coghaugen11 wrote: ↑04 Apr 2021, 23:55
And we know he was hurt every round because he was punched in the face.
But by your own (deeply flawed) logic, Watson allegedly won the 10th round because McCallum was hurt. As MT has already pointed out - if you lose rounds in boxing for being hurt, and you are claiming McCallum was hurt every round then ergo every round must be a Watson round.
Credit where credit is due, not everyone is able to create an entirely new way of scoring boxing matches just to avoid having to say they were completely wrong about something.
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 03:25
One guy won the round because he punched the other guy more than the other guy punched him.
Ok, so just to be clear, you are changing the goalposts for about the fourth time now and are saying it is not to do with being hurt any more, it is about who landed more?
If that is now the case and you are completely backtracking on your earlier stance, can you confirm that you believe the 10th was a clear Watson round because he punched McCallum more than McCallum punched him?
Come on, lads, were better than this. I fell into the trap last week when he started a thread on how good Wharton was.... now Watson. It just makes his obsession look better. It will be Dan Sherry next.
Eubank was beating Anthony Logan clearly (fair and square) at the Albert Hall on ITV. The same Logan who had just very, very nearly stopped top world contender Benn.
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34
Eubank was beating Anthony Logan clearly (fair and square) at the Albert Hall on ITV. The same Logan who had just very, very nearly stopped top world contender Benn.
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34
Eubank was beating Anthony Logan clearly (fair and square) at the Albert Hall on ITV. The same Logan who had just very, very nearly stopped top world contender Benn.
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:34
Eubank was beating Anthony Logan clearly (fair and square) at the Albert Hall on ITV. The same Logan who had just very, very nearly stopped top world contender Benn.
Was he main event?
Wasn’t pampered like a baby.
I’m going to leave it there. You obviously don’t have a clue about the 12st guys of that era and I think you need help.
mickey1975 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:21
Come on, lads, were better than this. I fell into the trap last week when he started a thread on how good Wharton was.... now Watson. It just makes his obsession look better. It will be Dan Sherry next.
coghaugen11 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:31
Wasn’t pampered like a baby.
I’m going to leave it there. You obviously don’t have a clue about the 12st guys of that era and I think you need help.
We both know the truth, Duff spoon fed him. Get over yourself. I doubt Wharton even knows who you are
Sorry, lads, shouldn’t rise to it. Just spoke to him Cog, he asked who you were, as you say you’re a former pro. If you think I’m lying, he also told me George Davey will be announced for a card for FW this afternoon.
mickey1975 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 04:21
Come on, lads, were better than this. I fell into the trap last week when he started a thread on how good Wharton was.... now Watson. It just makes his obsession look better. It will be Dan Sherry next.
mickey1975 wrote: ↑05 Apr 2021, 05:57
I’m going to leave it there. You obviously don’t have a clue about the 12st guys of that era and I think you need help.
We both know the truth, Duff spoon fed him. Get over yourself. I doubt Wharton even knows who you are
Does Chris know who you are? The man with the binoculars
