Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Question

Overrated
41
16%
Underrated
80
32%
Neither
130
52%
 
Total votes: 251

Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Yeah I thought that’s why RJJ looked apologetic, it wasn’t actually a punch.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22936
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by mickey1975 »

Why was Lennox’s cv insane? Tucker, the Croatian bloke, Tua, Morrison, getting chinned twice, a past it Tyson. The one fighter we all wanted to see he never boxed!
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by coghaugen11 »

Ruddock, Holyfield, Mercer, Bruno, Mason, McCall, Biggs, Tucker, Golota, Vitali, Tua, Grant, Bowe in Oly final, Briggs, Tyson - insane.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Deserter »

coghaugen11 wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:04 Ruddock, Holyfield, Mercer, Bruno, Mason, McCall, Biggs, Tucker, Golota, Vitali, Tua, Grant, Bowe in Oly final, Briggs, Tyson - insane.
But he wasn't brave enough to face Eubank... there will always be that mark against him...
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by stujones »

Whatever the shot in their contest - A Roy Jones' with a hint of ambition would have followed it up. I honestly believe that was was the most hurt / buzzed Calzaghe was in his career, legal shot or not. Jones though after the Tarver rematch always seemed to be more content in going the distance and proving to fans / critics he had a chin as opposed to winning the big fights. Did something similar vs Trinidad the fight before. The 24/7 in the build up was not good viewing, Jones' seemed more content to enjoy the "last few fights" - play sparring with his fat friend.

Re Hopkins - can see the point, but I will disagree - as you probably know I scored the fight for Hopkins and I think that extra bit of youth and critically speed of Hopkins of the late 90s, turn of the millenium would have been too much for Joe - especially as Joe was dogged with injuries at that time himself. Whilst their fight was a super bore, I think it the corner work was very telling that night. Enzo had completely lost it and they needed the guile of Dean Powell to really get back some control and get Joe back on track..... on the other side, tellingly IMO, Freddie Roach (whether you agree or not) really thought Bernard had in the bag and there was no urgency there...... basically I felt Roach thought all Hopkins' needed to do was survive from about the 10th and the title was his - Roach was furious at the decision..... I honestly think had that had been RIchardson in the corner, Hopkins would have won beyond doubt that night also - always open to debate though. Whilst Joe has been interviewed since and seems give an air that he knew it was always in the bag, his reaction post fight was not one of someone who thought he won (whether it was down to fighting abroad or whatever). Just my feeling that Hopkins had lost more than Calzaghe at that stage of their career, still both were exceptional fighters but Hopkins' needed to dictate the pace in the tail end of his career and for the most part he did - but when he didn't, he struggled. I just think in 2001 etc there was a little bit more speed and stamina in his tank than in 2008. The extra weight also probably suited Joe more than Bernard.

You make a valid point re Calzaghe also not being a constant - I guess the fact he put a career best display so late in his career makes it harder to really pin point when his peak was - similar to Hopkins and Holyfield also for that matter. The biggest question mark around Calzaghe was his own power. When you watch his amateur fight against Dean Francis you can see there was some real potential in terms of his power - but the sad aspect was that his early pro career were against some real poor opposition and when he stepped up, that's when the damage to his hands really became apparent also. So I think the one massive question mark will always be - what would have happened had his hands not played up. Would he have been KOing the likes of Robin Reid or was the fact he was stepping up always going to impact on his number of KO's - that's the big question I will always have about Calzaghe.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by stujones »

THEBUTCH wrote: 13 Jan 2021, 20:30 Lewis and Froch stand head & shoulders above the rest when it comes down to the quality of opposition faced.
Problem with Lewis for me was his didn't quite fight Holyfield in Holyfield's prime.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

stujones wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:35 Whatever the shot in their contest - A Roy Jones' with a hint of ambition would have followed it up. I honestly believe that was was the most hurt / buzzed Calzaghe was in his career, legal shot or not. Jones though after the Tarver rematch always seemed to be more content in going the distance and proving to fans / critics he had a chin as opposed to winning the big fights. Did something similar vs Trinidad the fight before. The 24/7 in the build up was not good viewing, Jones' seemed more content to enjoy the "last few fights" - play sparring with his fat friend.
Yeh, he dropped Tito twice as well, but was happy coasting to a decision win.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by coghaugen11 »

Deserter wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:24
coghaugen11 wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:04 Ruddock, Holyfield, Mercer, Bruno, Mason, McCall, Biggs, Tucker, Golota, Vitali, Tua, Grant, Bowe in Oly final, Briggs, Tyson - insane.
But he wasn't brave enough to face Eubank... there will always be that mark against him...
Weird.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by coghaugen11 »

stujones wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:35 Whatever the shot in their contest - A Roy Jones' with a hint of ambition would have followed it up. I honestly believe that was was the most hurt / buzzed Calzaghe was in his career, legal shot or not.
Wow, he was far more hurt and buzzed against Mitchell. Not even remotely close. Dropped like a sack of spuds and momentarily out.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by stujones »

I agree he looked very buzzed when rising against Mitchell....but I thought he was buzzed for longer against Jones. At least Mitchell went for it.
BroughtonRulesRefuge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2762
Joined: 16 Dec 2008, 06:55

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by BroughtonRulesRefuge »

stujones wrote: 14 Jan 2021, 08:35 Whatever the shot in their contest - A Roy Jones' with a hint of ambition would have followed it up. I honestly believe that was was the most hurt / buzzed Calzaghe was in his career, legal shot or not. Jones though after the Tarver rematch always seemed to be more content in going the distance and proving to fans / critics he had a chin as opposed to winning the big fights. Did something similar vs Trinidad the fight before. The 24/7 in the build up was not good viewing, Jones' seemed more content to enjoy the "last few fights" - play sparring with his fat friend.

Re Hopkins - can see the point, but I will disagree - as you probably know I scored the fight for Hopkins and I think that extra bit of youth and critically speed of Hopkins of the late 90s, turn of the millenium would have been too much for Joe - especially as Joe was dogged with injuries at that time himself. Whilst their fight was a super bore, I think it the corner work was very telling that night. Enzo had completely lost it and they needed the guile of Dean Powell to really get back some control and get Joe back on track..... on the other side, tellingly IMO, Freddie Roach (whether you agree or not) really thought Bernard had in the bag and there was no urgency there...... basically I felt Roach thought all Hopkins' needed to do was survive from about the 10th and the title was his - Roach was furious at the decision..... I honestly think had that had been RIchardson in the corner, Hopkins would have won beyond doubt that night also - always open to debate though. Whilst Joe has been interviewed since and seems give an air that he knew it was always in the bag, his reaction post fight was not one of someone who thought he won (whether it was down to fighting abroad or whatever). Just my feeling that Hopkins had lost more than Calzaghe at that stage of their career, still both were exceptional fighters but Hopkins' needed to dictate the pace in the tail end of his career and for the most part he did - but when he didn't, he struggled. I just think in 2001 etc there was a little bit more speed and stamina in his tank than in 2008. The extra weight also probably suited Joe more than Bernard.

You make a valid point re Calzaghe also not being a constant - I guess the fact he put a career best display so late in his career makes it harder to really pin point when his peak was - similar to Hopkins and Holyfield also for that matter. The biggest question mark around Calzaghe was his own power. When you watch his amateur fight against Dean Francis you can see there was some real potential in terms of his power - but the sad aspect was that his early pro career were against some real poor opposition and when he stepped up, that's when the damage to his hands really became apparent also. So I think the one massive question mark will always be - what would have happened had his hands not played up. Would he have been KOing the likes of Robin Reid or was the fact he was stepping up always going to impact on his number of KO's - that's the big question I will always have about Calzaghe.

- Guess you weren't around then.

Popkins high pt was Tito post 9/11. After making gruel purses under DKing, he signed a big $ contract with Lou Dibella who lined up Joe and the Roy rematch when both near their high Pts.

Popkins balked to end up owing Lou $3mil broken contract by the court judgement. Enter Oscar who made Popkins his first $ enough to settle with Lou such that now Poppy a wealthy fella.

Curious you had him winning after Joe slapped his beltline that sent him down on all fours yelping like a kicked cur. Has a history of this kinda sissy behavior before and after until his last fight.

Before they all eventually fought, I watched just about ever Roy, Joe, and Popkins fight. Roy and Joe always impressed. Popkins propped up by King obviously inferior vs inferior comp who won his first title on an obvious error by the ref who admitted his mistake when shown the footage. That was his 3rd title fight after 2 miserable previous showings.

I could go on, but really, Popkins is embarrasing. If you want to claim him, no prob, just don't adulterate your facts.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by coghaugen11 »

Hopkins had no real competition on his middleweight reign. The stacked era off of the 70s/80s conveyor belt had ended. The first useful young middle he faced in 12 years was Jermain Taylor.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5841
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by tonyevs »

The Super Six forced him to fight these fighters, win, lose or draw! Paid very handsomely. Why wouldn’t he.....
Thats always been my point when the quality of Frochs record is discussed: he simply had nowhere else to earn money.
Knowing now what an egotistic fella Froch is, its a certainty he would have taken the easiest route available for him to avoid having that nose job he required after he retired.
Also - Froch lost a few of those fights too. Proving he never was at the level Calzaghe was.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6629
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by THEBUTCH »

Calzaghe was more inclined to the easy route than Froch ever was.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Coco »

Hopkins would have never tried to get JC disqualified if he thought he was winning.

Also there was an deal for Hopkins v JC years back but Hopkins doubled his price the night before.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Deserter »

Coco wrote: 15 Jan 2021, 15:10 Hopkins would have never tried to get JC disqualified if he thought he was winning.

Also there was an deal for Hopkins v JC years back but Hopkins doubled his price the night before.
Both true.
smiling assassin
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 3196
Joined: 05 Jan 2012, 13:12

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by smiling assassin »

Deserter wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:18
Coco wrote: 15 Jan 2021, 15:10 Hopkins would have never tried to get JC disqualified if he thought he was winning.

Also there was an deal for Hopkins v JC years back but Hopkins doubled his price the night before.
Both true.
He didn’t want to get beat by a white boy
cfang
Middleweight
Posts: 946
Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 16:50

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by cfang »

I don't see a question mark on joe. He wanted the big fights but they just weren't there. When they were he took advantage. Finished undefeated and his close win against bhop lools v impressive in light of bhops fights after.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

smiling assassin wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:59
Deserter wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:18
Coco wrote: 15 Jan 2021, 15:10 Hopkins would have never tried to get JC disqualified if he thought he was winning.

Also there was an deal for Hopkins v JC years back but Hopkins doubled his price the night before.
Both true.
He didn’t want to get beat by a white boy
Did he lose to a white boi? Is Kovalev classed as a white boi?

How about before Calzaghe fight?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13360
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by jameswilson »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 21:08
smiling assassin wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:59
Deserter wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:18

Both true.
He didn’t want to get beat by a white boy
Did he lose to a white boi? Is Kovalev classed as a white boi?

How about before Calzaghe fight?
Well I’m guessing not before Calzaghe otherwise shouting ‘I’d never let a white boy beat me’ in the middle of a huge crowd would sound fairly stupid wouldn’t it?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100697
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

jameswilson wrote: 17 Jan 2021, 08:24
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 21:08
smiling assassin wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:59

He didn’t want to get beat by a white boy
Did he lose to a white boi? Is Kovalev classed as a white boi?

How about before Calzaghe fight?
Well I’m guessing not before Calzaghe otherwise shouting ‘I’d never let a white boy beat me’ in the middle of a huge crowd would sound fairly stupid wouldn’t it?
Only ones he lost to was after.. kovalev and Joe Smith who knocked his silly ass out the ring.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Boxerbeetle »

jameswilson wrote: 17 Jan 2021, 08:24
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 21:08
smiling assassin wrote: 16 Jan 2021, 13:59

He didn’t want to get beat by a white boy
Did he lose to a white boi? Is Kovalev classed as a white boi?

How about before Calzaghe fight?
Well I’m guessing not before Calzaghe otherwise shouting ‘I’d never let a white boy beat me’ in the middle of a huge crowd would sound fairly stupid wouldn’t it?
:lol:
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

THEBUTCH wrote: 15 Jan 2021, 15:01 Calzaghe was more inclined to the easy route than Froch ever was.
No doubt there.

If only hed had Frochs balls.

He would probably have lost a few, but he would have been remembered with a lot more affection.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39203
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya, just like everyone is so affectionate about froch and doesnt like to slag him off
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Joe Calzaghe - Question Mark

Post by Noxy »

I don’t think people necessarily liked Carl. We certainly enjoyed his career though.
Post Reply