I've been debating and and discussing the judging issue in boxing for years. It's the reason why the fightnight scores scorecard system exists!!maverick23 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2021, 19:46There may be nice hotels/meals/drinks for judges but I’d be amazed if there’s anything more formal than that and if it was happening with one promoter then I’d maybe expect more to it but it’s all promoters. I listened to an interview with Jon Pegg the other day. One judge had the Eggington vs Theophane fight level after 6 rounds (Theophane was promoter’s fighter at that point).margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Feb 2021, 19:32i think there is for sure some element of corruption, some extra incentive being provided for the judges to go for the homeboi, which they constantly do to a hugely disporportionate degree. it doesnt have to necessarily be bags of cash and all that, and im not specifically saying your man eddeh's behind itmaverick23 wrote: ↑13 Feb 2021, 19:23
What else could it be then? The promoter doesn’t appoint the judges, the board does. So has Eddie bribed Robert Smith to get the judges he wants? Or does he have all the judges in his back pocket?
I agree my argument makes them very very shady but I still think it’s incompetence because they don’t want to upset the status quo so take the ‘easy’ decision.
and i mean, having a predetermined unfair bias to score in favour of someone simply because you know theyre more popular is for sure corruption too, it's not being a poor judge who cant tell a clean hit from a swing and a miss
Corruption involves someone gaining from doing something which I don’t think this is and may not even be pre-determined but if they’re mulling over who to give a round to the vast majority of the time they go for the ‘easy’ option. Whether you call it corruption or incompetence or whatever it needs addressing and needs to stop.
Back in 2017 (as it was when I made the initial concept), I was wondering why and arguing the fact that in this day and age of technology, is boxing the only one not to take up modern tech to improve things.
Why are they still doing scorecards on pen and paper? Apart from compubox, which isn't by any means accurate and is only used for TV analysis, why doesn't boxing try new things with tech?
I created a boxing scorecard with the added requirement of adding a valid reason along with the 10 pont must scores.
This very minor addition means the judge must at least put SOME thought into why they are indicating a round was won
It answers the question "how the f*!k did they score that round like that?", which us fight fans continually ask!
It provides a snapshot of their thinking at that moment in time. It's not revolutionary, but it adds some kind of countability to the official if they had to provide that one extra detail on their scorecard. And my system provides a set number of possible reasons to select from why the round was won!
As well as adding some accountability, there would be no need for the strange delays when adding up scorecards at the end of fights. Electronic cards will tally up the totals instantly with no need for discussions or dodgy corrections!
But boxing is a dinosaur, and it'll probably always be resistent to any changes that rock the boat!