fighters ruined by first loss

Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Onetimeonly »

Coco wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 05:26 I'm thinking Victor Oganov(sp), was like 20-0 with 20ko's and touted as an unstoppable machine.

However his loss prob demonstrated his true level rather than ruining him.
Lol, I remember seeing that guy for the first time when he lost and being more shocked he was highly touted than he lost.
NoScoutingReports
Lightweight
Posts: 3238
Joined: 21 Jan 2018, 16:28

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by NoScoutingReports »

Cletus Seldin was taken on by HBO and was being completely overhyped after beating a string of low level opponents before he finally met a solid operator in Yves Ulysse Jr, who comprehensively outboxed him on the BJS v Lemieux undercard. HBO dropped him after this reality check and he returned to beating low level operators (Zab excluded, obviously hugely past his best at the time).
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103157
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

NoScoutingReports wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 08:02 Cletus Seldin was taken on by HBO and was being completely overhyped after beating a string of low level opponents before he finally met a solid operator in Yves Ulysse Jr, who comprehensively outboxed him on the BJS v Lemieux undercard. HBO dropped him after this reality check and he returned to beating low level operators (Zab excluded, obviously hugely past his best at the time).
Ah yes. Remember him.

I remember him being dropped and outboxed.

He was on a number of HBO cards that year alone.

He set some sort of record of tied RJJ for HBO. Number of fights on HBO in 12 months? Don’t know if it was that, or something else. Maybe some one can help me out.

Anyway. The Hebrew Hammer was never the same.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Deserter »

Toko Olajide was one I was trying to remember earlier (Michael's younger, apparently more talented brother). Found this ring article on him that captures it better than I can:

What he was supposed to be:The junior middleweight champion of the world and quite possibly a pound-for-pounder. That’s how much talent Michael Olajide’s kid brother had. He could score spectacular knockouts while backing up, and truly appeared to be playing above the rim when matched with mere mortals. Everyone who saw him fight was convinced he was going far.

What went wrong:One punch from previously unknown Epifanio Mendoza led to a broken fibula and a dislocated ankle as Olajide crashed to the floor, and though his leg healed, mentally, he was never the same. He lost a close decision to Ian Gardner four fights later and hung up the gloves for good in 2004 at age 27. A deep thinker, a talented jazz trumpet player and an aspiring writer, he just wasn’t as eager to punch people for a living as we were to watch him do it.

Full article is worth a read as it covers other prospects who fell short of their apparent potential - some names I'd forgotten in there like Ricardo Williams:
https://www.ringtv.com/120539-heartbrea ... they-seem/
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8082
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Lenny Cravats »

gilgamesh wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 13:28
Lenny Cravats wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:26 Deontay Wilder
Can you see into the future? Because he hasn't fought since that loss.
No, but his reaction to his first loss is way beyond what one would expect. Maybe he will bounce back, but losing that fight has had an incredibly profound effect on his mental state.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23088
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by mickey1975 »

Lenny Cravats wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 10:19
gilgamesh wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 13:28
Lenny Cravats wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:26 Deontay Wilder
Can you see into the future? Because he hasn't fought since that loss.
No, but his reaction to his first loss is way beyond what one would expect. Maybe he will bounce back, but losing that fight has had an incredibly profound effect on his mental state.
Probably the worst I’ve seen. He can’t believe it’s possible to get beat.
Foggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 12:07

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Foggy »

Kell Brook 👍
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Coco »

Foggy wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 11:58 Kell Brook 👍
Good shout
high tower 1
Lightweight
Posts: 1610
Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 09:36

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by high tower 1 »

Kid chocolate
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by polecateddy »

Quite a number of Wlad’s title challengers I seem to recall.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46956
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by gilgamesh »

polecateddy wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 14:17 Quite a number of Wlad’s title challengers I seem to recall.
Several of those guys were never that good in the first place :lol:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26633
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by KiwiRider »

NoScoutingReports wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 08:02 Cletus Seldin was taken on by HBO and was being completely overhyped after beating a string of low level opponents before he finally met a solid operator in Yves Ulysse Jr, who comprehensively outboxed him on the BJS v Lemieux undercard. HBO dropped him after this reality check and he returned to beating low level operators (Zab excluded, obviously hugely past his best at the time).
To be fair to the Hebrew Hammer, he wasn't ruined by his first loss. He was simply knocked back to where he belonged. Still has decent power, and making money.
rubberneck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 19 Oct 2003, 08:28

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by rubberneck »

Steveh583 wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:07 bute. rico hoye. naseem hamed.
I seem to recall Rico Hoye was being touted as the next Tommy Hearns, mainly because of the Detroit/Kronk connection. It was great to watch him get beaten live on the BBC. Turned out he wasn’t that good anyway.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46956
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by gilgamesh »

rubberneck wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:30
Steveh583 wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:07 bute. rico hoye. naseem hamed.
I seem to recall Rico Hoye was being touted as the next Tommy Hearns, mainly because of the Detroit/Kronk connection. It was great to watch him get beaten live on the BBC. Turned out he wasn’t that good anyway.
Before he officially lost I thought Rico Hoye was lucky to get the decision over Montell Griffin. Griffin beat him I thought.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28506
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Coco »

Matthew Ellis
NoScoutingReports
Lightweight
Posts: 3238
Joined: 21 Jan 2018, 16:28

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by NoScoutingReports »

KiwiRider wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:16
NoScoutingReports wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 08:02 Cletus Seldin was taken on by HBO and was being completely overhyped after beating a string of low level opponents before he finally met a solid operator in Yves Ulysse Jr, who comprehensively outboxed him on the BJS v Lemieux undercard. HBO dropped him after this reality check and he returned to beating low level operators (Zab excluded, obviously hugely past his best at the time).
To be fair to the Hebrew Hammer, he wasn't ruined by his first loss. He was simply knocked back to where he belonged. Still has decent power, and making money.
Yeah, fair point mate. I suppose it ruined the illusion that he could compete at the highest level as opposed to ruining his career completely. He was exposed in front of a large TV audience but at the same time he's found his level because of it I guess.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Cyclops »

Chad Dawson probably deserves an honourable mention. He'll won't be remembered for being as good as he was even though he was extremely good: lost a strange one to Pascal and then was banjoed by Andre Ward a fight removed later and fell off a cliff form wise after that.

People forget he beat Hopkins much easier than Calzaghe: in fact Hopkins was terrified of him, and Joe didn't seem to be in too much of a rush to fight him either. An incredible waste.

I don't think he was the smartest guy. I hope he made some money.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 8082
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Lenny Cravats »

rubberneck wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:30
Steveh583 wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:07 bute. rico hoye. naseem hamed.
I seem to recall Rico Hoye was being touted as the next Tommy Hearns, mainly because of the Detroit/Kronk connection. It was great to watch him get beaten live on the BBC. Turned out he wasn’t that good anyway.
Clinton Woods was on top form that night.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by Counter-puncher »

Lenny Cravats wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 18:30
rubberneck wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:30
Steveh583 wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 06:07 bute. rico hoye. naseem hamed.
I seem to recall Rico Hoye was being touted as the next Tommy Hearns, mainly because of the Detroit/Kronk connection. It was great to watch him get beaten live on the BBC. Turned out he wasn’t that good anyway.
Clinton Woods was on top form that night.
He certainly was. Hoye was the epitome of the chinny vulnerable banger with questionable fundamentals but Woods was super-sharp as well.
JxhDel.
Lightweight
Posts: 2517
Joined: 14 Dec 2017, 05:28

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by JxhDel. »

Tavoris Cloud, Anthony Olajide.
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by knockout »

Looking through this thread there are two categories here :

1) the hyped amateur stars who underachieved and the well protected pros - who got beat when they stepped up to the top. Lacy / Gonzales / Reid etc ... some were never good enough , other were too shop worn when they got the big fight and others were thrown to the lions by a promoter who was chasing out (Biggs).

2) the proven stars who just finally had too many miles on the clock or lost the love for the game . Vargas / Hamed / Bowe
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26633
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by KiwiRider »

NoScoutingReports wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:53
KiwiRider wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:16
NoScoutingReports wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 08:02 Cletus Seldin was taken on by HBO and was being completely overhyped after beating a string of low level opponents before he finally met a solid operator in Yves Ulysse Jr, who comprehensively outboxed him on the BJS v Lemieux undercard. HBO dropped him after this reality check and he returned to beating low level operators (Zab excluded, obviously hugely past his best at the time).
To be fair to the Hebrew Hammer, he wasn't ruined by his first loss. He was simply knocked back to where he belonged. Still has decent power, and making money.
Yeah, fair point mate. I suppose it ruined the illusion that he could compete at the highest level as opposed to ruining his career completely. He was exposed in front of a large TV audience but at the same time he's found his level because of it I guess.
:TU: I thought highly of him up until the loss- as in a solid rising contender. Partly from commentators hype, but also from some big KO shots in his fights leading prior.
I'm still a fan, don't get me wrong, my expectations have just been adjusted somewhat ;-)
You still get a solid performance from a guy who puts on a great show.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by world ranked »

stujones wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 17:39 Not physically at all...but Junior Witter lost any chance of being a star (shamefully I must add) after the Judah fight
I thought of this but did he fairly well after his first loss but his second loss was start of the end for him.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by world ranked »

Tuan_Jim wrote: 23 Jan 2021, 20:57 Shane Mosley never looked totally right after Vernon Forrest beat him silly
I would say that Margarito fight and even the Cotto fight he looked pretty damn good.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: fighters ruined by first loss

Post by world ranked »

Cyclops wrote: 24 Jan 2021, 16:56 Chad Dawson probably deserves an honourable mention. He'll won't be remembered for being as good as he was even though he was extremely good: lost a strange one to Pascal and then was banjoed by Andre Ward a fight removed later and fell off a cliff form wise after that.

People forget he beat Hopkins much easier than Calzaghe: in fact Hopkins was terrified of him, and Joe didn't seem to be in too much of a rush to fight him either. An incredible waste.

I don't think he was the smartest guy. I hope he made some money.
That Adamek win was underrated as well. I dont Dawson was a waste. He was a decent champ. never great but not a waste. I'm not sure how who beat very good fighters and world champs is a waste of a career.
Post Reply