non-bad prospect losses
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39337
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
non-bad prospect losses
anyone got examples of a hyped prospect getting that first L that didn't have lots of ppl saying that was it for them?
like, one generally considered a ''good' or respectable loss?
like, one generally considered a ''good' or respectable loss?
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: non-bad prospect losses
David Haye for me
-
Fray Bentos
- Lightweight
- Posts: 16813
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: non-bad prospect losses
This was a good forum for decent boxing conversation once.
The B and I forum on Boxrec used to be known as 'The College of Knowledge' on Doghouse B and I - we bottled a quiz against Boxrec that was going to be arranged by Frank Maloney because they would have trounced us
I doubt the Boxrec B and I forum would beat Mumsnet these days.
The return of Spud might save it, lets hope so.
The B and I forum on Boxrec used to be known as 'The College of Knowledge' on Doghouse B and I - we bottled a quiz against Boxrec that was going to be arranged by Frank Maloney because they would have trounced us
I doubt the Boxrec B and I forum would beat Mumsnet these days.
The return of Spud might save it, lets hope so.
Re: non-bad prospect losses
DDD can't swim in the deep water
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13416
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: non-bad prospect losses
If you look at his record Lee Selbys earlyish defeat seemed to have no barring on how fast his career moved.
It seems if you take an L to a decent journeyman before you get to title level but that’s it, it’s not as damaging as losing at title level as an undefeated hyped guy on tv.
It seems if you take an L to a decent journeyman before you get to title level but that’s it, it’s not as damaging as losing at title level as an undefeated hyped guy on tv.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: non-bad prospect losses
I’d say Jamie Moore against Scott Dixon. Learnt more from that fight than any other fight combined and still had his moments.
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Barry Mcguigan
Re: non-bad prospect losses
I think people seemed quite forgiving of Anthony Yarde against Kovalev. He emptied the tank and almost got Kovalev out of there... until he didn’t.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: non-bad prospect losses
I know he's not yet done much but Hinata Maruta vs Hidenori Oake was generally considered a "good loss"
Lomachenko vs Salido mate? - if you count a 1-0 Lomachenko as a prospect
Three recent British ones
John Ryder vs Billy Joe Saunders
James DeGale vs George Groves
Whyte vs Joshua
Even Price vs Thomson I maybe?
Estrada vs Roman Gonzalez (I guess Estrada was a contender tbf)
Lomachenko vs Salido mate? - if you count a 1-0 Lomachenko as a prospect
Three recent British ones
John Ryder vs Billy Joe Saunders
James DeGale vs George Groves
Whyte vs Joshua
Even Price vs Thomson I maybe?
Estrada vs Roman Gonzalez (I guess Estrada was a contender tbf)
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Matt Macklin Vs Jamie Moore
I mean it was obviously a physically damaging fight for Macklin (so a bad loss in that sense), but I don't think people were saying he got exposed.
I mean it was obviously a physically damaging fight for Macklin (so a bad loss in that sense), but I don't think people were saying he got exposed.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Not sure I’d go with Price vs Thompson. Price lost a hell of a lot confidence after that fight and was never the same again afterwards.Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 15:10 I know he's not yet done much but Hinata Maruta vs Hidenori Oake was generally considered a "good loss"
Lomachenko vs Salido mate? - if you count a 1-0 Lomachenko as a prospect
Three recent British ones
John Ryder vs Billy Joe Saunders
James DeGale vs George Groves
Whyte vs Joshua
Even Price vs Thomson I maybe?
Estrada vs Roman Gonzalez (I guess Estrada was a contender tbf)
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Dare I say Khan.
Going back a few years Cornelius Carr, Glenn Catley, Neville Brown, Chris Pyatt all suffered losses in mid prospect status.
Going back a few years Cornelius Carr, Glenn Catley, Neville Brown, Chris Pyatt all suffered losses in mid prospect status.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: non-bad prospect losses
IMO the first loss didn't have people writing him off after the result, we later learned the damage it did and the rematch completely derailed him. Most still fancied him in the rematch iirc and thought the first was a fluke, rather than exposing...maverick23 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 16:25Not sure I’d go with Price vs Thompson. Price lost a hell of a lot confidence after that fight and was never the same again afterwards.Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 15:10 I know he's not yet done much but Hinata Maruta vs Hidenori Oake was generally considered a "good loss"
Lomachenko vs Salido mate? - if you count a 1-0 Lomachenko as a prospect
Three recent British ones
John Ryder vs Billy Joe Saunders
James DeGale vs George Groves
Whyte vs Joshua
Even Price vs Thomson I maybe?
Estrada vs Roman Gonzalez (I guess Estrada was a contender tbf)
Though I'll admit my memory does suck
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32940
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Price against Thompson was a weird one, just because the shot that stopped him was so crap, I can see why people may have thought it was just a complete fluke that it totally discombobulated him.
Of course, with hindsight we know that Price is just incredibly chinny, and that should really have been obvious given the evidence from the amateurs.
Of course, with hindsight we know that Price is just incredibly chinny, and that should really have been obvious given the evidence from the amateurs.
-
Floyd the snake
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 04 Oct 2014, 13:52
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Ricky Burns losing to Alex Arthur was a great learning defeat for him .
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23088
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: non-bad prospect losses
And Carl.Floyd the snake wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:12 Ricky Burns losing to Alex Arthur was a great learning defeat for him .
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Yep - it’s amazing how he came back after being so comprehensively beat by Carl. Always thought he was a very underrated fighter.mickey1975 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:51And Carl.Floyd the snake wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:12 Ricky Burns losing to Alex Arthur was a great learning defeat for him .
Re: non-bad prospect losses
What about Hagler's losses before he got the belt. Can't recall what was said about them, but of course he eventually avenged them all.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Michael Watson losing his 8th fight to James Cook, a good learning loss. No one would have predicted Cooks late career titles run at that time he was 9-5
-
Fightnight Scores
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: 09 Feb 2019, 04:59
Re: non-bad prospect losses
mickey1975 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:51And Carl.Floyd the snake wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:12 Ricky Burns losing to Alex Arthur was a great learning defeat for him .
First one that came to mind was Burns and his 2 early losses. Most would have written him off there as just a half decent British level fighter, but he went on some journey after that!Floyd the snake wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 17:12 Ricky Burns losing to Alex Arthur was a great learning defeat for him .
-
danconnollyeire
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 3576
- Joined: 24 May 2012, 10:31
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Alright grandadFray Bentos wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 06:41 This was a good forum for decent boxing conversation once.
The B and I forum on Boxrec used to be known as 'The College of Knowledge' on Doghouse B and I - we bottled a quiz against Boxrec that was going to be arranged by Frank Maloney because they would have trounced us![]()
I doubt the Boxrec B and I forum would beat Mumsnet these days.![]()
The return of Spud might save it, lets hope so.
-
Fray Bentos
- Lightweight
- Posts: 16813
- Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12
Re: non-bad prospect losses
danconnollyeire wrote: ↑30 Nov 2020, 07:05Alright grandadFray Bentos wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 06:41 This was a good forum for decent boxing conversation once.
The B and I forum on Boxrec used to be known as 'The College of Knowledge' on Doghouse B and I - we bottled a quiz against Boxrec that was going to be arranged by Frank Maloney because they would have trounced us![]()
I doubt the Boxrec B and I forum would beat Mumsnet these days.![]()
The return of Spud might save it, lets hope so.
-
Stanny Onis
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 10:33
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Luke Campbell vs Yvan Mendy
Liam Willians vs Liam Smith 1 & 2
Jamie Mcdonnell vs Lee Haskins & Chris Edwards
Liam Willians vs Liam Smith 1 & 2
Jamie Mcdonnell vs Lee Haskins & Chris Edwards
Last edited by Stanny Onis on 30 Nov 2020, 15:13, edited 1 time in total.
-
Stanny Onis
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 165
- Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 10:33
Re: non-bad prospect losses
Yeah Prices losses to Thompson were probably the WORST prospect losses! He was never the same after those fights.maverick23 wrote: ↑29 Nov 2020, 16:25Not sure I’d go with Price vs Thompson. Price lost a hell of a lot confidence after that fight and was never the same again afterwards.