Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

I've been watching the various chronological youtube fights here of his career.
and have noticed that Valuev began wearing the knee-braces on a consistant basis since going into his 43rd fight with
Larry Donald in November 2005. ( at age 32 yrs)
although he can be seen wearing knee braces in one other earlier fight
(his 38th pro fight in February 2004.)
most likely Valuev is a "Macho man" from the old school so most likely he would not have wanted to be seen in the ring with knee braces
( a percieved sign of weakness)unless it was absoutely nessassary.
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Onetimeonly »

Someone that tall isn't made for boxing.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

Onetimeonly wrote: 24 Nov 2018, 16:07 Someone that tall isn't made for boxing.
Like what ? would you recommend that he should made a career of becoming a "Plasterer" 25 years ago instead
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Onetimeonly »

No, he made a lot of money. The chances of him coming out of it with knees was zero.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

September-2007 (49th professional fight)
Last edited by Caractacus on 15 Sep 2020, 15:01, edited 1 time in total.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by BoxBuzz »

I'll say it again, first thing I noticed about the fella was that he was tall.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by oogiebe »

BoxBuzz wrote: 16 Apr 2019, 21:04 I'll say it again, first thing I noticed about the fella was that he was tall.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
and furry.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

Yeah, but how about an evaluation of his acting talent ?
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by DrDuke »

Caractacus wrote: 12 Sep 2020, 13:34 Yeah, but how about an evaluation of his acting talent ?
I know about this movie, but haven't watched it.

While nowadays he's more of a commentator, then an actor. He often appears on the Russian TV, commenting major bouts. He commented Whyte-Povetkin and recent event with Chudinov and Kharitonov. He was awfully biased there.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

50TH Professional Fight.
February 2008





Last edited by Caractacus on 16 Sep 2020, 15:09, edited 6 times in total.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

August 2008-51st proffesional fight.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Controversial »

Size at HW doesn't matter apparently, Valuev was lucky he was a master boxer with fast hands and superb movement.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by DrDuke »

Controversial wrote: 16 Sep 2020, 17:49 Size at HW doesn't matter apparently, Valuev was lucky he was a master boxer with fast hands and superb movement.
He also had a variety of punches in his arsenal. He could connect with thunderous 8-10 punch combinations with impressive accuracy.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39224
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by margaret thatcher »

Controversial wrote: 16 Sep 2020, 17:49 Size at HW doesn't matter apparently, Valuev was lucky he was a master boxer with fast hands and superb movement.
:OhYes:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by DrDuke »

Talking seriously, in this case size wasn't a much defining factor. Valuev was tracked very cautiously and still he was blowing his opportunities, he was awarded wins on several occasions.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Controversial »

DrDuke wrote: 16 Sep 2020, 18:08 Talking seriously, in this case size wasn't a much defining factor. Valuev was tracked very cautiously and still he was blowing his opportunities, he was awarded wins on several occasions.
His size made it difficult for opponents though, he didn't have much amateur experience and admitted himself he never liked the sport but was kind of forced into it because he was so big. So considering his lack of background and that he wasn't in great physical condition he done pretty well, all based on him being so huge and heavy.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by DrDuke »

Controversial wrote: 17 Sep 2020, 08:38
DrDuke wrote: 16 Sep 2020, 18:08 Talking seriously, in this case size wasn't a much defining factor. Valuev was tracked very cautiously and still he was blowing his opportunities, he was awarded wins on several occasions.
His size made it difficult for opponents though, he didn't have much amateur experience and admitted himself he never liked the sport but was kind of forced into it because he was so big. So considering his lack of background and that he wasn't in great physical condition he done pretty well, all based on him being so huge and heavy.
Yeah, mediocre competitors weren't able to do anything because o his size, but that's why they were mediocre. Larry Donald, Chagaev and Haye schooled him confidently. Even completely shot Holyfield did enough to win only to get robbed. Ruiz also could be given decisions in both their fights, but Ruiz had just always been looking like sh!t.
Onamastus
Featherweight
Posts: 415
Joined: 13 Mar 2020, 14:44

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Onamastus »

Size obviously matters when you're a monster fighting opponents as weak as the vast majority of Valuev's opponents were. It's funny that 'the biggest heavyweight champion ever' could only beat cruisers Ruiz, Holyfield and Haye if the judges gifted him the decision. Add to that Larry Donald and Chagaev and literally every handy, half intelligent fighter he fought beat him.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »



52nd professional fight-December 2008
pound per pound
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1595
Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 14:36

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by pound per pound »

For such a huge man he was really too finesse. More of a boxer than a brawler.
Moderate ability. A top ten talent at best who via favorable promotions had a good career.

He ducked out of a chance to fight Vitaly Klitschko who would have pounded him.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

if Nikolai Valuev had fought the way Tyson Fury did in the second Wilder fight
( i.e using his huge size and mass to rough up against his opponent along with his superb boxing skills)
he would have retired undefeated.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by oogiebe »

Caractacus wrote: 27 Mar 2021, 11:56 if Nikolai Valuev had fought the way Tyson Fury did in the second Wilder fight
( i.e using his huge size and mass to rough up against his opponent along with his superb boxing skills)
he would have retired undefeated.
He wasn't capable of that.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by skanksta »

Caractacus wrote: 27 Mar 2021, 11:56 if Nikolai Valuev had fought the way Tyson Fury did in the second Wilder fight
( i.e using his huge size and mass to rough up against his opponent along with his superb boxing skills)
he would have retired undefeated.
That's daft because he simply couldn't do that. EVER.

It's amazing he was able to learn to box to a reasonable standard with his tragic medical condition. Have to mention it every time he's discussed - both his parents were 5' 6" !
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13871
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by DrDuke »

Caractacus wrote: 27 Mar 2021, 11:56 if Nikolai Valuev had fought the way Tyson Fury did in the second Wilder fight
( i.e using his huge size and mass to rough up against his opponent along with his superb boxing skills)
he would have retired undefeated.
He couldn't do that, he could only walk, throw jabs, right hands and one-twos, hug and take punches.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18500
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Evaluation of Nikolai Valuev's career

Post by Caractacus »

but just think if he had learned to use his 322 lbs of Titanic bulk to lean down on the necks of his opponents in close.
they'd all be on their knees by the 8th round.
Post Reply