Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 13:00dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25
I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"![]()
![]()
![]()
This confirms my suspiciouns about Ron existing in another reality to the rest of us.
I get the ironic appeal, but imagine going back on youtube to watch a classic fight and discovering big Ron's calling it. Now you're not just watching a fight. You're also listening to Ron Oooohhhhhhhhh McIntosh proffering elucidating annotations upon the fist-laden exploits in the square ring canvassed circle of the boxing variety as these two sinewy exponents of the punches arcing explode into action............ etc etc. It's unendurable. He ruins every fight.
Bring Back Ian Darke!
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13313
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Ronald Mackintosh is only slightly bearable because he has marginally improved from the pure horror of his earlier commentary
-
Frostieballs
- Featherweight
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Ron is really well researched and I always find he adds interesting colour, but he does perhaps pitch himself at too high a level sometimes!dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!Delta Jay wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 11:24
I can see how anyone would find him annoying, his tone and the dictionary vomit and all that.
He’s boxed himself a bit (apparently) and he reads fights decently enough, but his research and knowledge is A1. Even on a tricky gig like the Worlds in Russia last year he had a good bit of background info on every fighter.
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"
Another really well educated commentator, or presenter I should say, is Ed Robinson. I was really baffled when Sky stopped giving him so much airtime. Solid bloke as well. One of the nicest in the sport.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
It’s arse-backwards. Anyone who’s good and knowledgeable like Ed gets bailed off and anyone who can scream about the grit and determination or repeat a fighter’s exaggerated backstory gets the promotion. I’ve only just realised I haven’t seen him for ages, get him back as well.Frostieballs wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 13:32Ron is really well researched and I always find he adds interesting colour, but he does perhaps pitch himself at too high a level sometimes!dookus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:44What I get out of big Ron is quoting him verbatim and then laughing hysterically.Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 12:25
I get what you mean but if that's the case he would be best employed as a researcher for someone with a more polished, able broadcasting style. Ron's whirlwind of verbiage isn't just amateurish; there's something mentally subnormal about it all. It's like he's autistic or in another reality to normal people, the way he goes on. Literally any announcer in history is preferable to him. He's not an announcer!
I will never ever ever forget him interviewing some Russian boxer after a Super Series fight, kicking off with an impenetrable minute-long mix of statements and questions, and getting the response "I don't understand. Thank you to God and my family and coach, it was good fight"
Another really well educated commentator, or presenter I should say, is Ed Robinson. I was really baffled when Sky stopped giving him so much airtime. Solid bloke as well. One of the nicest in the sport.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Ed Robinson was working behind the scenes for quite a while before doing some of the presenting work.
I think he got the push around the same time as Darke and McCrory.
He occasionally posted on here too.
I dunno is he is still working for SKY or not, but he is another face who is missed.
I think he got the push around the same time as Darke and McCrory.
He occasionally posted on here too.
I dunno is he is still working for SKY or not, but he is another face who is missed.
-
Frostieballs
- Featherweight
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
He put in the years and work required to get his break. When he got It he didn’t disappoint but for some reason wasn’t/isn’t used anywhere near as much as he should be.Coco wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 14:34 Ed Robinson was working behind the scenes for quite a while before doing some of the presenting work.
I think he got the push around the same time as Darke and McCrory.
He occasionally posted on here too.
I dunno is he is still working for SKY or not, but he is another face who is missed.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32940
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Those old shows have such an air of sophistication now. Boxing broadcasts have been dragged into the gutter.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 15:20 Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
-
Frostieballs
- Featherweight
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
I blame Neil Diamond.Onamastus wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 17:19Those old shows have such an air of sophistication now. Boxing broadcasts have been dragged into the gutter.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑22 Aug 2020, 15:20 Big Ron is probably more suited to radio, where a constant stream of information is required. I don’t mind him on tv, but he can be a bit over-zealous with his descriptions.
Darke & McCrory were excellent together, and Paul Dempsey supporting in the studio (always tuxed up, naturally) gave an additional air of gravitas to proceedings. I look back on those days very fondly.
Adam Smith, needless to say, is fvcking awful.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39338
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Its the little things that can make a difference, like for Pov-Whyte, the first round was close, could feasibly gone either way as they eased into it and not much happened, but instead Adam Smith just insists that Whyte definitely won it , too much trying to force a narrative you know bruh
A good commentator is more like a guide who can educate people and help them form their own opinions instead of just slamming some fanboi nuthugger story on them
Lol Ron's brain is special for sure, it's his gift and curse
A good commentator is more like a guide who can educate people and help them form their own opinions instead of just slamming some fanboi nuthugger story on them
Lol Ron's brain is special for sure, it's his gift and curse
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Why did the 'why does Adam Smith have a camera on himself while commentating?' thread get exterminated?
-
Frostieballs
- Featherweight
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
I think it's been moved to the RBR forum as I was able to track one of my posts downFrostieballs wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:01I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32940
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
One of my biggest bugbears, I’ve given up complaining about it now because it never changes. Absolutely no point in moving an active RBR thread to a different part of the forum where hardly anyone goes, it kills the conversation dead and it’s not like there’s loads of traffic on the board as it is. Mods should at least wait until it drops off the first page of B&I before moving it.dookus wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:19I think it's been moved to the RBR forum as I was able to track one of my posts downFrostieballs wrote: ↑25 Aug 2020, 12:01I noticed that. In fact, the whole RBR thread has gone. The one that is left is the pre fight thread.
The RBR has some pure comedy genius on it.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39338
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
Agree, shouldnt be moved till hits 2nd page
-
Frostieballs
- Featherweight
- Posts: 2027
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Bring Back Ian Darke!
I didn’t know a RBR forum even existed, but then again I am a newbie.