I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Same thing though i dont feel bad for Crawford he knew he was going to get garbage opponents when he reupped with TR
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
You’re in denial.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:01 Its fine spence is choosing easier money over bigger money and legacy. It doesnt hurt my feelings more power to him
Bud chose the pay cheque and mismatches over legacy bouts.
Compare Spence Jr’s resume at 147lbs to Crawford’s, as well as the calibre of future opponents.
It’s seems that you’re trying to win an internet forum debate rather than discuss the real-world.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Crawford is facing garbage opponents but Spence Jr isn’t.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:07 Same thing though i dont feel bad for Crawford he knew he was going to get garbage opponents when he reupped with TR
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
I agree man
Fact remains biggest fight for spence is Crawford..... money and legacy wise
Fact remains biggest fight for spence is Crawford..... money and legacy wise
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Spence Jr’s next three bouts are against Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter and Keith Thurman. Errol’s schedule is fully-booked until 2022.
In the meantime, Crawford will continue facing past-their-prime veterans, anonymous journeymen or even worse, undersized 140lb-ers that are only making the jump to welterweight, because they’re desperately chasing the dollar.
In the meantime, Crawford will continue facing past-their-prime veterans, anonymous journeymen or even worse, undersized 140lb-ers that are only making the jump to welterweight, because they’re desperately chasing the dollar.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
So?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:12 Spence Jr’s next three bouts are against Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter and Keith Thurman. Errol’s schedule is fully-booked until 2022.
In the meantime, Crawford will continue facing past-their-prime veterans, anonymous journeymen or even worse, undersized 140lb-ers that are only making the jump to welterweight, because they’re desperately chasing the dollar.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
If you agree, then why bother asking me a question?oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:13So?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:12 Spence Jr’s next three bouts are against Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter and Keith Thurman. Errol’s schedule is fully-booked until 2022.
In the meantime, Crawford will continue facing past-their-prime veterans, anonymous journeymen or even worse, undersized 140lb-ers that are only making the jump to welterweight, because they’re desperately chasing the dollar.
I’ve already made my thoughts clear on the matter.
Nothing more needs to be said.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
I neither agree nor disagree. I just don't care. It's prizefighting. What's your next Don Quixote topic?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:15If you agree, then why bother asking me a question?oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:13So?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:12 Spence Jr’s next three bouts are against Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter and Keith Thurman. Errol’s schedule is fully-booked until 2022.
In the meantime, Crawford will continue facing past-their-prime veterans, anonymous journeymen or even worse, undersized 140lb-ers that are only making the jump to welterweight, because they’re desperately chasing the dollar.
I’ve already made my thoughts clear on the matter.
Nothing more needs to be said.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Crawford has freakishly long arms
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
He is? 5'8" is hardly 'massive' for a welterweight. In fact his last five opponents were bigger than him.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Hes not super tall in fact josh Taylor is taller
Hes got very long arms though and his frame is the type that can put on a lot of muscle
Hes got very long arms though and his frame is the type that can put on a lot of muscle
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
He isn't massive. He's 33 and is not going to be putting any significant muscle anytime soon.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:31 Hes not super tall in fact josh Taylor is taller
Hes got very long arms though and his frame is the type that can put on a lot of muscle
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Well tell that to juan Manuel Manuel Marquez! Sometimes fighters go through puberty late in life
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Terence Crawford is a huge welterweight and has traditionally been considered a “weight bully”.
Terence Crawford posted a picture of himself weighing 177lbs (before he made the jump to 147lbs) and we've also seen him rehydrate to an enormous 157lbs to dominate significantly smaller opposition in the 140lbs weight class (i.e. the Viktor Postol fight).
This is the same “official” weight that Marvin Hagler defended his middleweight crown against Roberto Duran and Mustafa Hamsho, when weigh-in’s took place on the morning of the fight.
Terence Crawford’s rehydration fighting weight at 140lbs was the equivalent of Keith Thurman, Timothy Bradley, Adrien Broner, Robert Guerrero and Danny Garcia’s rehydrated ring weight at welterweight.
Terence Crawford is a physically much bigger man today than his 140lbs heyday.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Different builds and different styles. Also Marquez was only an inch shorter than Bud and started 13 lbs less than bud did and never fought over 140 until his last three fights.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:34 Well tell that to juan Manuel Manuel Marquez! Sometimes fighters go through puberty late in life
Last edited by oogiebe on 15 Nov 2020, 22:41, edited 1 time in total.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Check his historical rehydration weights.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:28He is? 5'8" is hardly 'massive' for a welterweight. In fact his last five opponents were bigger than him.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:40Check his historical rehydration weights.
Sure right away. I'll be sure to check his opponents rehydration weights as well. In fact I'm going back to Duran and see his too.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
So you’re basically claiming that rehydration ring weights are utterly irrelevant and cannot possibly be used as a barometer to measure “size”?oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:41![]()
Sure right away. I'll be sure to check his opponents rehydration weights as well. In fact I'm going back to Duran and see his too.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9154
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
spence is the fight, but has been for 3 years, eventualy gotta start exploring other options..
i think He should of fought Patrick Teixeira for the 154 WBO title (would of been mandatory if he moved up) and its a soft 154 belt... Its not the fight i wanna see, but then he can try be undisputed 154 vs charlo... Same PBC nightmare, but im sure charlo would want that crack at undisputed.. At least then you can be calling out spence unification and charlo undisputed at once, both great fights.
i think He should of fought Patrick Teixeira for the 154 WBO title (would of been mandatory if he moved up) and its a soft 154 belt... Its not the fight i wanna see, but then he can try be undisputed 154 vs charlo... Same PBC nightmare, but im sure charlo would want that crack at undisputed.. At least then you can be calling out spence unification and charlo undisputed at once, both great fights.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Patrick Teixeira has to perform a mandatory defence against the PBC’s Brian Castaño.gregregegg wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:46 i think He should of fought Patrick Teixeira for the 154 WBO title (would of been mandatory if he moved up) and its a soft 154 belt...
The champion is the underdog for that fight.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Never said that. I"m saying that I don't care. If Craw fights any bums or midgets, I can choose not to watch.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:44So you’re basically claiming that rehydration ring weights are utterly irrelevant and cannot possibly be used as a barometer to measure “size”?
I am also saying that he is not a massive WW.
If you care to use rehydration weight to measure size comps, please provide the opponents' rehydration weights too. Thanks!
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
You only focussed on height and by your own admission, you never even bothered to check his rehydrated ring weighs,, yet you still falsely claimed his last five opponents were “bigger” than him.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:54Never said that. I"m saying that I don't care. If Craw fights any bums or midgets, I can choose not to watch.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:44So you’re basically claiming that rehydration ring weights are utterly irrelevant and cannot possibly be used as a barometer to measure “size”?
I am also saying that he is not a massive WW.
To make such an assertion without even considering rehydrated ring weights, clearly proves your belief that it’s irrelevant and cannot be used to measure “size”.
I’ve already listed examples of Crawford’s weights and compared them to other fighters.
Thanks.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
You haven't listed anyone else's rehydration weights either. So you feel it's appropriate and telling to compare weigh-in weight of one fighter against rehydration weight for the other? That's consistent for you. You are the DJT of tthe forum.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 23:07You only focussed on height and by your own admission, you never even bothered to check his rehydrated ring weighs,, yet you still falsely claimed his last five opponents were “bigger” than him.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:54Never said that. I"m saying that I don't care. If Craw fights any bums or midgets, I can choose not to watch.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Nov 2020, 22:44
So you’re basically claiming that rehydration ring weights are utterly irrelevant and cannot possibly be used as a barometer to measure “size”?
I am also saying that he is not a massive WW.
To make such an assertion without even considering rehydrated ring weights, clearly proves your belief that it’s irrelevant and cannot be used to measure “size”.
I’ve already listed examples of Crawford’s weights and compared them to other fighters.
Thanks.
Re: I want to see Crawford be in a top fight! But against who?
Here are some meaningless 'unofficial' rehydration weights from Bud's past:
2014:
November:
Terence Crawford VS Raymundo Beltran - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 153
Beltran: 147
June:
Terence Crawford VS Yuriorkis Gamboa - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 152
Gamboa: 145
2013:
October:
Terence Crawford VS Andrey Klimov - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 149
Klimov: 140
March:
Terence Crawford VS Breidis Prescott - Contested at Light Welterweight
Crawford: 150
Prescott: 157
Sure seemed to have the size over the lightweights. No surprise there.
2014:
November:
Terence Crawford VS Raymundo Beltran - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 153
Beltran: 147
June:
Terence Crawford VS Yuriorkis Gamboa - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 152
Gamboa: 145
2013:
October:
Terence Crawford VS Andrey Klimov - Contested at Lightweight
Crawford: 149
Klimov: 140
March:
Terence Crawford VS Breidis Prescott - Contested at Light Welterweight
Crawford: 150
Prescott: 157
Sure seemed to have the size over the lightweights. No surprise there.