Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Just watching Lewis v McCall second fight again. Had it in my head it was one way traffic and The Atomic Bull was just crying throughout. However he was quite competitive first two rounds. Third round Lewis caught him with three heavy right hands in about 45 seconds and McCall starts throwing shapes with his hands. Then looking out of the ring.
End of R3 he doesn’t go back to his corner. Just pacing around like a creepy c**t. Trainer George Benton (who didn’t look happy during the pre fight preliminaries) just looks disgusted but not massively surprised so wonder how bad his training was for this fight?
Round four doesn’t throw a punch apart from a single jab after about two minutes of the round. Just walking about like a sitting duck.
Bursts out crying end of R4. Eventually sits down in his corner. Mills Lane has a word and amazingly let’s it continue.
McCall’s chin was legendary. But f**k knows what was going on between his ears on that night. Do we know if he got paid for this fight?
End of R3 he doesn’t go back to his corner. Just pacing around like a creepy c**t. Trainer George Benton (who didn’t look happy during the pre fight preliminaries) just looks disgusted but not massively surprised so wonder how bad his training was for this fight?
Round four doesn’t throw a punch apart from a single jab after about two minutes of the round. Just walking about like a sitting duck.
Bursts out crying end of R4. Eventually sits down in his corner. Mills Lane has a word and amazingly let’s it continue.
McCall’s chin was legendary. But f**k knows what was going on between his ears on that night. Do we know if he got paid for this fight?
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
He had his purse suspended and then was fined.
One thing is for sure. Don got paid.
McCall will have seen “some” money after the usual DK purse trickerations but more than likely smoked it anyway.
One thing is for sure. Don got paid.
McCall will have seen “some” money after the usual DK purse trickerations but more than likely smoked it anyway.
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Another interesting footnote was King coming to the ring with him. Like literally behind him during the ring walk. Never saw that before or since with The Don’. Had he done this previously with his fighters?
He probably knew McCall was in a bad way and didn’t trust him to make it to the ring?
He probably knew McCall was in a bad way and didn’t trust him to make it to the ring?
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Yes, quite a dissatisfying revenge for Lennox Lewis.
As stated McCall fought for a couple of rounds, then when Lewis started unloading on him he quickly unravelled mentally.
McCall was suffering from substance abuse issues I think, so that's what was behind it.
Evidently McCall was a very hard man to stop, this being his only stoppage loss, and him sparring Tyson for dozens of rounds.
As stated McCall fought for a couple of rounds, then when Lewis started unloading on him he quickly unravelled mentally.
McCall was suffering from substance abuse issues I think, so that's what was behind it.
Evidently McCall was a very hard man to stop, this being his only stoppage loss, and him sparring Tyson for dozens of rounds.
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
I think Bruno said McCall was sobbing in their fight in 95 too.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
I agree,Bruno just hung on to beat a shell of a drug addict and after watching it myself last week was wondering if McCall did get paid in the end
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
I knew a former cornerman who knew McCall. He couldn't stand him, said he only associated with criminal types, gang members, drug dealers etc, he was an accident waiting to happen 24-7.
-
revpickles
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 79
- Joined: 04 Sep 2018, 07:47
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
He had mental issues, he lost his mother and he was addicted to Golden Brown. Very sad, he shouldn't have been in the same ring.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
I'm sure Don King would have made sure he was ok moneywiserevpickles wrote: ↑24 May 2020, 12:13He had mental issues, he lost his mother and he was addicted to Golden Brown. Very sad, he shouldn't have been in the same ring.
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Was crack with McCall. Not heroin. Can anyone ever recall Don King walking into the ring with any of his fighters? If not, Wonder if he did so on this occasion as he wasn’t convinced The Atomic Bull would get there otherwise.revpickles wrote: ↑24 May 2020, 12:13He had mental issues, he lost his mother and he was addicted to Golden Brown. Very sad, he shouldn't have been in the same ring.
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Returning the favour to Bruno for the McClelland fight!
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Obviously it wasn't as bad as vs Lewis, but I definately believe McCall had a mini breakdown vs Bruno - he just didn't want to be there that night.
Jim Watt's commentary for the Lewis rematch was the first (and possibly) only time I have seen him way off in the calling of the fight (not meaning score cards). He was praising McCall at the start of the his antics, calling him "one of boxings real hard men". Yes he was taking shots flush, but there was no call for any praise for that performance. He twigged it by the end and was slagging him off, but he usually calls it correct from the off (okay I know some people might post the "he quit" comment for McClellan but I can forgive him for that one).
Jim Watt's commentary for the Lewis rematch was the first (and possibly) only time I have seen him way off in the calling of the fight (not meaning score cards). He was praising McCall at the start of the his antics, calling him "one of boxings real hard men". Yes he was taking shots flush, but there was no call for any praise for that performance. He twigged it by the end and was slagging him off, but he usually calls it correct from the off (okay I know some people might post the "he quit" comment for McClellan but I can forgive him for that one).
Re: Lewis v McCall II Revisited
Yeah, you couldn't miss him at ringside from a tv perspective. I found myself getting distracted and looking at Bruno rather than the action during the middle of the fight.