boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post Reply
dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by dickbelden »

forrest ?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by margaret thatcher »

he's ranked by the wbc at bridgerweight, and boxrec has a policy of not ranking guys who are ranked by the wbc at bw


https://wbcboxing.com/en/bridgerweight/
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by Lackeos »

margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 13:33 he's ranked by the wbc at bridgerweight, and boxrec has a policy of not ranking guys who are ranked by the wbc at bw


https://wbcboxing.com/en/bridgerweight/
lol. That's a goofy policy
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9153
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by gregregegg »

Wow, that is getting extra stupid to not rank guys that are activly fighting at heavyweight.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by watsupdoc87 »

So is this bridgerweight a real thing now? I stopped paying attention as soon as it was announced. Didn't think they'd go ahead with it :bag:
The Gratest
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6495
Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by The Gratest »

He needs to beat someone other than Tom (0-137-1) all the time.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5900
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by joshj909 »

Bridgerweights should just be treated as heavyweights for Boxrec ranking purposes
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by margaret thatcher »

joshj909 wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 04:03 Bridgerweights should just be treated as heavyweights for Boxrec ranking purposes
i agree
Lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 26 May 2002, 12:35

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by Lennox »

https://premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

Jerry Forrest is ranked here.
Bridgerweights ranked as heavyweight or cruiserweights by PBO.
AntonioMartin
Middleweight
Posts: 1690
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 13:19

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by AntonioMartin »

The Gratest wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 03:44 He needs to beat someone other than Tom (0-137-1) all the time.
:lol:

I was just thinking: Jerry who?? (McGuire, Garcia, Springer, West, Orbach, Lewis, Lee Lewis, etc etc??)
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by margaret thatcher »

Shhhh wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 06:21
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 13:33 he's ranked by the wbc at bridgerweight, and boxrec has a policy of not ranking guys who are ranked by the wbc at bw


https://wbcboxing.com/en/bridgerweight/
that a bit weird. If boxrec doesn't recognise Bridgeweight I get it but they should rate them as cruiser or heavy surely.?
ya i agree, i mean it was a hw really since zhang obviously isnt a bridgerweight, plus the other 3 main bodies dont have bridger so forrest is a hw by their standards
Perkin Warbeck
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1896
Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by Perkin Warbeck »

Lackeos wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 17:13
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 13:33 he's ranked by the wbc at bridgerweight, and boxrec has a policy of not ranking guys who are ranked by the wbc at bw


https://wbcboxing.com/en/bridgerweight/
lol. That's a goofy policy
No, it's a good policy.

The last thing the sport of boxing needs is the bridgerweight weight category.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya but then why not rate him at heavy?
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by H8Usernames »

This couldnt be any stranger. Boxrec creating policy and punishing fighters for being ranked.
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by JCS »

Why not just rate the fighters at the division they fought last? And if they ever fight as an "official" Bridgerweight.. they move into Heavyweight?? Seems obvious.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9432
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by tiny_acres »

JCS wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 17:50 Why not just rate the fighters at the division they fought last? And if they ever fight as an "official" Bridgerweight.. they move into Heavyweight?? Seems obvious.
Well logic never seems to work in boxing.🤣🤣
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by The Great John L »

H8Usernames wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 16:58 This couldnt be any stranger. Boxrec creating policy and punishing fighters for being ranked.
It's incredibly bad. I always look to boxrec for ratings that are not affected by any other ratings. Why, in this case, does boxrec now acknowledge a stupid decision by an alphabet organization, especially when it keeps quality fighters from appearting in the boxrec ratings.

It almost sounds like a petty squabble.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by candyslim »

AntonioMartin wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 08:58
The Gratest wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 03:44 He needs to beat someone other than Tom (0-137-1) all the time.
:lol:

I was just thinking: Jerry who?? (McGuire, Garcia, Springer, West, Orbach, Lewis, Lee Lewis, etc etc??)
I immediately thought "Quarry". Guess I'm showing my age.

Many of us have pointed out to John, how illogical it is not to rate these guys at heavyweight if you don't recognize bridgerweight, but he is not listening.

Fair enough I suppose. His website, his rules.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by Lackeos »

Perkin Warbeck wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 16:12
Lackeos wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 17:13
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Feb 2021, 13:33 he's ranked by the wbc at bridgerweight, and boxrec has a policy of not ranking guys who are ranked by the wbc at bw


https://wbcboxing.com/en/bridgerweight/
lol. That's a goofy policy
No, it's a good policy.

The last thing the sport of boxing needs is the bridgerweight weight category.
I'm not suggesting that boxrec add a bridgerweight category to their rankings. But what I AM saying is that boxrec should not be entirely erasing 25 active fighters just because a specific ABC body has chosen to rank them as bridgerweights. Like, they aren't even ranked by boxrec in any division, not even as heavyweights.

This would be like if boxrec decided that they don't like the WBC silver belt, so they removed all WBC silver champions from their divisional rankings. Like... what? You're just going to act like the man doesn't exist because he carries the silver belt (or is ranked by WBC as a bridgerweight)?
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by candyslim »

Eloquently put, Lackeos :salut:
Finkel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1381
Joined: 08 Sep 2018, 20:51

Re: boxrec.com has no rating for jerry

Post by Finkel »

Lennox wrote: 01 Mar 2021, 06:06 https://premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

Jerry Forrest is ranked here.
Bridgerweights ranked as heavyweight or cruiserweights by PBO.
Hey, is your website down? I haven't been able to access it for maybe 2 weeks?
Tried two different connections...
Post Reply