fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post Reply
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by margaret thatcher »

just thinking if anyone has any examples of this

im watching a sucky fight now through 4 rounds : easter vs martin , and would love for it to break into a slobber knocker


i remember victor ortiz vs berto 1, they traded 2-3 kds each in the first half and it was great stuff. but then the last 6 were basically non stop holding and falling into each other, which is why i could never buy into it being fight of the year even though lots said it was
oogiebe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by oogiebe »

margaret thatcher wrote: 20 Feb 2021, 22:36 just thinking if anyone has any examples of this

im watching a sucky fight now through 4 rounds : easter vs martin , and would love for it to break into a slobber knocker


i remember victor ortiz vs berto 1, they traded 2-3 kds each in the first half and it was great stuff. but then the last 6 were basically non stop holding and falling into each other, which is why i could never buy into it being fight of the year even though lots said it was
Loma/Teo was much better the second half.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya, that's one that heated up for sure after a sucky first half
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32939
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Frampton - Quigg is the obvious example that comes to mind. Gallagher completely fvcked the tactics on that one and Scott did nothing for the first 6 rounds; second half was good though.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by margaret thatcher »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 21 Feb 2021, 05:22 Frampton - Quigg is the obvious example that comes to mind. Gallagher completely fvcked the tactics on that one and Scott did nothing for the first 6 rounds; second half was good though.
:TU:
knockout
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3868
Joined: 11 Jun 2003, 10:00

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by knockout »

Fury v Wilder 1 ... pretty dull bar the 2 KDs and Tyson’s amazing recovery in the 12th
gb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 379
Joined: 19 Jul 2007, 03:29

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by gb »

At the risk of being controversial, I'll go with the Rumble In The Jungle. Edge of the seat stuff early on because of Foreman's power, then both seem knackered from about round 3 onwards and pretty stodgy stuff ensues for a number of rounds, then the combination pretty much out of nowhere that ends it.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by deadpan »

Benn-Galvano 2. A snoozefest apart from Nigel getting clipped in the final few seconds and looking a bit wobbly. And then Galvano celebrating as though it warranted him getting the points verdict, the dolt.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by bigjack »

deadpan wrote: 21 Feb 2021, 12:45 Benn-Galvano 2. A snoozefest apart from Nigel getting clipped in the final few seconds and looking a bit wobbly. And then Galvano celebrating as though it warranted him getting the points verdict, the dolt.
I've just watched this again,did Galvano think the ref had stepped in at the end ?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by margaret thatcher »

good calls bruhs :bag:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by orbtastic »

Mike Jones and Randall Bailey - 11 rounds of tedium, punctuated by two big punches, one of them ending the fight.

Chris John Rocky Juarez II - Small moment of drama late in the 12th where Juarez hurt him but couldn't finish it off.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by deadpan »

bigjack wrote: 21 Feb 2021, 15:00
deadpan wrote: 21 Feb 2021, 12:45 Benn-Galvano 2. A snoozefest apart from Nigel getting clipped in the final few seconds and looking a bit wobbly. And then Galvano celebrating as though it warranted him getting the points verdict, the dolt.
I've just watched this again,did Galvano think the ref had stepped in at the end ?
I must admit, I'd not watched it since fight night, but just have now. You may be right. Nigel would certainly have been in a world of trouble if it had landed 30 seconds earlier.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39337
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: fights that sucked in one part but were really good in another

Post by margaret thatcher »

orbtastic wrote: 22 Feb 2021, 05:31 Mike Jones and Randall Bailey - 11 rounds of tedium, punctuated by two big punches, one of them ending the fight.

Chris John Rocky Juarez II - Small moment of drama late in the 12th where Juarez hurt him but couldn't finish it off.
:TU:

I remember that first one especially well, and indeed.....bore bore bore bore bore bore, then boom bang done :yay:
Post Reply