thoughts on the long count
thoughts on the long count
Re: thoughts on the long count
a sensationalised non-issue. jack
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
Re: thoughts on the long count
i agree i hate to see a fighter counted out when he is genuinely getting up and misses the count by a second or 2 , you know when a fighter dont want it no more , and these seconds mean nothing in advantage really , i think it is from the old cheating days take a kneeman wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:41 a sensationalised non-issue. jack
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
Re: thoughts on the long count
If you listen to the fight you get that impression. If you time it, it appeared GF was a fraction of a second late. Sounds like he got up @ 8, but it may have been the fight announcer counting.man wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:41 a sensationalised non-issue. jack
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
Re: thoughts on the long count
Foreman was counted out. Period. He didn't complain one bit after Clayton waived it off. Non-issue.brilo33 wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:48i agree i hate to see a fighter counted out when he is genuinely getting up and misses the count by a second or 2 , you know when a fighter dont want it no more , and these seconds mean nothing in advantage really , i think it is from the old cheating days take a kneeman wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:41 a sensationalised non-issue. jack
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
Re: thoughts on the long count
I don't think Foreman's lack of protest answers the issue, but a stopwatch does. But either way he was cooked.oogiebe wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:52Foreman was counted out. Period. He didn't complain one bit after Clayton waived it off. Non-issue.brilo33 wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:48
i agree i hate to see a fighter counted out when he is genuinely getting up and misses the count by a second or 2 , you know when a fighter dont want it no more , and these seconds mean nothing in advantage really , i think it is from the old cheating days take a knee
Re: thoughts on the long count
If Dempsey had gone to a neutral corner immediately, it looked like Gene would have gotten up at the count of, 7,8, or 9.
Of course if Gene was slow like Foreman, or like Quarry against Chuvalo, we may have seen a rubber match.
Of course if Gene was slow like Foreman, or like Quarry against Chuvalo, we may have seen a rubber match.
Re: thoughts on the long count
Ref's count and seconds aren't necessarily the same.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
Foreman isn't interesting at all, it's just a bunch of people getting confused and thinking Sheridan was the official countkeeper, he exhausted and finishedman wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:41 a sensationalised non-issue. jack
forgot the new rule, the ref did what
he was supposed to do and tunney
was clearly able to beat the count
with ease.
way more interesting yet way less
sensationalised or even talked about
is the fact that George Foreman did
beat the count against Ali at the end
of the round, yet was not allowed to
continue.
Tunney's case is more interesting since he got up and won the fight. Often in cases like this I think the boxer is following the count and in control, but Tunney doesn't even look at the ref until he's been down for what would've been 9. Not sure he was really aware where the ref was at before that. If Dempsey had gone straight to the corner it's conceivable Tunney would've been counted out
Re: thoughts on the long count
but the issuse is what is an extra couple of seconds any way . it aint a huge advange any way , i mean low blows are the biggest way to cheat time in your favour
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
Well a few seconds can be the difference between getting counted out and not getting counted out
Re: thoughts on the long count
we know that mggie , but should it be ?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 17:12 Well a few seconds can be the difference between getting counted out and not getting counted out
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
Gotta draw the line somewhere
You not think count outs should be a thing?
You not think count outs should be a thing?
Re: thoughts on the long count
i do , but what i said is i think it is more for the reff to give the fighter a once over to see if he is able to continue ,so if he stars a little late or slow dont think that has a big bearing on a fight than counting a fighter out to quickmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 17:16 Gotta draw the line somewhere
You not think count outs should be a thing?
Re: thoughts on the long count
X2oogiebe wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:52Foreman was counted out. Period. He didn't complain one bit after Clayton waived it off. Non-issue.brilo33 wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 16:48
i agree i hate to see a fighter counted out when he is genuinely getting up and misses the count by a second or 2 , you know when a fighter dont want it no more , and these seconds mean nothing in advantage really , i think it is from the old cheating days take a knee
Foreman's gloves were still on the floor at ten
Re: thoughts on the long count
Rules are if a fighter is unable to get up after a count of ten, the fight is over. You want a rule change?brilo33 wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 17:22i do , but what i said is i think it is more for the reff to give the fighter a once over to see if he is able to continue ,so if he stars a little late or slow dont think that has a big bearing on a fight than counting a fighter out to quickmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 17:16 Gotta draw the line somewhere
You not think count outs should be a thing?
Re: thoughts on the long count
no i dont think it needs to be, i was just saying fights like tunney might of had a slighty longer count , i dont think it should be taken away from the win,
Re: thoughts on the long count
Re: thoughts on the long count
,exactly ,even the fury wilder first fight when people say fury got an extra half second count he never , ,it means nothing there is also loads of fights when a reff has given a slow count to a boxer who doesnt want to get up either,
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
Now what if Dempsey went back to the corner straight away, but the ref just stood there, waiting 5 seconds to start counting, and then Tunney stumbles up at 9.5 and wins. Would that take away from the win at all do you think.
Re: thoughts on the long count
Yeah, but that didn't happen.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:07Now what if Dempsey went back to the corner straight away, but the ref just stood there, waiting 5 seconds to start counting, and then Tunney stumbles up at 9.5 and wins. Would that take away from the win at all do you think.
Re: thoughts on the long count
thank god you wrote that. i thought this rum is sending me of me nutoogiebe wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:10Yeah, but that didn't happen.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:07
Now what if Dempsey went back to the corner straight away, but the ref just stood there, waiting 5 seconds to start counting, and then Tunney stumbles up at 9.5 and wins. Would that take away from the win at all do you think.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
Duh, most of what we talk about never happened, just curious what he thinks of that scenariooogiebe wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:10Yeah, but that didn't happen.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:07
Now what if Dempsey went back to the corner straight away, but the ref just stood there, waiting 5 seconds to start counting, and then Tunney stumbles up at 9.5 and wins. Would that take away from the win at all do you think.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39234
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: thoughts on the long count
i get what your saying , maybe in rules of the game wise yes , but that is what iam getting at , the count is a bit of a pain in boxing.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 May 2020, 18:07Now what if Dempsey went back to the corner straight away, but the ref just stood there, waiting 5 seconds to start counting, and then Tunney stumbles up at 9.5 and wins. Would that take away from the win at all do you think.