Viewing figures

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23089
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Viewing figures

Post by mickey1975 »

JimJim2009 wrote: 05 Aug 2020, 09:22
veriton wrote: 03 Aug 2020, 10:09 I'm guessing lyndon arthur (menacing ethnic street thug) against dec spelman (weirdly tattooed scaffolder) isn't really going to capture much of the public's imagination even if it was a good trade fight. what are their selling points?
Its hard cracking the scaffolding scene, definitely a niche market
Biggest small hall seller I know is a scaffolder!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Viewing figures

Post by Counter-puncher »

JimJim2009 wrote: 05 Aug 2020, 09:22
veriton wrote: 03 Aug 2020, 10:09 I'm guessing lyndon arthur (menacing ethnic street thug) against dec spelman (weirdly tattooed scaffolder) isn't really going to capture much of the public's imagination even if it was a good trade fight. what are their selling points?
Its hard cracking the scaffolding scene, definitely a niche market
:lol: :lol: :clap:
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Viewing figures

Post by PredatorHayds »

Basically the FW cards have been poor. With only 5 fights per card it was a great opportunity to put on 5 competitive scraps. He still decided to put prospects against Journeyman on the undercard.
This meant there wasn’t much quality for BT to advertise and the marketing was poor.

Sky put on a quality card and advertised it well.

FW ditched BN which was churning out quality fights (which it had to, to survive). Since his BT contract he’s been churning out mismatches like he did with SKY.
The quality has in the main part been dire.
The bad news is that I can see BT ditching boxing all together once the contract expires.
No wonder they are desperate for a Queensbury-Matchroom card. He’s reluctant to put the majority of his quality fighters in with each other unless he’s desperate for a PPV (Joyce-Dubois)

I thought the Sky show was enjoyable from start to finish.
veriton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1598
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 07:35

Re: Viewing figures

Post by veriton »

I really dont get why they put someone like Brett Fidoe on a card like that.

would anyone sit and watch raheem sterling repeatedly kicking the ball into an empty net for 12 minutes with rawling saying "he's really learning a lot from this, testing out his shot variety"

total waste of time.
ash.1601
Featherweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 02 Aug 2020, 20:18

Re: Viewing figures

Post by ash.1601 »

PredatorHayds wrote: 05 Aug 2020, 10:15 Basically the FW cards have been poor. With only 5 fights per card it was a great opportunity to put on 5 competitive scraps. He still decided to put prospects against Journeyman on the undercard.
This meant there wasn’t much quality for BT to advertise and the marketing was poor.

Sky put on a quality card and advertised it well.

FW ditched BN which was churning out quality fights (which it had to, to survive). Since his BT contract he’s been churning out mismatches like he did with SKY.
The quality has in the main part been dire.
The bad news is that I can see BT ditching boxing all together once the contract expires.
No wonder they are desperate for a Queensbury-Matchroom card. He’s reluctant to put the majority of his quality fighters in with each other unless he’s desperate for a PPV (Joyce-Dubois)

I thought the Sky show was enjoyable from start to finish.
Also did Dubois v Joyce and Warrington v Frampton in the last 18 months. I don’t think Frank is too bad for matching his own fighters. Think Hearn keeps his apart a lot more.
maninthemiddle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 334
Joined: 16 Dec 2009, 18:09

Re: Viewing figures

Post by maninthemiddle »

Very surprised Fight Camp 2 going up against City v Real Madrid...surely the PGA Golf never stopped this show being scheduled on a Saturday??
Post Reply