What make you think that? The Hitman's legs were a liability at welterweight.pound per pound wrote: ↑19 Jul 2020, 13:51 Duran's best stuff was at light weight. While his win over Leonard was huge that night, he's not beating Tommy Hearns at Welter Weight.
The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
But that right cross was not.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Roberto duran is a greater fighter than ray leonard. no doubt. I often hear ray being called the complete boxer. in my view Roberto is more, has more, of almost everything that ray had, except maybe flashiness and hand speed, but RD had enough speed in those stony fists to make them very tough to avoid. check out the cuevas win. duran has never been overrated.
we are lucky to have seen this man grace our sport.
we are lucky to have seen this man grace our sport.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Duran was just a wonderful human being. Clean fighter, good winner, gracious loser, never made excuses, never quit.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
You may want to check that last one Alp lol. I think that a prime Cuevas could have given Duran fits, but still a good competitive fight.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 17:05 Duran was just a wonderful human being. Clean fighter, good winner, gracious loser, never made excuses, never quit.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
I was kidding about all of them, not just the never quit. ![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Yo, man!harrygreb wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 13:48 Roberto duran is a greater fighter than ray leonard. no doubt. I often hear ray being called the complete boxer. in my view Roberto is more, has more, of almost everything that ray had, except maybe flashiness and hand speed, but RD had enough speed in those stony fists to make them very tough to avoid. check out the cuevas win. duran has never been overrated.
we are lucky to have seen this man grace our sport.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
I think so, at least at welterweight.elmersalsa wrote: ↑22 Jul 2020, 17:04It did not work against Sugar Ray? That was at welterweight. So Ray got a better chin than Duran?
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
So, what happened to Sugar Ray when Duran almost knock him out in rounds 2 to 4 in Montreal? Was not Duran with the better chin then?
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
No. He didn't put Ray down. Ray handled it like a G.elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 12:16So, what happened to Sugar Ray when Duran almost knock him out in rounds 2 to 4 in Montreal? Was not Duran with the better chin then?Nile4000 wrote: ↑22 Jul 2020, 23:02I think so, at least at welterweight.elmersalsa wrote: ↑22 Jul 2020, 17:04
It did not work against Sugar Ray? That was at welterweight. So Ray got a better chin than Duran?
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
That was the night Duran kicked Leonard's ass so bad that the NY Times and Ferdie Pacheco scored it for Sugar Ray.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Nobody ever accused Pacheco of knowing what he was talking about.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
It was a competitive fight though. Duran certainly didn't clearly win 8 rounds. It was not the beat down that elmer and others on occasion have made it out to be. There were many rounds that were hard to judge. In many rounds, Duran landed more punches, but Leonard landed more clean punches.
This fight was at least close as Hagler-Leonard.
This fight was at least close as Hagler-Leonard.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 08:05 Nobody ever accused Pacheco of knowing what he was talking about.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Two close fights with clear winners. Leonard closed the gap in Montreal closing with his two best rds but he got beat up.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 08:41 It was a competitive fight though. Duran certainly didn't clearly win 8 rounds. It was not the beat down that elmer and others on occasion have made it out to be. There were many rounds that were hard to judge. In many rounds, Duran landed more punches, but Leonard landed more clean punches.
This fight was at least close as Hagler-Leonard.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
I saw him in bad shape in those rounds.Nile4000 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2020, 15:32No. He didn't put Ray down. Ray handled it like a G.elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 12:16So, what happened to Sugar Ray when Duran almost knock him out in rounds 2 to 4 in Montreal? Was not Duran with the better chin then?![]()
.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Ferdie Pacheco and The NY Times were more biased for Sugar Ray than Howard Cossell. At least Cossell gave Duran some more credit.
I have never seen someone more biased than Pacheco.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Close fight my ass! Duran whupped him. End of story. The American media didn't want to admit the ass whupping. That fight was not close at all.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 08:41 It was a competitive fight though. Duran certainly didn't clearly win 8 rounds. It was not the beat down that elmer and others on occasion have made it out to be. There were many rounds that were hard to judge. In many rounds, Duran landed more punches, but Leonard landed more clean punches.
This fight was at least close as Hagler-Leonard.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
He was. But he took the punishment.elmersalsa wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 14:40I saw him in bad shape in those rounds.Nile4000 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2020, 15:32No. He didn't put Ray down. Ray handled it like a G.elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Jul 2020, 12:16
So, what happened to Sugar Ray when Duran almost knock him out in rounds 2 to 4 in Montreal? Was not Duran with the better chin then?![]()
.
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Put it another way, if SRL had gotten a UD in Montreal, it's not like it would even be considered for the top 100 worst decisions of alltime.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
And I will answer as I have before. you yourself only had Duran winning by three points. You have shown that math is not your thing, (among other things) but 3 points is not that much.elmersalsa wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 14:45Close fight my ass! Duran whupped him. End of story. The American media didn't want to admit the ass whupping. That fight was not close at all.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑28 Jul 2020, 08:41 It was a competitive fight though. Duran certainly didn't clearly win 8 rounds. It was not the beat down that elmer and others on occasion have made it out to be. There were many rounds that were hard to judge. In many rounds, Duran landed more punches, but Leonard landed more clean punches.
This fight was at least close as Hagler-Leonard.
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15182
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Agree. If you give Leonard a lot of the close rounds, you certainly could give him the fight. (Of course if you give them all to Duran and he wins by a more comfortable margin)
There were a lot rounds that were difficult to score; many more than in a typical fight.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39268
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: The Brawl in Montreal: 40 Years Later
Anyone here have Ray winning? Didn't read all the posts...
Or yall just arguing over scoring in a fight all the judges and all yall scored for Robby
Or yall just arguing over scoring in a fight all the judges and all yall scored for Robby