Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
That is the way you measure greatness. Greatness comes in degrees.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51
Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
You couldn't measure greatness with a ruler. Your methods are to change the degree and reasoning to suit your argument.elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:23That is the way you measure greatness. Greatness comes in degrees.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
You screamed for pages about the great Perez's gold medal being a reason to counter his weak opposition.
Anyway, I'm bored with you.
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!elmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:11No, he is not better than Pascual Perez. No way!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 01:51
Who cares? He might be, if not is #110 useless? Damn Elmer, you gotta grow up at some point and recognize fighters you don't like. He's definitely greater than Pascal Perez.
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.gilgamesh wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:32Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there![]()
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.gilgamesh wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:32Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 14:36
Oscar has an Olympic gold medal and beat fighters you've heard of!!!!!!
Isn't it funny the twists and turns these conversations take?
Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya, and somehow Pascual Perez got thrown in there![]()
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020, 18:40
He always rambles on about Perez. Anyone from South or central America Elmo loves. In particularly the great Panama. We actually like and hate a lot of the same fighters and rarely agree. That's how much dick he sucks.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
You're a moron.elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.elmersalsa wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 12:55
Because the great Pascual Perez did not beat an American fighter in his title reign it does not mean that he beat scrubs. Your knowledge about fighters from South American soil is limited. Pascual beat some good opposition to be called great. And in the era that he fought, the 1950s, it had to be tough for any fighter that wanted to be world champion. Why? Because you really had to really fight the very best. Pascual beat the best flyweights of his era. And he did it over 90 fights. That is a lot of fights! Especially, for someone that started his professional career late.
I will break down to all of you, why Pascual was great and his opponents. It is about weight classsifications not wins against fighters that you could not fight.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Just like you, right? Assholes like you never change.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:12You're a moron.elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020, 14:18
The great Pascal Perez had an Olympic gold medal! You like to count title defenses for him too. Your breakdown will just show how overrated his resume is. You've done it before, some of your worst stuff and that's saying something.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
No, I'm highly intelligent. Nobody has ever mistaken you for having a brain. As for changing you're more stubborn than a 5 year old. All in all, you're a vile creature.elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 08:35Just like you, right? Assholes like you never change.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:12You're a moron.elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Oct 2020, 17:07
His resume is not overrated. Pascual Perez was a great fighter by all means. There is no love for the flyweights.
-
prewarboxing
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 641
- Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 02:58
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
This whole thread is pathetic.
I sometimes wonder why I bother with this forum
Miles Templeton
I sometimes wonder why I bother with this forum
Miles Templeton
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Highly intelligent, my ass!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 09:58No, I'm highly intelligent. Nobody has ever mistaken you for having a brain. As for changing you're more stubborn than a 5 year old. All in all, you're a vile creature.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15708
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Yeah, because of assholes like Onetimeonly that dare to disrespect people or other one's opinions.prewarboxing wrote: ↑24 Oct 2020, 12:32 This whole thread is pathetic.
I sometimes wonder why I bother with this forum
Miles Templeton
And he calls himself highly intelligent. Intelligent my ass! He's a fool according to his folly.
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Emile Griffith or Oscar De La Hoya
Yes, all my fault. 