Barkley most certainly was great my man, to keep coming back war after war and scoring upset after upset, incrediblejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 09:31Prince Charles Williams and Iran Barkley were not great fighters. They were good fighters.
Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Agree with everything but froch over Joe.black panther wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 10:11This.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑19 Jun 2020, 10:52 I'd say it's a fair list, of course you could argue Calzaghe is rated above him, but i would say it's close as Calzaghe fought a lot of very soft competition during that reign, it was laughable at times.
In my mind Calzaghe would have beaten Froch handily. But we can’t rank boxers on potential, we have to base it on actual results right?
In which case as much as I think Froch is a strange character, Froch’s resume is arguably better than Calzaghe and in my opinion he’s justified in ranking himself above Joe.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
I'm not your man, and Barkley was a very tough hombre, but a great he was not.Isaax wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 10:21Barkley most certainly was great my man, to keep coming back war after war and scoring upset after upset, incrediblejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 09:31
Prince Charles Williams and Iran Barkley were not great fighters. They were good fighters.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
If overcoming the adversity he did isn't great, I don't know what is. Just look at the punishment he endured against Hearns, eyes cut up and swelling, before wiping him out
WBC, WBA and IBF champ at three diff weights without hand speed, fleet feet, head movement or punching technique
Definition of great
WBC, WBA and IBF champ at three diff weights without hand speed, fleet feet, head movement or punching technique
Definition of great
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
And Iran was the favourite against Toney of course
The most masterful display of boxing at top level I've seen to this day, that night from Lights Out
The most masterful display of boxing at top level I've seen to this day, that night from Lights Out
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
It’s a definition of great, sure.Isaax wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 13:33 If overcoming the adversity he did isn't great, I don't know what is. Just look at the punishment he endured against Hearns, eyes cut up and swelling, before wiping him out
WBC, WBA and IBF champ at three diff weights without hand speed, fleet feet, head movement or punching technique
Definition of great
Just a really bad one that nobody will agree with
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
He took on the very best of the best ffs Hearns x2, Duran, peak Kalambay, peak Nunn, peak Benn, peak Toney- and arguably won all the fights other than Kalambay, Benn & Toney, had Nunn moonwalking, running & using slack ropes to dope him
Had Hearns out cleaner than Hagler did and amazingly outboxed him second time!!
Did better against Kalambay than McCallum did, fight of the year with Duran, underdog against Olajide and Van Horn and beat the shit out of them. What more do you want
Closet classics with Sims and Williams, I mean all out wars. Beat up ESPN stars Kinchen and Tinley. Come on, the bloke was fornicating great, best one round brawl ever with Benn etc etc
Had Hearns out cleaner than Hagler did and amazingly outboxed him second time!!
Did better against Kalambay than McCallum did, fight of the year with Duran, underdog against Olajide and Van Horn and beat the shit out of them. What more do you want
Closet classics with Sims and Williams, I mean all out wars. Beat up ESPN stars Kinchen and Tinley. Come on, the bloke was fornicating great, best one round brawl ever with Benn etc etc
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
The only surprise here is that Carl hasn't put himself at Number 1.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Ultimately with all this context is key. Due to politics and the cowardice of others, Toney couldn't get any big fights at super middle except for the big one, which he took.
Calzaghe could have had many big fights but he ducked them all until the bitter end. He could have even fought prime Roy Jones, but he preferred 40 yr old Roy Jones.
I doubt whether the people dismissing Toney would bet money against him if he was actually boxing some of the fellas they're ranking above him.
Calzaghe could have had many big fights but he ducked them all until the bitter end. He could have even fought prime Roy Jones, but he preferred 40 yr old Roy Jones.
I doubt whether the people dismissing Toney would bet money against him if he was actually boxing some of the fellas they're ranking above him.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39338
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Coulda woulda shoulda
Though not as bad as the Nunn stuff, if he was some elite smw ATG what were Liles and f@cking Steve Little
Though not as bad as the Nunn stuff, if he was some elite smw ATG what were Liles and f@cking Steve Little
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
He certainly was by most experts and all bookies, after Toney's many mediocre displays post-Nunn looking as though he lost against Reggie Johnson, ancient (in them days) Mike McCallum and average Dave Tiberi (clearly) and Barkley's form v The Schoolboy DVH & Tommy @ 175
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
In Britain, the only one who picked Toney was Eubank. Eubank saying Toney had too much 'craft' for the 'slugger' Barkley and would 'out maneuver him all night with superior boxing craft' and suggested Watt, McGuigan, Mason, Benn, Andries, Lewis etc didn't know boxing like he did
Last edited by Isaax on 24 Jun 2020, 05:05, edited 1 time in total.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Not buying it.Isaax wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:02He certainly was by most experts and all bookies, after Toney's many mediocre displays post-Nunn looking as though he lost against Reggie Johnson, ancient (in them days) Mike McCallum and average Dave Tiberi (clearly) and Barkley's form v The Schoolboy DVH & Tommy @ 175
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Great fun to watch, for sure, but A great, no.Isaax wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 13:33 If overcoming the adversity he did isn't great, I don't know what is. Just look at the punishment he endured against Hearns, eyes cut up and swelling, before wiping him out
WBC, WBA and IBF champ at three diff weights without hand speed, fleet feet, head movement or punching technique
Definition of great
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Not buying it? Umm well that's the way it was, making Toneys showing even more breathtaking consideringOnetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:05Not buying it.Isaax wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:02
He certainly was by most experts and all bookies, after Toney's many mediocre displays post-Nunn looking as though he lost against Reggie Johnson, ancient (in them days) Mike McCallum and average Dave Tiberi (clearly) and Barkley's form v The Schoolboy DVH & Tommy @ 175
In The Ring, it was 100% votes for Julian Jackson to beat Toney if they fought, Toney chose Barkley instead and Foreman etc considered it even tougher than high P4P JJ
16m25s to 17m20s the kinda thoughts at the time
In hindsight we know Toney was the goods though and that McCallum wasn't old by today's standards
Last edited by Isaax on 24 Jun 2020, 05:29, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
13m to 15m
Odds swayed back to Barkley before fight
Eubank was literally the only fighter/trainer/pundit on either side of the Atlantic picking Toney
Benn and Hearns went for Barkley big
Odds swayed back to Barkley before fight
Eubank was literally the only fighter/trainer/pundit on either side of the Atlantic picking Toney
Benn and Hearns went for Barkley big
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Can't go along with that m8jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:10Great fun to watch, for sure, but A great, no.Isaax wrote: ↑23 Jun 2020, 13:33 If overcoming the adversity he did isn't great, I don't know what is. Just look at the punishment he endured against Hearns, eyes cut up and swelling, before wiping him out
WBC, WBA and IBF champ at three diff weights without hand speed, fleet feet, head movement or punching technique
Definition of great
What made Ali and Duran and Hagler and Robinson so great was coming back from all their losses to reign again, if they didn't lose and come back they wouldn't be looked at as great
Adversity defines it, overcoming or crumbling
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Well you have whatever personal definition of greatness you like, but I'm afraid you'll find very few people will be agreeing with you.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Maybe not keyboard warriors on some Internet forumjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:34Well you have whatever personal definition of greatness you like, but I'm afraid you'll find very few people will be agreeing with you.
Teddy Atlas considers Barkley truly great and in 100 years they will
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
So now the odds swayed, but before all the bookies went for Barkley?
Put a sock in it, you're embarrassing yourself mate.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45235
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Oh, do piss off.Isaax wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:36Maybe not keyboard warriors on some Internet forumjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:34
Well you have whatever personal definition of greatness you like, but I'm afraid you'll find very few people will be agreeing with you.
Teddy Atlas considers Barkley truly great and in 100 years they will
Go troll somewhere else.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
I remember someone once commenting that if you beat a legend you become a legendjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑24 Jun 2020, 05:34Well you have whatever personal definition of greatness you like, but I'm afraid you'll find very few people will be agreeing with you.
Re: Carl Froch's Top Five Super-Middleweights Of All Time
Reported