Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
1990s had better action.
Now has more interesting characters. Fury and Wilder are tough to beat in that department.
Now has more interesting characters. Fury and Wilder are tough to beat in that department.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
HE was Bernard Hopkins, and yes he broke his own record for the Lineal title as well as his own record with just a World Title that wasn't considered lineal later.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Oh yeah. I forgotten about that... 46 right against Pascal and again 48 when he got a paper strap? I did edit this a bunch of times and fact checked myself twice
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5710
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Boxing overall was better in the 90s. Its not that fighters were necessarily better but the upper echelon fought each other more frequently
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
I don't think they really did. Most of the 90's was people arguing over who was ducking who. You had a heavyweight championship fight ended for a holding DQ. You had a guy cry in the ring in a heavyweight title fight and not throw a punch. Yes, some big fights were made. But they are being made now, too.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 14:08 Boxing overall was better in the 90s. Its not that fighters were necessarily better but the upper echelon fought each other more frequently
Living through the 90's, everyone bitched about exactly the same stuff they bitch about now.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
What was the Championship fight that ended in a holding DQ in the 90's?saad1000 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 14:44I don't think they really did. Most of the 90's was people arguing over who was ducking who. You had a heavyweight championship fight ended for a holding DQ. You had a guy cry in the ring in a heavyweight title fight and not throw a punch. Yes, some big fights were made. But they are being made now, too.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 14:08 Boxing overall was better in the 90s. Its not that fighters were necessarily better but the upper echelon fought each other more frequently
Living through the 90's, everyone bitched about exactly the same stuff they bitch about now.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Lennox Lewis-Henry Akinwandegilgamesh wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 15:47What was the Championship fight that ended in a holding DQ in the 90's?saad1000 wrote: ↑13 Jun 2020, 14:44
I don't think they really did. Most of the 90's was people arguing over who was ducking who. You had a heavyweight championship fight ended for a holding DQ. You had a guy cry in the ring in a heavyweight title fight and not throw a punch. Yes, some big fights were made. But they are being made now, too.
Living through the 90's, everyone bitched about exactly the same stuff they bitch about now.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
There are always fun fights and big fights to be made since it is all relative to the talent available.
In terms of overall talent of the division it's pretty terrible right now, but that doesn't mean it can't be fun.
It's also worth noting that most people just like to whinge and dislike the era they are currently living through.
In terms of overall talent of the division it's pretty terrible right now, but that doesn't mean it can't be fun.
It's also worth noting that most people just like to whinge and dislike the era they are currently living through.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Something that happend during that era was just wtf.
McCalls break down for one. Damn. Or other weirdness like Morrison fighting HIV-postive.... f*ck. Sick bastard when you think about it.
McCalls break down for one. Damn. Or other weirdness like Morrison fighting HIV-postive.... f*ck. Sick bastard when you think about it.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
There are fun fights to be made now, just depends if they happen, AJ probably has the best current resume, and compare that to holifeilds 90s notable fights
-Busta duglus
-george forman
-larry holmes
-Riddick bowe x2
-michael moore x2
-mike tyson x2
-lennox lewis x2
Imagine anyone building a decade like this in this era, Hope people start being willing to take 5050s and grow resumes cause looking back i respect a stackeddd holifeild 44-10 a lot more than a current wilder 43-1, or AJ 23-1 or fury 30-0.
But hopefuly they all start to step up and fight the best cause theres some quality to be made. UFC making losses ok again hopefuly washes onto boxing and 2020's can have all the top 5 round robins going nuts.
-Busta duglus
-george forman
-larry holmes
-Riddick bowe x2
-michael moore x2
-mike tyson x2
-lennox lewis x2
Imagine anyone building a decade like this in this era, Hope people start being willing to take 5050s and grow resumes cause looking back i respect a stackeddd holifeild 44-10 a lot more than a current wilder 43-1, or AJ 23-1 or fury 30-0.
But hopefuly they all start to step up and fight the best cause theres some quality to be made. UFC making losses ok again hopefuly washes onto boxing and 2020's can have all the top 5 round robins going nuts.
-
Thomastearns
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
gregregegg wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 01:29 There are fun fights to be made now, just depends if they happen, AJ probably has the best current resume, and compare that to holifeilds 90s notable fights
-Busta duglus
-george forman
-larry holmes
-Riddick bowe x2
-michael moore x2
-mike tyson x2
-lennox lewis x2
Imagine anyone building a decade like this in this era, Hope people start being willing to take 5050s and grow resumes cause looking back i respect a stackeddd holifeild 44-10 a lot more than a current wilder 43-1, or AJ 23-1 or fury 30-0.
But hopefuly they all start to step up and fight the best cause theres some quality to be made. UFC making losses ok again hopefuly washes onto boxing and 2020's can have all the top 5 round robins going nuts.
At the end of the day it comes down to an economic transaction. They want our money we want the big fights but they won't give them to us but still want our money.
They need to understand they got competition now they never had. It was their stupid greedy attitude that fed the rise of firstly WWF and then later UFC. People got bored with boxing and all it's drug cheats and corrupt decisions etc.
For sure there's more money knocking around now, the western world is spilling over with money, at least for now, but doesn't mean they're going to always get it off us so easily in the future.
I'm glad Anthony Joshua is the biggest star as he clearly has the best resume to date, and the fans know it.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
I don't understand this. There's absolutely no proof Morrison had HIV in '89, and no need to call him a sick b*astard for intentionally fighting with it. Why on earth would you go with the worse case scenario when it's clearly something someone just made up?
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Im cynical as f*ck and I try to keep it real. So much BS around this and contradiction all over the place around it all.punchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 11:25I don't understand this. There's absolutely no proof Morrison had HIV in '89, and no need to call him a sick b*astard for intentionally fighting with it. Why on earth would you go with the worse case scenario when it's clearly something someone just made up?
Edit
I Googled this when I lurked around. And yeah, sorry to however is his fans. But yeah...
So yeah? Lets leave it here.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
I stand corrected as feckPaci wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 11:34Im cynical as f*ck and I try to keep it real. So much BS around this and contradiction all over the place around it all.punchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 11:25
I don't understand this. There's absolutely no proof Morrison had HIV in '89, and no need to call him a sick b*astard for intentionally fighting with it. Why on earth would you go with the worse case scenario when it's clearly something someone just made up?
Edit
I Googled this when I lurked around. And yeah, sorry to however is his fans. But yeah...
So yeah? Lets leave it here.
Is all the supposed "proof" he never had HIV at all bs in your opinion then?
Article about it here: https://www.sportscasting.com/boxer-tom ... o-experts/
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Yes, it's BS.punchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 12:01 I stand corrected as feckI've never seen this before.
Is all the supposed "proof" he never had HIV at all bs in your opinion then?
Article about it here: https://www.sportscasting.com/boxer-tom ... o-experts/
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
I don't claim to be an HIV expert, but wouldn't Kenzie have been born with HIV if Tommy had been positive back then? I personally believe Tommy had HIV, but he was also a pathological liar and meth can definitely eat away at your body before killing you early. I've also known people personally who came up with some crazy lies to cover their meth use. I never understood the negative tests that followed, unless all of those samples were not Tommy's blood.saad1000 wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 12:36Yes, it's BS.punchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 12:01 I stand corrected as feckI've never seen this before.
Is all the supposed "proof" he never had HIV at all bs in your opinion then?
Article about it here: https://www.sportscasting.com/boxer-tom ... o-experts/
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Or he paid a Doctor to claim it was negative.punchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 12:57I don't claim to be an HIV expert, but wouldn't Kenzie have been born with HIV if Tommy had been positive back then? I personally believe Tommy had HIV, but he was also a pathological liar and meth can definitely eat away at your body before killing you early. I've also known people personally who came up with some crazy lies to cover their meth use. I never understood the negative tests that followed, unless all of those samples were not Tommy's blood.
For the record, I doubt he had it way back in 1989 because it would've been detected sooner if he had, but he may have contracted it before he tested positive.
Wouldn't have been too long though. It shows up on the test pretty quickly as I understand it.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Who knows. He f*ck'd up big and didn't care if he spread it to others also covering it up makes everything crazier and worse. Sick bastard.
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
Now's pretty good but the 90's were better!
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5710
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Better era of Heavyweight Boxing
No. Can pass through mothers blood. Not fatherspunchoutsb wrote: ↑14 Jun 2020, 12:57I don't claim to be an HIV expert, but wouldn't Kenzie have been born with HIV if Tommy had been positive back then? I personally believe Tommy had HIV, but he was also a pathological liar and meth can definitely eat away at your body before killing you early. I've also known people personally who came up with some crazy lies to cover their meth use. I never understood the negative tests that followed, unless all of those samples were not Tommy's blood.