That's 7 years. That's a long time in Boxing.elmersalsa wrote: ↑08 May 2020, 22:32 Another one: Aaron "The Hawk" Pryor
From 1976 to 1983, he was sensational. AFTER 1983? Say no to drugs, Aaron!
Greatest fighters without longevity
-
SwayzeWithNoShirtOn
- Featherweight
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 15 May 2020, 09:19
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
-
SwayzeWithNoShirtOn
- Featherweight
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 15 May 2020, 09:19
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Terrence McGovern.
His peak was probably only 3 years. But he proved the best fighter across 3 divisions in that time, with multiple title defenses.
His peak was probably only 3 years. But he proved the best fighter across 3 divisions in that time, with multiple title defenses.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
No, is not. He only had 3 years of primeSwayzeWithNoShirtOn wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 10:12That's 7 years. That's a long time in Boxing.elmersalsa wrote: ↑08 May 2020, 22:32 Another one: Aaron "The Hawk" Pryor
From 1976 to 1983, he was sensational. AFTER 1983? Say no to drugs, Aaron!
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
You're so easily confused. 7 years being great is a long time.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
So you say he was sensational from '76-'83 but only prime for three years?
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Good calls on Sandoval and Paul. Both looked like longtime champions, until they didn’t. Gaby was a blaster so you were always in danger of getting KO’d by him (unlike his slick-boxing brother Orlando) but I was more shocked by Haugen beating Paul. I kept waiting for Haugen to get dominated in that fight,Seamus wrote: ↑11 May 2020, 16:57 Richie Sandoval looked like a Hall of Famer when he beat Jeff Chandler like a redheaded stepchild, but then Gaby Canizales obliterated him. Lloyd Honeyghan looked unstoppable until Marlon Starling laid a beatdown on him. Jimmy Paul appeared to be headed for stardom until the less talented Greg Haugen imposed his will on him and it was downhill for JP after that.
Another from that era: Hilmer Kenty. Won the belt, defended three times against untaxing competition for a year and then got mugged by O’Grady. He was never the same
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
He wasn't great for 7 years. He was great for 3 years(1980-83). After that, career went downhill because of drug problems.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 17:46 You're so easily confused. 7 years being great is a long time.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
You said he was sensational for 7 years.elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 May 2020, 14:13He wasn't great for 7 years. He was great for 3 years(1980-83). After that, career went downhill because of drug problems.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 17:46 You're so easily confused. 7 years being great is a long time.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
He's sensational!
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 May 2020, 14:13He wasn't great for 7 years. He was great for 3 years(1980-83). After that, career went downhill because of drug problems.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 17:46 You're so easily confused. 7 years being great is a long time.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Nobody is calling Pryor prime in his pro debut, you're the one that put out the years.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Whilst I don't disagree that Gaby absolutely nailed him and gave him a sustained beating for the entire fight, is it not fair to say that he was facing the shell of Sandoval who was severely weight drained. Can't remember figures exactly but it was around a stone he had to lose in the last few days and he only drank water i.e. didn't eat. He was knocked cold for about 15 minutes and actually looked dead. It's said that he stopped breathing from anything from 90 seconds to 3 minutes, which is highly dangerous for the brain. He was still out cold on his way to the hospital.giacomino wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 18:27Good calls on Sandoval and Paul. Both looked like longtime champions, until they didn’t. Gaby was a blaster so you were always in danger of getting KO’d by him (unlike his slick-boxing brother Orlando) but I was more shocked by Haugen beating Paul. I kept waiting for Haugen to get dominated in that fight,Seamus wrote: ↑11 May 2020, 16:57 Richie Sandoval looked like a Hall of Famer when he beat Jeff Chandler like a redheaded stepchild, but then Gaby Canizales obliterated him. Lloyd Honeyghan looked unstoppable until Marlon Starling laid a beatdown on him. Jimmy Paul appeared to be headed for stardom until the less talented Greg Haugen imposed his will on him and it was downhill for JP after that.
Another from that era: Hilmer Kenty. Won the belt, defended three times against untaxing competition for a year and then got mugged by O’Grady. He was never the same
I don't know why he'd not made a defence for almost 18 months or what kept him out but he certainly wasn't anywhere near his fighting weight and was around 130 when he had a non title fight only the month before.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
True, he was having extreme trouble making even close to the weight and he fought a few non-title bouts at featherweight between the bantamweight title fights. Hindsight is 20-20 but he obviously had no business defending his belt so weight drained, especially against a guy like Canizales. He was a shell of the fighter he was when he beat up Jeff Chandlerorbtastic wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 04:51Whilst I don't disagree that Gaby absolutely nailed him and gave him a sustained beating for the entire fight, is it not fair to say that he was facing the shell of Sandoval who was severely weight drained. Can't remember figures exactly but it was around a stone he had to lose in the last few days and he only drank water i.e. didn't eat. He was knocked cold for about 15 minutes and actually looked dead. It's said that he stopped breathing from anything from 90 seconds to 3 minutes, which is highly dangerous for the brain. He was still out cold on his way to the hospital.giacomino wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 18:27
Good calls on Sandoval and Paul. Both looked like longtime champions, until they didn’t. Gaby was a blaster so you were always in danger of getting KO’d by him (unlike his slick-boxing brother Orlando) but I was more shocked by Haugen beating Paul. I kept waiting for Haugen to get dominated in that fight,
Another from that era: Hilmer Kenty. Won the belt, defended three times against untaxing competition for a year and then got mugged by O’Grady. He was never the same
I don't know why he'd not made a defence for almost 18 months or what kept him out but he certainly wasn't anywhere near his fighting weight and was around 130 when he had a non title fight only the month before.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
That doesn't meant that I said prime Pryor started in '76. I said the he looked sensational. You can look sensational even in your over the hill years in some fights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 00:33 Nobody is calling Pryor prime in his pro debut, you're the one that put out the years.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
A drug addicted, eye problem having Jeff Chandler.giacomino wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 11:18True, he was having extreme trouble making even close to the weight and he fought a few non-title bouts at featherweight between the bantamweight title fights. Hindsight is 20-20 but he obviously had no business defending his belt so weight drained, especially against a guy like Canizales. He was a shell of the fighter he was when he beat up Jeff Chandlerorbtastic wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 04:51
Whilst I don't disagree that Gaby absolutely nailed him and gave him a sustained beating for the entire fight, is it not fair to say that he was facing the shell of Sandoval who was severely weight drained. Can't remember figures exactly but it was around a stone he had to lose in the last few days and he only drank water i.e. didn't eat. He was knocked cold for about 15 minutes and actually looked dead. It's said that he stopped breathing from anything from 90 seconds to 3 minutes, which is highly dangerous for the brain. He was still out cold on his way to the hospital.
I don't know why he'd not made a defence for almost 18 months or what kept him out but he certainly wasn't anywhere near his fighting weight and was around 130 when he had a non title fight only the month before.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Please define sensational.elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 12:26That doesn't meant that I said prime Pryor started in '76. I said the he looked sensational. You can look sensational even in your over the hill years in some fights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 00:33 Nobody is calling Pryor prime in his pro debut, you're the one that put out the years.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Go to the dictionary.oogiebe wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 15:46Please define sensational.elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 12:26
That doesn't meant that I said prime Pryor started in '76. I said the he looked sensational. You can look sensational even in your over the hill years in some fights.
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
So I shouldn't reply to you anymore?
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Greatest fighters without longevity
You didn't see Aaron fight in 1976. He wasn't on TV.elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 12:26That doesn't meant that I said prime Pryor started in '76. I said the he looked sensational. You can look sensational even in your over the hill years in some fights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 00:33 Nobody is calling Pryor prime in his pro debut, you're the one that put out the years.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50