Terry O'Connor

jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by jonny »

Muttley wrote: 21 Oct 2020, 10:39
THEBUTCH wrote: 19 Oct 2020, 18:01 I've posted on another thread already, but anyway....my understanding is scorecards are collected at the end of each round, so if I'm correct, it can't be a scorecard.
It looks like a phone in my opinion. And yes, unless the format has changed in the last few years, scorecards are collected at the end of each round and handed to the governing body supervisor, who then adds up the scores on the main scorecard after each round. Also, there is now way a judge in any form of competition, should have a mobile device on and on show.
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by jonny »

They get 12 scorecards and hand one to the ref end of each round. The video clearly shows it is his cards
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by MarkMcBurney »

Glass Joe wrote: 21 Oct 2020, 11:12 Shouldn't be judging a fight at 67 should be a cut off age, this gives the chance for new younger officials to come in, you don't see many if at all young boxing officials, most seem to start in the mid-40s
Referees judge fights as well as referee. I once emailed the board to enquire about registering to be a referee (obviously the lowest level) as I love the sport and was never good enough to fight, and they emailed back to say they weren't accepting any applications. It really is a closed shop, which is why you see the same 7 or 8 guys refereeing and judging a show
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by JimJim2009 »

Next short square slip of paper in his hand might be his P45
brian13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1853
Joined: 07 Dec 2008, 15:01

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by brian13 »

He has just been cleared by the BBBofC
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Boxing Prospect »

The BBBofC statement makes it very, very obvious that when a British fighter gets robbed on foreign soil, the board for that fight can go "we reviewed it, he stated his opinion an that's that". Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic by Smith, the board and O'Connor. The BBBofC have just made it clear that nothing will happen to officials here, and have destroyed any argument we can have when one of ours gets shafted.

Bunch of fornicating useless pudenda
TheGoods
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1270
Joined: 28 Sep 2003, 16:10

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by TheGoods »

Entitled, arrogant, shambolic response from the Board. It really is an old boy’s club. Huge irony that a “board of control” is actually damaging the sport with their blatant failure to try and stop and snuff out these illogical, nonsense cards.

Must be infuriating for Hearn as all the graft that went into that bill, the effort of all involved (not least the boxers) will forever be overshadowed by the conclusions of an absolute cockwomble sitting ringside.

I can’t wait for his next outrageous scorecard.

Cheers Terry, kids are crying.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Smith had already set his stall out at the start of the week with his IFL interview. So there really wasn't much point to this review/enquiry.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103167
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

“Allegations made on social media and the print media as to Mr O’Connor using a mobile telephone or similar handheld device were considered,” a Board statement said.

“Following extensive consideration of footage and Mr O’Connor’s evidence supplied, the Stewards are satisfied that Mr O’Connor was not in possession of any telephone or handheld device whilst carrying out his duties as a Judge in the contest between Lewis Ritson and Miguel Vazquez and his scoring of said bout was not affected in any way.

“In addition, Mr O’Connor’s scoring of the bout was considered and whilst judging a contest is subjective and following Mr. O’Connor’s explanation of how he scored the bout, the Stewards are satisfied that Mr O’Connor’s final score reflected his own opinion of the contest.”
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27508
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by stujones »

What was it then? I think we, as fans, should put a red line through it now and not create a witch hunt or anything - but I wish the BBBoC would have been a bit more open in their statement.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3342
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Twinkle Toes »

O'Conner can't judge a fight with impartiality and it's been confirmed as okay by the board. :shame:
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4489
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by dookus »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 13:09 “In addition, Mr O’Connor’s scoring of the bout was considered and whilst judging a contest is subjective and following Mr. O’Connor’s explanation of how he scored the bout, the Stewards are satisfied that Mr O’Connor’s final score reflected his own opinion of the contest.”
No! It's not enough to be his own opinion, it's got to be objectively defensible. Their statement does nothing to clear this up.
Perkin Warbeck
Lightweight
Posts: 1971
Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Perkin Warbeck »

jameswilson wrote: 24 Nov 2019, 09:17 Of all our referees I’ve always had him right down at the bottom as the worst of the lot.
Only Ian John-Lewis is worse.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

dookus wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 15:23
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 13:09 “In addition, Mr O’Connor’s scoring of the bout was considered and whilst judging a contest is subjective and following Mr. O’Connor’s explanation of how he scored the bout, the Stewards are satisfied that Mr O’Connor’s final score reflected his own opinion of the contest.”
No! It's not enough to be his own opinion, it's got to be objectively defensible. Their statement does nothing to clear this up.
Yup, It’s a complete crock of sh1t. “reflected his own opinion of the contest” :lol:

It’s like their saying he’s not corrupt he’s just a complete fuckn moron when it comes to scoring fights and we'll move on to the next one.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39338
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ya, but 'fair play' to Robert Smith and Tel

?
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4489
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by dookus »

ShadrachSimmo wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 15:45
dookus wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 15:23
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 13:09 “In addition, Mr O’Connor’s scoring of the bout was considered and whilst judging a contest is subjective and following Mr. O’Connor’s explanation of how he scored the bout, the Stewards are satisfied that Mr O’Connor’s final score reflected his own opinion of the contest.”
No! It's not enough to be his own opinion, it's got to be objectively defensible. Their statement does nothing to clear this up.
Yup, It’s a complete crock of sh1t. “reflected his own opinion of the contest” :lol:

It’s like their saying he’s not corrupt he’s just a complete fuckn moron when it comes to scoring fights and we'll move on to the next one.
:lol: "It's stupid, but it's honest stupid." Come on. New blood please.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by skanksta »

It's kinda worse - I'd rather by corrupt than useless.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39338
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by margaret thatcher »

suggesting someone's opinion is okay because it's their opinion is so f@cking mind blowing stupid lol
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5006
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Glass Joe »

No surprise from the board to look after their inner circle let's, get rid of the officials over 65, also more schemes for younger talent to come in.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32940
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Next time my 6 year old boy gets told off in school for getting his sums wrong, I’ll get him to tell the teacher that his answers are reflective of his own opinion :yay:
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39338
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by margaret thatcher »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 17:21 Next time my 6 year old boy gets told off in school for getting his sums wrong, I’ll get him to tell the teacher that his answers are reflective of his own opinion :yay:
:yay:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23198
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by handsofstone »

BBBC have opened up an investigation of Marcus McDonnell's 116-113 Vazquez card
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Deserter »

TheGoods wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 13:06 Entitled, arrogant, shambolic response from the Board. It really is an old boy’s club. Huge irony that a “board of control” is actually damaging the sport with their blatant failure to try and stop and snuff out these illogical, nonsense cards.
Perfectly put mate. Honestly just makes me think fornicate this sport, as there's not even a pretence of professionalism or objectivity. Interested to see how Matt Christie and crew handle it in next week's BN.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3372
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

I wouldn’t be surprised if all the furore around this matter led to Tel voluntarily resigning in the next couple of months. Maybe Smith and the board didn’t want to be seen to be bullied into action by social media outrage even though it was justified on this occasion.

You have to think that they know what’s right and they know it’s time for Tel to go.

Is Eddie Hearn totally blameless in all this ....
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Terry O'Connor

Post by Fray Bentos »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 23 Oct 2020, 19:24

Is Eddie Hearn totally blameless in all this ....
The crux of the problem are the promoters paying the officials off. Of course, they won't sanction them because they can cause trouble and put the BBB of C out of business.

The day I realised the level of corruption in British boxing was the day I lost interest in it. The 'sport' is rotten to its core. O'Connor is just the most obvious tumor but it goes far deeper than him.
Post Reply