Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Djanders44
Welterweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 02 Jan 2016, 00:43

Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Djanders44 »

12 Rounds. Primes. Hmmm.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5713
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

Evander
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5713
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

I figure norton and frazier gave ali a lot of trouble and holyfield is better than them and quicker
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

To me Holyfield represents Ali's stylistic kryptonite.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13875
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by DrDuke »

Yeah, Holy would pressure Ali no less than Smokin' Joe, but Evander also was faster, more diverse and no less tough. Holy by dec.
Woldemar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 6284
Joined: 03 Jul 2014, 07:52

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Woldemar »

Holy close decision
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

DrDuke wrote: 29 Dec 2020, 06:30 Yeah, Holy would pressure Ali no less than Smokin' Joe, but Evander also was faster, more diverse and no less tough. Holy by dec.
Plus aside from pressure and strength. Holyfield wasn't too shabby when it came to Boxing and Moving either He had several wrinkles to his game.
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4603
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by scorpio83 »

IMHO: Your opinions would be an unpopular one because you each think Holy would beat the prime Ali, but this is the prime Ali, who would never allow Holyfield to counter him. Holyfield never face an opponent from a different era who is the GOAT and he's quicker than Chris Byrd.

12 Rounds is not enough, but 15 rounds is more interesting as Holyfield has a different style from Frazier and Norton. Holyfield would pressure and give Ali problems early on, but Ali would box and move around Holyfield behind his long range flurry without stopping on his pedal stood. After out-boxing Holyfield in 15 rounds, Ali would win by decision.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17037
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Seamus »

Mover version of Ali would be too quick and mobile for Holyfield and would take a clear decision.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

scorpio83 wrote: 29 Dec 2020, 10:32 IMHO: Your opinions would be an unpopular one because you each think Holy would beat the prime Ali, but this is the prime Ali, who would never allow Holyfield to counter him. Holyfield never face an opponent from a different era who is the GOAT and he's quicker than Chris Byrd.

12 Rounds is not enough, but 15 rounds is more interesting as Holyfield has a different style from Frazier and Norton. Holyfield would pressure and give Ali problems early on, but Ali would box and move around Holyfield behind his long range flurry without stopping on his pedal stood. After out-boxing Holyfield in 15 rounds, Ali would win by decision.
Neither of them ever faced a fighter like each other. It would be a competitive bout no doubt, but Holyfield has all the tools to potentially defeat Ali. Even Prime Ali.

Would he beat every time? Highly doubtful.

Could he beat him once? Certainly.

Also I don't know why you mentioned Chris Byrd here. Holyfield was well past his prime for the Chris Byrd fight.
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4603
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by scorpio83 »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Dec 2020, 10:40
scorpio83 wrote: 29 Dec 2020, 10:32 IMHO: Your opinions would be an unpopular one because you each think Holy would beat the prime Ali, but this is the prime Ali, who would never allow Holyfield to counter him. Holyfield never face an opponent from a different era who is the GOAT and he's quicker than Chris Byrd.

12 Rounds is not enough, but 15 rounds is more interesting as Holyfield has a different style from Frazier and Norton. Holyfield would pressure and give Ali problems early on, but Ali would box and move around Holyfield behind his long range flurry without stopping on his pedal stood. After out-boxing Holyfield in 15 rounds, Ali would win by decision.
Neither of them ever faced a fighter like each other. It would be a competitive bout no doubt, but Holyfield has all the tools to potentially defeat Ali. Even Prime Ali.

Would he beat every time? Highly doubtful.

Could he beat him once? Certainly.

Also I don't know why you mentioned Chris Byrd here. Holyfield was well past his prime for the Chris Byrd fight.
I hold Holyfield at a high regard and yes, he was past his prime when he fought Byrd and that's the example of this boxer. Michael "Dynamite" Dokes is the better example who had quick speed and the same Dokes, whom Holyfield fought him early his prime at heavyweight. However, Ali was quicker than Dokes and if they make it a mythical trilogy series, then Holyfield could take the first fight by decision and Ali would take the next 2 fights with both also by decision in a close fight.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15678
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by elmersalsa »

Ali on points.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7160
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Nile4000 »

Seamus wrote: 29 Dec 2020, 10:37 Mover version of Ali would be too quick and mobile for Holyfield and would take a clear decision.
Concur.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15678
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by elmersalsa »

The Real Deal was much more of a complete fighter than The Greatest. But, I don't think that Evander has ever fight a guy with the speed of Ali.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13875
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by DrDuke »

elmersalsa wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 11:35 The Real Deal was much more of a complete fighter than The Greatest. But, I don't think that Evander has ever fight a guy with the speed of Ali.
Ali also fought only once against the guy of about the same level of toughness, workrate and durability in prime. And he lost.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

DrDuke wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 17:10
elmersalsa wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 11:35 The Real Deal was much more of a complete fighter than The Greatest. But, I don't think that Evander has ever fight a guy with the speed of Ali.
Ali also fought only once against the guy of about the same level of toughness, workrate and durability in prime. And he lost.
You're referring to Frazier, and honestly I would consider Holyfield to be a more complete fighter than Frazier.

I think Holyfield has most of the strengths that Frazier and Norton brought to the table, and then some.

He doesn't have as great of a Left Hook as Frazier, but a more complete arsenal overall, and I don't think there's really anything Norton does that Holyfield doesn't do better, and those were the 2 guys who beat the best versions of Ali who ever took a loss.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13875
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by DrDuke »

gilgamesh wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 17:15
DrDuke wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 17:10
elmersalsa wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 11:35 The Real Deal was much more of a complete fighter than The Greatest. But, I don't think that Evander has ever fight a guy with the speed of Ali.
Ali also fought only once against the guy of about the same level of toughness, workrate and durability in prime. And he lost.
You're referring to Frazier, and honestly I would consider Holyfield to be a more complete fighter than Frazier.

I think Holyfield has most of the strengths that Frazier and Norton brought to the table, and then some.

He doesn't have as great of a Left Hook as Frazier, but a more complete arsenal overall, and I don't think there's really anything Norton does that Holyfield doesn't do better, and those were the 2 guys who beat the best versions of Ali who ever took a loss.
Right, Holy was even better than those.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

Basically of all the possible ATG's you could match against Ali. I think Holyfield is THE WORST possible opponent for him.

As difficult a matchup as you could imagine for Ali.

Styles make fights, and Holyfield's style is gonna be a nightmare for Ali. Every time.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Onetimeonly »

My second favorite fighter ever and I think Ali is bad news for evander. Oddly, Gil, I think evander had a tighter hook than Joe. What Norton did better than holy was take away the jab. Holyfield was probably the greatest counter puncher in heavyweight history, but chasing down the fastest heavyweight ever with a long stick in his face is far from ideal. 10-5 Ali
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46381
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by gilgamesh »

I would think he'd be pushing him to the ropes, and trying to muscle him. Like Norton did. He'd know better than to try to outbox Ali surely. He'd have to draw him into a fight.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Onetimeonly »

He would have to try, but not his preferred style. He was a bit past it, but he struggled mightily to get Lewis to engage.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15678
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by elmersalsa »

Onetimeonly wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 21:33 He would have to try, but not his preferred style. He was a bit past it, but he struggled mightily to get Lewis to engage.
Holy was ringworn when he fought Lennox. The fight with Vaughn Bean was the writing on the wall.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Onetimeonly »

elmersalsa wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 22:06
Onetimeonly wrote: 31 Dec 2020, 21:33 He would have to try, but not his preferred style. He was a bit past it, but he struggled mightily to get Lewis to engage.
Holy was ringworn when he fought Lennox. The fight with Vaughn Bean was the writing on the wall.
Ali was harder to corner, obviously. Happy new year Elmer. I hope 2021 eases your senility.
Cojimar 1946
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1692
Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Cojimar 1946 »

Wouldn't someone with a higher workrate have a better shot at beating Ali? Evander at heavyweight didn't throw 800+ punches per fight.
Djanders44
Welterweight
Posts: 190
Joined: 02 Jan 2016, 00:43

Re: Heavyweights: Evander Holyfield vs. Muhammad Ali

Post by Djanders44 »

My pick is Evander by split decision win.
Post Reply