Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Martin...
As a result of the new rule, I'm curious what the biggest differences are in the all-time ratings?
As a result of the new rule, I'm curious what the biggest differences are in the all-time ratings?
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7432
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Mikey Garcia #4 at WW is a little questionable. I see Oscar Valdez also jumped up to #2 at 130, maybe there needs to be slightly more penalty for weight jumping?
Also Taylor back up at #1 at 140 but Ramirez way down from #1 to #4. I wonder what happened there.
Also Taylor back up at #1 at 140 but Ramirez way down from #1 to #4. I wonder what happened there.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Due to the stay busy bout rule, best rating within 18 months as long boxer has clear wins:jujigatame wrote: ↑18 Feb 2021, 22:59 Mikey Garcia #4 at WW is a little questionable. I see Oscar Valdez also jumped up to #2 at 130, maybe there needs to be slightly more penalty for weight jumping?
Also Taylor back up at #1 at 140 but Ramirez way down from #1 to #4. I wonder what happened there.
- Valdez now has his 114.2 points from 2019-11-30 (until 2021-05-30)
- Taylor now has his 296.1 points from 2019-10-26 (until 2021-04-26)
- Prograis now has his 267.7 points from same bout
- Zepada now has his 210.6 points from 2019-09-14 (until 2021-03-14)
- Ramirez has still his 208.5 points from his close last bout
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
And what happened from the dates of birth of the fighters. Why is it not displayed ???
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Clear. Sorry. Very uncomfortable(...computerrank wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 14:35General Data Protection Regulation GDPR of the European Union
https://gdpr-info.eu/
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
and if the athletes consent to the dissemination of personal data.mike1989 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 15:55Clear. Sorry. Very uncomfortable(...computerrank wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 14:35General Data Protection Regulation GDPR of the European Union
https://gdpr-info.eu/
For example by checking a box when creating a fighter profile ???
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
This is not final decision of Boxrec, it is just a precautionary measure guided by legal advice.mike1989 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 16:03and if the athletes consent to the dissemination of personal data.mike1989 wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 15:55Clear. Sorry. Very uncomfortable(...computerrank wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 14:35
General Data Protection Regulation GDPR of the European Union
https://gdpr-info.eu/
For example by checking a box when creating a fighter profile ???
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Always thought it was strange to display full birthdates for the fighters. Why is this info necessary?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39203
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
why's that strange, that happens all the time with athlete listings/bios, it lets you see then how old they were at each phase (and in boxrecs case without having to click on the fight page for every fight)
also, now there is no age or birth info at all for inactive fighters
also, now there is no age or birth info at all for inactive fighters
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
All the American sports list their birthdays. Been that way forever.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 20:00 why's that strange, that happens all the time with athlete listings/bios, it lets you see then how old they were at each phase (and in boxrecs case without having to click on the fight page for every fight)
also, now there is no age or birth info at all for inactive fighters
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Does this also not effect the annual ratings?computerrank wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 05:42The new rule shows no impact to the all-time ratings. The new rule only is applied ad hoc for the current ratings. The WHR ratings are not touched.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Many Americans are obese as well. Is that OK?oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 21:14All the American sports list their birthdays. Been that way forever.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 20:00 why's that strange, that happens all the time with athlete listings/bios, it lets you see then how old they were at each phase (and in boxrecs case without having to click on the fight page for every fight)
also, now there is no age or birth info at all for inactive fighters
Seems irrelevant to me.. if you know their age, why does their full birthdate matter?
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
LOL! Why does it matter to hide it? Why so angry over it?JCS wrote: ↑20 Feb 2021, 00:15Many Americans are obese as well. Is that OK?oogiebe wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 21:14All the American sports list their birthdays. Been that way forever.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑19 Feb 2021, 20:00 why's that strange, that happens all the time with athlete listings/bios, it lets you see then how old they were at each phase (and in boxrecs case without having to click on the fight page for every fight)
also, now there is no age or birth info at all for inactive fighters
Seems irrelevant to me.. if you know their age, why does their full birthdate matter?
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39203
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
and i mean why does birth date specifically get ax'd , what about all the other personal details on the fighters records
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
For birthday date discussion outside of the ratings themselves would you please follow that thread on Boxrec
viewtopic.php?f=1&p=5509457#p5509457
viewtopic.php?f=1&p=5509457#p5509457
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
what is the minimum opposition rating that will lead to a drop in the rating in 18 months ???computerrank wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 17:00I already explained that in the posts before - That means a boxer will keep the highest rating within the last 18 months, as long as his record shows clear wins. So if there are stay busy bouts or clear wins against inferior opponents later, that won't drop the rating ...mike1989 wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 16:45Martin like Yenthony Joshua can have 795 points if he flew to Yndi Ruiz by TKO then won 208 points in Ruiz. Judging by the rating, Ruiz before Joshua had only sacks. After Ruiz, Joshua had Kubrat Pulev 49 points. Then from where in Anthony Joshua 795 points. This is absurd!computerrank wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 15:58 The new stay-busy-bout rule is set life now. The complete changed ratings will be visible after the next daily ratings run on 2021-02-18.
I just for test made an instant update for the ratings of Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua. So you can even now see, Anthony Joshua is now rated #2.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
There is no minimum rating - it depends on the records.mike1989 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2021, 12:59what is the minimum opposition rating that will lead to a drop in the rating in 18 months ???computerrank wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 17:00I already explained that in the posts before - That means a boxer will keep the highest rating within the last 18 months, as long as his record shows clear wins. So if there are stay busy bouts or clear wins against inferior opponents later, that won't drop the rating ...mike1989 wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 16:45
Martin like Yenthony Joshua can have 795 points if he flew to Yndi Ruiz by TKO then won 208 points in Ruiz. Judging by the rating, Ruiz before Joshua had only sacks. After Ruiz, Joshua had Kubrat Pulev 49 points. Then from where in Anthony Joshua 795 points. This is absurd!
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
I do not understand. Can you explain, for example, Anthony Joshua ???computerrank wrote: ↑21 Feb 2021, 17:07There is no minimum rating - it depends on the records.mike1989 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2021, 12:59what is the minimum opposition rating that will lead to a drop in the rating in 18 months ???computerrank wrote: ↑17 Feb 2021, 17:00 I already explained that in the posts before - That means a boxer will keep the highest rating within the last 18 months, as long as his record shows clear wins. So if there are stay busy bouts or clear wins against inferior opponents later, that won't drop the rating ...
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
Anthony Joshua, and what would you like to know, please?mike1989 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 15:49I do not understand. Can you explain, for example, Anthony Joshua ???
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
How does the current rating points change depending on the opposition ??? Let's take Anthony Joshua the period since the fight against Alexander Povetkin ???computerrank wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 16:50Anthony Joshua, and what would you like to know, please?
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
You mean the ratings of Joshua after each of his bouts regarding all bouts of all boxers before each of those bouts. The current ratings in that sense are not available for the past. WHR shows the ratings at time of each bout regarding all bouts before and after that bout. And it would consume far to much computer ressources to calculate those ratings daily, with all those daily new and changed results in history.mike1989 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 17:14How does the current rating points change depending on the opposition ??? Let's take Anthony Joshua the period since the fight against Alexander Povetkin ???
Re: Boxrec with new stay-busy-bout rule now
Yescomputerrank wrote: ↑22 Feb 2021, 17:56You mean the ratings of Joshua after each of his bouts regarding all bouts of all boxers before each of those bouts. The current ratings in that sense are not available for the past. WHR shows the ratings at time of each bout regarding all bouts before and after that bout. And it would consume far to much computer ressources to calculate those ratings daily, with all those daily new and changed results in history.