxingNews) : 116-112 Canelo
• The Boxing Expert : 115-113 Canelo
• Danny Flexen (Boxing News) : 117-113 Canelo
• Adam Abramowitz (Saturday Night Boxing) : 115-113 Canelo
• David Greisman (BS) : 115-113 Canelo
• Lance Pugmire (LA Times) : 115-113 Canelo
• Daniel Vano (Checkhookboxing) : 115-114 Canelo
• Steve Bunce (allegedly TV) : 115-113 Canelo
• Matt Knowles (3MoreRounds) : 116-112 Canelo
• Rich Marotta (KFI Radio) : 115-113 Canelo
• Pro Boxing Fans Jake : 115-113 Canelo
• Dan Rafael (ESPN) : 116-112 Canelo
• Martin Gallegas (The Boxing Channel) : 115-113 Canelo
• Ryan Bivins (Sweetboxing) : 115-113 Canelo
• FightersRated : 115-114 Canelo
• Doug Fischer (Ring Magazine) : 115-113 Canelo
• Kevin McRae (Bleacher Report) : 115-113 Canelo
• Fightnews : 115-113 Canelo
• Max Kellerman (HBO) : 115-113 Canelo
• Fight Ghost : 115-113 Canelo
• Boxing Chat : 116-114 Canelo
• Ernest Gabion (Everlast) : 115-113 Canelo
• Stephen St John (Sports Radio 810 WHB) : 115-113 Canelo
• Graham Houston (Boxing Monthly) : 116-112 Canelo
• Tom Gray (Ring Magazine) : 116-113 Canelo
• The Sweet Science : 115-113 Canelo
• Mario Mungia (ThaBoxingVoice) : 115-114 Canelo
• Iconic Boxing : 115-113 Canelo
• John Evans (LiveFight) : 115-113 Canelo
• Bryan Kenny (Showtime TV) : 116-112 Canelo
• Steve Adams Jnr (Punchperfectpugilism) : 116-113 Canelo
• Ciaran Shanks (Irvine Times) :115-113 Canelo
• Norm Frauenheim (Ring Magazine) : 116-114 Canelo
• Jeffrey Freeman (KODigest.TV) : 115-113 Canelo
• Andreas Hale (KnockoutNation.com) : 115-113 Canelo
• Diego Morilla (XN Sports) : 115-113 Canelo
• Kenny Porter (Trainer) : 116-112 Canelo
• Abel Sanchez (Trainer) : 115-113 Canelo
• Anson Wainwright (Ring Magazine) : 115-113 Canelo

Enough said! :TU:
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by lazboy »

:doh:

Not that anyone needs the reminder, but the threads a clear example of how ridiculous a poster EO is. Embarrassing that he/she/it continues in this manner; spewing skewed stats on repeat (his/her/its usual business).
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by oogiebe »

lazboy wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 17:31 :doh:

Not that anyone needs the reminder, but the threads a clear example of how ridiculous a poster EO is. Embarrassing that he/she/it continues in this manner; spewing skewed stats on repeat (his/her/its usual business).
He's the same poster who said 38% of media had Canelo winning. Duh! So 62% were for Lara or draw. Maddening he is.
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by lazboy »

oogiebe wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 17:33
lazboy wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 17:31 :doh:

Not that anyone needs the reminder, but the threads a clear example of how ridiculous a poster EO is. Embarrassing that he/she/it continues in this manner; spewing skewed stats on repeat (his/her/its usual business).
He's the same poster who said 38% of media had Canelo winning. Duh! So 62% were for Lara or draw. Maddening he is.
I’ll keep it brief as there’s more significant worries in the world. Basically he’s a complete waste of time, irrational and very unreliable.

I’m not able to take anything he says seriously, given he continually provides skewed information. Most of his posts are emotive, cloaked in skewed “facts”, like the above posts.
Last edited by lazboy on 06 Apr 2020, 17:53, edited 1 time in total.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Lets see if boxrec changed for the good

Post by oogiebe »

lazboy wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 17:44
oogiebe wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 17:33

He's the same poster who said 38% of media had Canelo winning. Duh! So 62% were for Lara or draw. Maddening he is.
I’ll keep it brief as there’s more significant worries in the world. Basically he’s a complete waste of time, irrational and very unreliable.

I’m not able to take anything he says seriously, given he continually provides skewed information. Most of his posts are emotive, cloaked in skewed “facts”.
You are 100% correct. There are more worries in the world. EO isn't a worry though. You layed it out pretty effectively. :TU:
Post Reply