I don’t think opposing PEDs out of safety is an act of ignorance. You’re making assumptions that our only position could be that PEDs will result in more death.punchoutsb wrote: ↑05 Jul 2020, 11:48
How many boxers have been killed by someone who has failed a PED test? How many fatalities has Jarrell Miller accumulated? Tyson Fury? Shane Mosely? Povetkin? Toney? Tarver? Briggs? Alvarez? Sturm? Peterson? There's a lot more names that could be added here. You already know the answer.
How many PRIDE fighters died during the run of the biggest MMA promotion in Japan that was literally run by Yakuza and where drugs we encouraged for all? I'm guessing you don't know the answer here, but it's also zero. How about the early days of UFC, pre any sort of steroid testing at all? Again, zero.
The fact is, taking PED's will not turn someone into a killing machine. People that actually believe that lack even the most basic knowledge of any of the specific pieces of the argument they so poorly try to construct.
If you are truly "civilized" and care about the future of athletes then you would be campaigning to ban boxing. Under no circumstance is boxing a safe sport. Faux-moralists only care about fighters health when it comes to PED's because they are uneducated on the effects of PED's (and we're just talking BASIC PED's here...there are combinations innumerable out there). These people don't actually care about fighters health, they just want to seem smart which is a big swing and a miss in most cases.
First, Is it really ridiculous to assume that something that makes someone bigger, faster, and stronger is dangerous? Your stats are badly skewed because it relies on only the fighters who tested positive in recent years. It is untold how many fighter deaths could be linked to PEDs now and in the past because we just don’t know. Boxing deaths do not usually occur at the high level where a well-known fighter’s positive test is highly publicized, so I don’t make much of your suggestion that PEDS≠deaths because of a few famous fighters that thankfully didn’t kill anyone. Also, you can’t point to an MMA organization as proof of anything safety-related in boxing. MMA has so many fewer deaths than boxing that the comparison is just not reliable at all.
There’s more than just deaths at stake. There’s long term health of fighters at stake. You can love boxing and care about fighter safety. The sport is what it is, but it’s not savagery.
I’m interested by the fact that VADA costs $30,000+ per fighter. That is definitely an economic limit that I admit I was ignorant of. Is there any legitimate solution to testing up and comers?H8Usernames wrote: ↑05 Jul 2020, 02:57
These things cost 36.000$ per fighter. Compare that to Dave Allens 11.000$ purse for fighting none other than Luis Ortiz Ko Machine and you have to ask yourself is boxing still a sport or has it become a medical field?