Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post Reply
TomMichael63!
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 11 Dec 2020, 09:31

Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post by TomMichael63! »

Just curious. Wondering what the historians have to say. From Walker & Greb before him, to Monzon, Hagler, Leonard or Hearns or current day middles - who could have beaten Sugar Ray Robinson in his prime? I personally lean toward Marvin Hagler but want other viewpoints.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 866
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post by Ketchel »

Prime Robinson was not at Middleweight but at Welterweight. Today's Middleweights under bygone rules would be super Middleweight or Light heavyweights. Of the names mentioned Robinson beats Leonard, Walker and Hearns but loses to Hagler and Monzon. Have not seen any footage of Greg to make a decision.
Duran1970
Lightweight
Posts: 934
Joined: 03 Jan 2018, 14:20

Re: Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post by Duran1970 »

Jake Lamotta.. the only one
Maybe Sam Langford
Djanders44
Welterweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 02 Jan 2016, 00:43

Re: Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post by Djanders44 »

In multiple fights, say best of five, nobody, in my opinion, beats a prime Sugar Ray Robinson, in his weight class.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Historian opinion poll - Robinson

Post by DrDuke »

So, are we talking about middleweight? It wasn't his best weight. Possibly Greb would win. The likes of Monzon, Benvenuti, Griffith, Tiger, Leonard, Hagler and Hearns would win too, without much doubt. The likes of Toney, Jones, Nunn, McCallum could also win more often than not. Maybe even Hopkins, considering the fact that Robinson lost to the other dirty and foulish hugging machine Gene Fullmer.
Post Reply