Thank you for your responseheavyweight Rating
heavyweight Rating
Why is the first Fury in the heavyweight rating and not Joshua as the title holder? Thank you for your response
Thank you for your response-
computerrank
- Editor
- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: heavyweight Rating
End of.-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39227
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: heavyweight Rating
Fury is the clear 1 atm. The most itneresting change in the HWR is the pound for pound elite status of both Fury #2 and Wilder #5 
Re: heavyweight Rating
The titleholder? Fury also holds titles, the WBC one and ''The Ring'' one... So, Joshua has got 4 heavyweight titles, Fury's got 2. That means, there are two titleholders...
Re: heavyweight Rating
still four titles are more than two
so again why is Fury the first in the rating and Joshua the third? 
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39227
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: heavyweight Rating
Someone been hitting the kruck pipe
Re: heavyweight Rating
Ratings are automatically compiled by computer algorithms. Those, of course, are in turn programmed by humans, but it is not like somebody would be sitting behind a keyboard, thinking "who am I going to put at number 1 in the ratings today, for a change"?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39227
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: heavyweight Rating
Lol it's amazing how many people think the ratings are doctered to hurt/benefit certain fighters. You see time to time as well totally random/no name fighters or their managers come on here thinking there is some grand conspiracy to have that no name fighter drop in the BoxRec rankings . I've also seen suggestions that they were designed to benefit british fighters and that they are racist against black guys
