WBC Creates A New Weight Division

gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46324
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by gilgamesh »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:18
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:07What weight is the new class? 220?
I previously performed a deep analysis of the potential new weight class based on Tony Bellew’s recommendations about it having a 220lbs limit, since he was working the WBC on this matter.

So I simply recited the stats I’d already gathered. And it's clear that 4lbs doesn’t significantly affect the obvious interpretation of the numbers.
Nah. It just pisses on the legacy of the Heavyweight Championship.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Enlightened-One »

gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:19Nah. It just pisses on the legacy of the Heavyweight Championship.
I don’t think it’ll affect the heavyweight division in any way.

The vast majority of today’s heavyweights will make no effort to lose 20lbs+ or so.

And it’s not as if the new weight class has a similar name that could easily confuse fans.

I think you're blowing the issue out of proportion.

If fans agree that the new weight class is a bad idea, then won't pay attention to it. They'll refuse to watch the fights.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5711
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Given water weight dropping a better metric than using 220 for some reason would be 235 since those fighters could easily compete at 225 drying out the night before.

2010 to present


Then you get
Chagaev 2 regular defenses
Wilder 10 title defenses
Haye over harrison and ruiz
Povetkin 4 regular defenses


The 3 best fighter since 2010 were bigger: wlad, vitali, fury. But wlad lost to Brewster and vitali lost to byrd. Fury was put on his butt by Cunningham



4 of the current top 10 hw are under 230
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5711
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

And that is the difference between actual critical thinking and reciting a number
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24654
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Tony1244 »

What a f*cking idiot. :brick:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46324
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by gilgamesh »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:22
gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:19Nah. It just pisses on the legacy of the Heavyweight Championship.
I don’t think it’ll affect the heavyweight division in any way.

The vast majority of today’s heavyweights will make no effort to lose 20lbs+ or so.

And it’s not as if the new weight class has a similar name that could easily confuse fans.

I think you're blowing the issue out of proportion.

If fans agree that the new weight class is a bad idea, then won't pay attention to it. They'll refuse to watch the fights.
You think I'm blowing the issue out of proportion because thinking ain't one of your strengths.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Enlightened-One »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:27 Given water weight dropping a better metric than using 220 for some reason would be 235 since those fighters could easily compete at 225 drying out the night before.

2010 to present


Then you get
Chagaev 2 regular defenses
Wilder 10 title defenses
Haye over harrison and ruiz
Povetkin 4 regular defenses


The 3 best fighter since 2010 were bigger: wlad, vitali, fury. But wlad lost to Brewster and vitali lost to byrd. Fury was put on his butt by Cunningham



4 of the current top 10 hw are under 230
Within the last two decades, 158 world heavyweight title fights have been fought (according to BoxRec). And your list only represents a small percentage of the overall figures.

The novice iteration of Fury was the only fighter to ever stop Cunningham.

Vitali was ahead on the scorecards prior to his loss through injury to Byrd.

Wladimir avenged his loss to Brewster, which had occurred before Klitschko's prime.

Even if there are four heavyweights that could theoretically dehydrate to make the official 224lbs limit for the new weight class, none of them will bother to do so if it results in a big reduction in their purses.

Citing a few exceptions doesn't mean you've successfully undermined the general rule.

And that is the difference between actual critical thinking and reciting a number! :TU:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Onetimeonly »

:lol:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Enlightened-One »

gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:56You think I'm blowing the issue out of proportion because thinking ain't one of your strengths.
I understand this is a sensitive subject matter you deeply care about, but don’t you think you’re overreacting?

The only thing I'm guilty of is citing statistical facts.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by oogiebe »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:14
gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:56You think I'm blowing the issue out of proportion because thinking ain't one of your strengths.
I understand this is a sensitive subject matter you deeply care about, but don’t you think you’re overreacting?

The only thing I'm guilty of is citing statistical facts.
Why don't you go watch some fights and stop your silly rants. :OhYes:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Onetimeonly »

gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:56
Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:22
gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:19Nah. It just pisses on the legacy of the Heavyweight Championship.
I don’t think it’ll affect the heavyweight division in any way.

The vast majority of today’s heavyweights will make no effort to lose 20lbs+ or so.

And it’s not as if the new weight class has a similar name that could easily confuse fans.

I think you're blowing the issue out of proportion.

If fans agree that the new weight class is a bad idea, then won't pay attention to it. They'll refuse to watch the fights.
You think I'm blowing the issue out of proportion because thinking ain't one of your strengths.
You're talking about a clown who just said wlad wasn't prime when he lost to brewster but made no mention of lamons state for the "avenged" rematch. Astonishing that anyone talks to him at all other than to wind up the puppet.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46324
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by gilgamesh »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:14
gilgamesh wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:56You think I'm blowing the issue out of proportion because thinking ain't one of your strengths.
I understand this is a sensitive subject matter you deeply care about, but don’t you think you’re overreacting?

The only thing I'm guilty of is citing statistical facts.
I know I'm not overreacting. I actually respect this sport, and it's Legends.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Counter-puncher »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 11:18 So I simply recited the same stats
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Counter-puncher »

[quote=Enlightened-One post_id=5456606 time=1605111046 user_id=148937

And that is the difference between actual critical thinking and reciting a number! :TU:
[/quote]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

EO referencing critical thinking, as opposed to the mere reciting of numbers :lol:

well done, oh irony-free zone
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Counter-puncher »

Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:14

The only thing I'm capable of is citing statistical facts.
:oo
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Onetimeonly »

Counter-puncher wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:34
Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:14

The only thing I'm capable of is citing statistical facts.
:oo
Like canelo only fighting once in 2019. I'll never forget watching her pretend that was accurate.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Counter-puncher »

Onetimeonly wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:51
Counter-puncher wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:34
Enlightened-One wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:14

The only thing I'm capable of is citing statistical facts.
:oo
Like canelo only fighting once in 2019. I'll never forget watching her pretend that was accurate.
bro it's difficult, we should be more sympathetic really

oestrogen is well-known to cause memory loss and cognitive problems

in basic terms EO has been menopausal his entire time on this forum. really we should credit him for being interested in boxing at all, with those gross man-breasts, the constant sweats, the memory loss.....
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Onetimeonly »

Counter-puncher wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:58
Onetimeonly wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:51
Counter-puncher wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 12:34

:oo
Like canelo only fighting once in 2019. I'll never forget watching her pretend that was accurate.
bro it's difficult, we should be more sympathetic really

oestrogen is well-known to cause memory loss and cognitive problems

in basic terms EO has been menopausal his entire time on this forum. really we should credit him for being interested in boxing at all, with those gross man-breasts, the constant sweats, the memory loss.....
:lol:

Not to mention the endless, futile, search for penis. A menopausal virgin.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5711
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

I knew that comment would trigger him. It is true and everyone here knows it including him
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Counter-puncher »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 13:08 I knew that comment would trigger him. It is true and everyone here knows it including him


bro, everything triggers EO
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32705
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Boxerbeetle »

oogiebe wrote: 10 Nov 2020, 18:36
ldlamb wrote: 10 Nov 2020, 18:33 Some things are so ridiculously dumb that you can’t believe a sentient human came up with it.
A sentient human didn't. Sulaiman and Bellow did.
:lol:
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24654
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Tony1244 »

Can't really enjoy boxing or politics anymore because everything is corrupt and lead by a confederacy of dunces. :verysad:
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Thomastearns »

Tony1244 wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 15:10 Can't really enjoy boxing or politics anymore because everything is corrupt and lead by a confederacy of dunces. :verysad:

The market rules, eh?

Everything slowly becoming a business, determined by contract. Not to mention corruption, fraud, chicanery and behind the scenes horse trading, 24/7 propaganda aimed at the confused masses.

All praying to the only religion that counts, Mammon.

Boxing, like virtually every other major sport is merely a way of moving money around. Any genuine sporting element has gradually been eviscerated. I could be wrong, but the turning point might have been the Olympic Games of 1984 in Los Angeles.

Boxing today is a business like any other. Various parties invest large sums hoping to reap larger returns. Fair enough, if the sporting element remained untouched. Alas, it doesn't.

Perhaps in boxing the seeds were shown even earlier. The unnecessary forming of the WBC back in 63 led to a schism that under the father son leadership of Jose and Mauricio has bought the sport to ever greater shame.
The WBO, IBF, IBO, and IBA etc etc are all also doing their best to make things worse.

In the end the consumer has a choice, either walk away or do as they are done unto. With that in mind, I intend to keep my hands on my money and watch my future boxing on YouTube etc.

Right now it will take something very special to make me part with another penny for this racket.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24654
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Tony1244 »

Thomastearns wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 15:31
Tony1244 wrote: 11 Nov 2020, 15:10 Can't really enjoy boxing or politics anymore because everything is corrupt and lead by a confederacy of dunces. :verysad:

The market rules, eh?

Everything slowly becoming a business, determined by contract. Not to mention corruption, fraud, chicanery and behind the scenes horse trading, 24/7 propaganda aimed at the confused masses.

All praying to the only religion that counts, Mammon.

Boxing, like virtually every other major sport is merely a way of moving money around. Any genuine sporting element has gradually been eviscerated. I could be wrong, but the turning point might have been the Olympic Games of 1984 in Los Angeles.

Boxing today is a business like any other. Various parties invest large sums hoping to reap larger returns. Fair enough, if the sporting element remained untouched. Alas, it doesn't.

Perhaps in boxing the seeds were shown even earlier. The unnecessary forming of the WBC back in 63 led to a schism that under the father son leadership of Jose and Mauricio has bought the sport to ever greater shame.
The WBO, IBF, IBO, and IBA etc etc are all also doing their best to make things worse.

In the end the consumer has a choice, either walk away or do as they are done unto. With that in mind, I intend to keep my hands on my money and watch my future boxing on YouTube etc.

Right now it will take something very special to make me part with another penny for this racket.
Spot on :TU:

The 1984 Olympics and the early 1970s baseball strikes are good examples. I'm sure there are others.

We understand people are there to make money, but the greed is through the roof. The irony is boxing would make more money if they respected the fans. This move is a slap in the face to any real fan. Anyone not offended by this simply doesn't know what's going on.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: WBC Creates A New Weight Division

Post by Onetimeonly »

Yup, they're way overpaid. Not the boxers fault, but that's what killed the sport in the States. Who wants a 50/50 fight for the same money as 2 layups?
Post Reply