Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

For RBR threads only
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100694
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Good to see Arum.

Doesn’t look too good.
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by lazboy »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 01:17
lazboy wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 01:11 Who wins Brook v Khan?
It’s Khan too fast??
What I'm thinking too. I favoured Brook for a long time though. Very hard to call because Khan has lost his heart and also can't take punishment.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100694
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Brook was countering well and Jabbing. Once TC switched, he took that jab away.
ldlamb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 759
Joined: 30 Jun 2007, 23:51

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by ldlamb »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 01:18 Good to see Arum.

Doesn’t look too good.
I hope to look that good at 89
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13971
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Evander »

Kell should have throw punched Crawford or punched him in the cooter.
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13971
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Evander »

Crawford was good for the win.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Enlightened-One »

I haven’t watched the fight, because I refuse to paying to watch mismatches, but it would be great if someone could let me know how accurate my prediction was...
Enlightened-One wrote: 14 Oct 2020, 08:04The best we can optimistically hope for is for is Crawford being cagey and cautious at the start, creating the illusion during the first few rounds of Brook being competitive. In contrast, the reality is that the American is simply a slow starter.

But from the fourth round onwards, I expect Crawford to gain the winning momentum and beat up the Brit. Forcing a stoppage during the middle rounds...
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39201
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by margaret thatcher »

100 percent of the fight prediction players nailed this one, crawdaddy just obviously was too good
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3474
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Cent0089 »

Impressive. Bring on Porter and Spence/Garcia winner. No more games :box: :box: :box:
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3474
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Cent0089 »

BTW besides his complete boxing skillset, i am very impressed by Crawford physicality, strength and toughness, compared with bigger and more muscular fighters at 147.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Enlightened-One »

A question for you guys...

ESPN, Top Rank’s home network, rates Crawford as being the best pound-for-pound fighter on the planet, despite his thin resume and his own admission of Kell Brook being his biggest test.

Do you think it’s reasonable to rate him so highly, considering his most recent notable victory happened almost 3½ years ago?

And if so, at what point are we supposed to lose patience?

Personally-speaking, if he doesn’t face a top-five rated welterweight during 2021, then I’ll consider him a hype job that doesn’t deserve to be considered a top-ten pound-for-pounder.

My words might seem harsh, but he’s the only person that should be blamed for choosing the pay cheque over sporting legacy and credibility.

And I won’t applaud him or rate him based on what might have been, had he chosen a different career path.

It annoys the hell out of me to think that the media seems impressed by Crawford winning a fight most of us predicted as being blatantly horrendous mismatch.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by DrDuke »

Crawford is the sweet science master, the second coming of Sugar Ray Leonard, the true welterweight king, the true p4p leader.

Crawford gave away the first couple of rounds in the orthodox stance, he often does so to adapt, to calculate opponents, to try something new and his tactics is justified, because after that an opponent is Crawford's. It was the same here. Brook was sentenced since the 3rd round.

The hook, that was crucial, was perfect, so fast, short and sharp. Absolutely beautiful to watch. Perfectly executed. So short, as if it was a jab. Yet powerful.

This was the most convincing win over Brook up to the date.

Crawford is a masterful beast in his prime. Grandpa Bob should understand this and bring the best opposition for Crawford, while Crawford maintains his peak.
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 643
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by sharpei_louis »

I agree with the sentiment of the above even if I don't think Crawford has had the opposition yet to start SRL comparisons.

I've always been a Brook fan, at least in terms of style, but was concerned that the weight yo-yoing and lifestyle between fights would catch up with him - I don't think that was a factor in this fight at all. I think he looked as good as he has done physically, and was boxing as well as he could have with sharp jab and counters in the first couple of rounds - I know he does that in fights and then fades but he looked fit and sharp. At the conclusion Crawford was just too cute and I think Brook's appetite for battle since Golovkin has affected his response to heavy fire meaning he just covers up against a good finisher.
I'd still like to see Crawford-Spence and maybe how he deals with Pacman before proclaiming him as the next SRL/Mayweather etc.
The Gratest
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6495
Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by The Gratest »

lazboy wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 01:11 Who wins Brook v Khan?
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3474
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Cent0089 »

His resume is pretty solid to me, but he still missing that career defining fights. I still think he has at least 3-4 years of prime, he must dealt with Spence, Garcia, Porter and others if he wanna spot in history next to Mayweather or Leonard
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Onetimeonly »

Enlightened-One wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 04:08 I haven’t watched the fight, because I refuse to paying to watch mismatches, but it would be great if someone could let me know how accurate my prediction was...
Enlightened-One wrote: 14 Oct 2020, 08:04The best we can optimistically hope for is for is Crawford being cagey and cautious at the start, creating the illusion during the first few rounds of Brook being competitive. In contrast, the reality is that the American is simply a slow starter.

But from the fourth round onwards, I expect Crawford to gain the winning momentum and beat up the Brit. Forcing a stoppage during the middle rounds...
You nailed an 11-1 favorite. Very impressive. :lol:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Counter-puncher »

Onetimeonly wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 06:40
Enlightened-One wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 04:08 I haven’t watched the fight, because I refuse to paying to watch mismatches, but it would be great if someone could let me know how accurate my prediction was...
Enlightened-One wrote: 14 Oct 2020, 08:04The best we can optimistically hope for is for is Crawford being cagey and cautious at the start, creating the illusion during the first few rounds of Brook being competitive. In contrast, the reality is that the American is simply a slow starter.

But from the fourth round onwards, I expect Crawford to gain the winning momentum and beat up the Brit. Forcing a stoppage during the middle rounds...
You nailed an 11-1 favorite. Very impressive. :lol:
‘I haven’t managed to see the fight yet and due to tragically having one more vertebrae than I would like, I haven’t yet managed to suck my own cock over the result, could someone else suck it for me please?’
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100694
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Official Compubox Stats

Image

Official Scorecards

Image
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100694
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I know we should discard judges scores, especially when it’s only scored for 3 rounds, but what’s with Patricia?

Did she get the boxers mixed up?
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by AntonioMartin »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 15 Nov 2020, 07:46 I know we should discard judges scores, especially when it’s only scored for 3 rounds, but what’s with Patricia?

Did she get the boxers mixed up?
TBH I scored it exactly as she did.
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: Round-by-Round: Terence Crawford vs. Kell Brook - November 14, 2020

Post by AntonioMartin »

I think this spells the end of the game for Brooks as far as huge fights go.
Post Reply