Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

The Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

The 1990's
58
82%
Now
13
18%
 
Total votes: 71

gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Shhhh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:58
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:55

You call it nostalgia. I call it better fighters in better fights.
I don’t know. In the last 2 years we’ve had Tyson fury 1 and 2 and joshua getting battered by a pizza eater. Those fights buzzed me and I’m a cynical bastard. Can’t remember when Wlad Joshua was but that was pretty good too
2016

The 90's gave us the Holyfield vs Bowe trilogy, Foreman coming back at 45 to win the title, Ibeabuchi vs Tua, Holyfield vs Tyson 1 and 2, Lewis vs Mercer, Holyfield vs Bert Cooper, The biggest upset in the history of sports with Tyson vs Douglas

And quite a few other entertaining fights, and fighters.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

oogiebe wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:02 It is the greatest British era of HW's.
Now that is an absolute fact I'd say.

Fury vs Anthony Joshua will easily be the biggest Heavyweight Fight in the history of the U.K. and it's not even close.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

oogiebe wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:01
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:55

You call it nostalgia. I call it better fighters in better fights.
:TU: There were so many mini rivalries going on in the nineties. Holy/Bowe; Holy/Tyson; Holy/Lewis. (holy shite!). You had Golota/Bowe; Lewis/Rahman; so many better fighters (see all the mentions). THe greatest upset in HW history (Tyson/Douglas). Big George's comeback to become oldest HW champ ever. I wouldn't rank today's division as even the third best. Maybe not fourth. It is competitive but not great. The only drama today is when does AJ face Fury. Or AJ face Wilder. What else is there?
Yes on everything except Lewis/Rahman. That was 2001.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Shhhh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:05
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:03

2016

The 90's gave us the Holyfield vs Bowe trilogy, Foreman coming back at 45 to win the title, Ibeabuchi vs Tua, Holyfield vs Tyson 1 and 2, Lewis vs Mercer, Holyfield vs Bert Cooper, The biggest upset in the history of sports with Tyson vs Douglas

And quite a few other entertaining fights, and fighters.
Yeah maybe I’m just thankful that the division is interesting after the klit snore years
It's definitely the most exciting it's been SINCE the 90's I don't think anybody would disagree with that. The main problem during the Klitschko era was just that there was really nobody that posed a big threat or really caught people's imagination as a contender. He never really had a defining big challenger to go up against. Just a bunch of decent wins over a long period of time.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by oogiebe »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:05
oogiebe wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:01
:TU: There were so many mini rivalries going on in the nineties. Holy/Bowe; Holy/Tyson; Holy/Lewis. (holy shite!). You had Golota/Bowe; Lewis/Rahman; so many better fighters (see all the mentions). THe greatest upset in HW history (Tyson/Douglas). Big George's comeback to become oldest HW champ ever. I wouldn't rank today's division as even the third best. Maybe not fourth. It is competitive but not great. The only drama today is when does AJ face Fury. Or AJ face Wilder. What else is there?
Yes on everything except Lewis/Rahman. That was 2001.
I was going by memory of the era.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Paci »

The last era feelt like it started after the Holmes-years since he was hated and people still have a grudge with him. And ended for me with Lewis retirement since he beat all names sort of. No oldies thou.
As mentioned it was full of all kinds of stories and weirdness. Hard to top really, but the real era before it was the one with Ali, Frazier and Foreman among others.
This started around 2017? Last one was in 85 and ended in 03 or 04. Going by decade makes things static and stupid in my head since eras overlap decades.

Great era and crazy in many ways. The only one sort of left is McCall... wtf?

This era got something going for it. The guys needs to make statements. Who have done it? The 4 top guys have. More are coming up and it might be a wild ride since this crop grown up in 90s and knows that at steak even it comes to legacy since the money is back in the game. Fingers crossed that we will get some huge fights down the line with Fury-Wilder 3 coming, and Chisora-Usyk not leaving out that AJ always brings it more or less at least he comes to win every time. Pulev ain't easy but he will be stopped before 3 by AJ.
Wondering wtf, Ruiz next move will be. And that the Joyce-Dubois also. Whyte has fight another inbetween fight with somebody around the Top 10 again. Should get a crack at Fury but, money is money and AJ brings in loads of it.

As long as relevant fights are made and more gems pops up it gonna be a good era that has started off well. Also, that Wlad-bastard is thinking about it. But nothing has happen there.

Solid so far, it has taken its time to get going. And nostaglia makes you forget loads of details around things that happend. Like the top 10 that is the only thing that matters other then we do have a lineal champr a guy who beat the guy on top of it.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Yes it is true that eras overlap. All of the key players of 90's Heavyweight Boxing were around in the late 80's, and many of them still around in the early 2000's.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Paci »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:40 Yes it is true that eras overlap. All of the key players of 90's Heavyweight Boxing were around in the late 80's, and many of them still around in the early 2000's.
And early 2010s....
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Paci wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:41
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:40 Yes it is true that eras overlap. All of the key players of 90's Heavyweight Boxing were around in the late 80's, and many of them still around in the early 2000's.
And early 2010s....
Yeah, but looking very past it by then
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Paci »

Can't watch Toney past 05...

I don't think that Foreman's record will be broken thou. It is one of the tallest orders among legacies that left their mark last time out.

I don't see anyone break it. Most be lineal, btw. No org-trinkets.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Paci wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:47 Can't watch Toney past 05...

I don't think that Foreman's record will be broken thou. It is one of the tallest orders among legacies that left their mark last time out.

I don't see anyone break it. Most be lineal, btw. No org-trinkets.
Foreman's record has already been broken overall. Not at Heavyweight though.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Enlightened-One »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:23
Enlightened-One wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:20
The 1990’s covers an entire decade.

And if you’re referring to now, then I assume you are asking us to comment on either the situation today or since the start of the year, which includes a global pandemic that prevented the sport from taking place.

Therefore, if my interpretation of your question is correct, then you shouldn’t have even bothered to waste people’s time by creating this thread in the first place.

You’re better than this, so you must try harder.
I would say the now can include the years setting the stage for the scene we have now as well as the present day.

I'd say the modern era as we know it started in about 2015 I suppose. That's when it officially became the Post-Wlad era.

The next few years to come can still indeed yield some memorable moments. We shall see.
Thanks for the clarification, I’ll respond tomorrow. :TU:
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1674
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:07
Shhhh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:05
Yeah maybe I’m just thankful that the division is interesting after the klit snore years
It's definitely the most exciting it's been SINCE the 90's I don't think anybody would disagree with that. The main problem during the Klitschko era was just that there was really nobody that posed a big threat or really caught people's imagination as a contender. He never really had a defining big challenger to go up against. Just a bunch of decent wins over a long period of time.
Tyson Fury entered the rankings in 2011. I think he would have posed a major threat to Wladimir had they fought earlier say 2012 or 2013. The same with Deontay Wilder.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46238
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by gilgamesh »

Cojimar 1946 wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 20:50
gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:07

It's definitely the most exciting it's been SINCE the 90's I don't think anybody would disagree with that. The main problem during the Klitschko era was just that there was really nobody that posed a big threat or really caught people's imagination as a contender. He never really had a defining big challenger to go up against. Just a bunch of decent wins over a long period of time.
Tyson Fury entered the rankings in 2011. I think he would have posed a major threat to Wladimir had they fought earlier say 2012 or 2013. The same with Deontay Wilder.
I think Wilder picked the right time and opponent to make his move for a Heavyweight Title. In retrospect, yes it's possible Fury could've beaten Wlad earlier than he did.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Going by a decade...

Tyson
Holyfield
Lewis
Bowe
Foreman

V

Wilder
Joshua
Fury
Wlad k
Vitali k

2nd tier

Moorer
Mercer
Golota
Tua
Holmes
Briggs

V
Povetkin
Whyte
Pulev
Ruiz
Haye
Ortiz


Sure i missed some feel free to add
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Paci »

gilgamesh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 20:08
Paci wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 19:47 Can't watch Toney past 05...

I don't think that Foreman's record will be broken thou. It is one of the tallest orders among legacies that left their mark last time out.

I don't see anyone break it. Most be lineal, btw. No org-trinkets.
Foreman's record has already been broken overall. Not at Heavyweight though.
True enough(no lineal thou), who was she now again?
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Thomastearns »

The 90s was better no doubt, but it had one huge hole in it - Mike Tyson went missing, and left a vaccum behind, and then returned a different fighter.

Things got so bad that an overweight, long retired George Foreman was able to return and bring some perspective back despite boxing in slow motion.

He wasn't too far off knocking out a peak Evander Holyfield in 1991 and then went on to stop Moorer a few years later.

The 1970s was the era for judging heavyweight boxing against, (the 60s was mainly Clay/Ali delivering a sublime boxing masterclass).

The current scene is plagued with business preventing the big fights from happening. Otherwise, it could and should be great.

Can't even blame Covid either as the next biggie wasn't happening til Oct/Nov anyway.

By the time Joshua faces Wilder, if he ever does, Ali would have had a trilogy against both Frazier and Norton.

I think all this business / politics angle actually began in the 1990s as before then there was very little trouble in getting the big fights made.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9004
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Syntax Error »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 21:58 Going by a decade...

Tyson
Holyfield
Lewis
Bowe
Foreman

V

Wilder
Joshua
Fury
Wlad k
Vitali k

2nd tier

Moorer
Mercer
Golota
Tua
Holmes
Briggs

V
Povetkin
Whyte
Pulev
Ruiz
Haye
Ortiz


Sure i missed some feel free to add
Got to add Ruddock, Ibeabuchi and Morrison to the 90s second tier.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9004
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Syntax Error »

Shhhh wrote: 12 Jun 2020, 18:29 Nostalgia will sway the vote
Nothing to do with nostalgia.

The Bowe/Holyfield trilogy alone puts the 90s on top.

Bowe dropped a trinket to fight Holyfield a third time: I very doubt that would happen today.
saad1000
Lightweight
Posts: 31
Joined: 27 May 2018, 13:44

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by saad1000 »

The 90's was "better" but it wasn't more exciting.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by DrDuke »

saad1000 wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:35 The 90's was "better" but it wasn't more exciting.
Holyfield's career of the 90s alone was more exciting, than the current era up to the date.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

saad1000 wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:35 The 90's was "better" but it wasn't more exciting.
Id put the best top level hw fights as:

Wlad v Joshua
Joshua v ruiz
Wilder v Ortiz
Whyte v Chisora


Holyfield v Bowe
Mercer v Lewis
Holyfield v Tyson
Tua v Ike
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5710
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

DrDuke wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:47
saad1000 wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:35 The 90's was "better" but it wasn't more exciting.
Holyfield's career of the 90s alone was more exciting, than the current era up to the date.
Joshua isnt done and hes been in some thrillers
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by DrDuke »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:52
DrDuke wrote: 13 Jun 2020, 09:47

Holyfield's career of the 90s alone was more exciting, than the current era up to the date.
Joshua isnt done and hes been in some thrillers
Yeah, this era isn't over yet. There even wasn't a fight to determine its true leader, which is Fury-Joshua bout. But for the current moment the 90s are clearly filled with more exciting fights.
Paci
Middleweight
Posts: 1532
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 09:49

Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing

Post by Paci »

Still thou, this era is young and we haven't seen all of the best fighting the best as of yet. But if the money is right, this will be awesome but still depending on well... the fights that comes out of it.

Right now, by going by stats like EO in great fights, it has a tallorder to pass over the Tyson-Holyfield-Lewis era. But, it has started with some great fights. Need to check how many fights of the year and so on. Like what is it, two of them against one? But, still many classics.

Im postive and being in the minority of the rest of you cynical bastards.
Post Reply