A lot of Fury fans will, if allowed. I dread to think how they’ll adapt to the culture!
Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 2020 OLD thread
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100749
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Arum Frustrated: Hearn 'Radio Silent' on Fury-Joshua Site Deal, Fury Might Fight Wilder Next!
A frustrated Top Rank chairman Bob Arum told BS on Monday that he would not be surprised if plans for the all-British undisputed heavyweight championship fight between Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua, in the works for late July or early August in Saudi Arabia, fall apart and that Fury next winds up facing former world titleholder Deontay Wilder for the third time.
“Maybe we’ll breathe some life into Wilder, and Fury will fight Wilder and Joshua will fight (WBO mandatory challenger Oleksandr) Usyk,” said Arum to Boxing Scene.
Arum said that he had been bullish on Fury-Joshua being finalized because Joshua promoter Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Boxing, Joshua's promoter, who has spearheaded the talks with a group from Saudi Arabia, promised that the site deal would be done last week.
But Arum said Hearn has gone “radio silent.”
“Eddie Hearn is busy trying to sell the London Bridge,” Arum said. “Let me tell you – last time I talked to Eddie was early last week and he said he was going to have a signed agreement from the Saudis in 24 hours. Well, he’s a little late. Wouldn’t you be pessimistic if you haven’t heard from him or anybody for a week? We’re the promoter with Frank (Warren) of Fury and we haven’t heard from Eddie in a week.”
Hearn has said he has secured a $150 million site fee from a group in Saudi Arabia that would pick one of three dates -- July 24, July 31 or Aug. 7 – to put the fight on at a site of their choice in the country. Arum said that he was told the likely site would be a new indoor stadium in Jeddah, although he is now not sure the deal will push through.
Arum has long been skeptical of offers from overseas, typically telling reporters when the topic is broached about a major fight that “I’m not packing my bags yet.” That is a reference to needing to make sure the offer and money are legitimate.
Asked about the offer to have Fury-Joshua in Saudi Arabia and if he was getting ready to pack his bags, last week he told Boxing Scene firmly said, “Yes.”
Asked again on Monday, Arum was singing a different tune.
“They’re not packed,” Arum said.
Warren has also been skeptical of Hearn’s ability to deliver the site deal, telling TalkSport in the United Kingdom, “Look, every day I’m being told -- it’s like, ‘It’s in the post.’ It’s not arrived and that’s where we are. I’ll believe it when I see it. We’re being told it’ll be here. I know Tyson’s had enough of hanging around. He wants to fight in June or July and that’s what will happen if this thing doesn’t get resolved very quickly.”
Arum said that while Hearn had sent him and Warren a contract outlining the terms of the site deal it was not binding.
“We got a document and they said it wasn’t binding. We said it has to be binding and we haven’t heard back from them. It says in (the paperwork) it this is not a binding agreement,” Arum said.
“Eddie sent me the draft but it was not a binding agreement and it was supposed to be turned into a binding agreement in 24 hours and Frank and I haven’t spoken to Eddie since. He’s gone radio silent.”
A group in Saudi Arabia did come up with around $60 million and built a temporary outdoor stadium in Diriyah to host Joshua’s rematch with Andy Ruiz Jr. in December 2019, when Joshua won a lopsided decision to reclaim the unified belts he had lost to Ruiz by upset seventh-round knockout in New York.
If there is no Fury-Joshua fight Wilder is the logical next opponent for Fury because Wilder and his team believe Fury still owes him a third fight stemming from their contract for their February 2020 rematch, which Fury won by seventh-round knockout to retain the lineal title and take Wilder’s WBC belt.
The deal for the rematch of their 2018 draw was a two-fight deal with the loser having the contractual right to a third fight. Wilder exercised his right but when the coronavirus pandemic shut down boxing for several months in 2020, the date by which the bout was supposed to take place expired.
Fury decided to move on to another fight but Wilder’s team believes Fury (30-0-1, 21 KOs), 32, still owes him the bout based injury and extension language, so he took Fury to mediation, which is what the rematch contract called for in the event of a dispute. The situation was not worked out in mediation and the next step, per the contract, was binding arbitration, which the sides are currently engaged in but with Fury’s team confident enough in their case that they have been making plans for the fight with Joshua (24-1, 22 KOs), 31, going so far as to sign a contract for the fight contingent on a satisfactory site agreement.
“The arbitration is going on but it’s just a waste of time and money,” Arum said.
A frustrated Top Rank chairman Bob Arum told BS on Monday that he would not be surprised if plans for the all-British undisputed heavyweight championship fight between Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua, in the works for late July or early August in Saudi Arabia, fall apart and that Fury next winds up facing former world titleholder Deontay Wilder for the third time.
“Maybe we’ll breathe some life into Wilder, and Fury will fight Wilder and Joshua will fight (WBO mandatory challenger Oleksandr) Usyk,” said Arum to Boxing Scene.
Arum said that he had been bullish on Fury-Joshua being finalized because Joshua promoter Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Boxing, Joshua's promoter, who has spearheaded the talks with a group from Saudi Arabia, promised that the site deal would be done last week.
But Arum said Hearn has gone “radio silent.”
“Eddie Hearn is busy trying to sell the London Bridge,” Arum said. “Let me tell you – last time I talked to Eddie was early last week and he said he was going to have a signed agreement from the Saudis in 24 hours. Well, he’s a little late. Wouldn’t you be pessimistic if you haven’t heard from him or anybody for a week? We’re the promoter with Frank (Warren) of Fury and we haven’t heard from Eddie in a week.”
Hearn has said he has secured a $150 million site fee from a group in Saudi Arabia that would pick one of three dates -- July 24, July 31 or Aug. 7 – to put the fight on at a site of their choice in the country. Arum said that he was told the likely site would be a new indoor stadium in Jeddah, although he is now not sure the deal will push through.
Arum has long been skeptical of offers from overseas, typically telling reporters when the topic is broached about a major fight that “I’m not packing my bags yet.” That is a reference to needing to make sure the offer and money are legitimate.
Asked about the offer to have Fury-Joshua in Saudi Arabia and if he was getting ready to pack his bags, last week he told Boxing Scene firmly said, “Yes.”
Asked again on Monday, Arum was singing a different tune.
“They’re not packed,” Arum said.
Warren has also been skeptical of Hearn’s ability to deliver the site deal, telling TalkSport in the United Kingdom, “Look, every day I’m being told -- it’s like, ‘It’s in the post.’ It’s not arrived and that’s where we are. I’ll believe it when I see it. We’re being told it’ll be here. I know Tyson’s had enough of hanging around. He wants to fight in June or July and that’s what will happen if this thing doesn’t get resolved very quickly.”
Arum said that while Hearn had sent him and Warren a contract outlining the terms of the site deal it was not binding.
“We got a document and they said it wasn’t binding. We said it has to be binding and we haven’t heard back from them. It says in (the paperwork) it this is not a binding agreement,” Arum said.
“Eddie sent me the draft but it was not a binding agreement and it was supposed to be turned into a binding agreement in 24 hours and Frank and I haven’t spoken to Eddie since. He’s gone radio silent.”
A group in Saudi Arabia did come up with around $60 million and built a temporary outdoor stadium in Diriyah to host Joshua’s rematch with Andy Ruiz Jr. in December 2019, when Joshua won a lopsided decision to reclaim the unified belts he had lost to Ruiz by upset seventh-round knockout in New York.
If there is no Fury-Joshua fight Wilder is the logical next opponent for Fury because Wilder and his team believe Fury still owes him a third fight stemming from their contract for their February 2020 rematch, which Fury won by seventh-round knockout to retain the lineal title and take Wilder’s WBC belt.
The deal for the rematch of their 2018 draw was a two-fight deal with the loser having the contractual right to a third fight. Wilder exercised his right but when the coronavirus pandemic shut down boxing for several months in 2020, the date by which the bout was supposed to take place expired.
Fury decided to move on to another fight but Wilder’s team believes Fury (30-0-1, 21 KOs), 32, still owes him the bout based injury and extension language, so he took Fury to mediation, which is what the rematch contract called for in the event of a dispute. The situation was not worked out in mediation and the next step, per the contract, was binding arbitration, which the sides are currently engaged in but with Fury’s team confident enough in their case that they have been making plans for the fight with Joshua (24-1, 22 KOs), 31, going so far as to sign a contract for the fight contingent on a satisfactory site agreement.
“The arbitration is going on but it’s just a waste of time and money,” Arum said.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100749
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Respect to Eddie, he seems to be the one doing all the work and thr rest are just sat on their ass, cus they can't deliver anything.
Frank has recently become the most useless promoter..
They probably think Hearn is always so eager, so why not let him do all the work.
Frank has recently become the most useless promoter..
They probably think Hearn is always so eager, so why not let him do all the work.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Hearn dropped a bollock overlooking McCracken's availability, and another one when he loaded a boat load of pressure on AJ and McCracken by saying it would get sorted because somebody was investing a fortune with the site fee.
I'd be staggered if AJ didn't kick off about that and suspect that is the likely reason things have gone a bit quiet.
I'd be staggered if AJ didn't kick off about that and suspect that is the likely reason things have gone a bit quiet.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Part of me thinks that the silence is a good thing but a larger part just thinks that maybe its not going to go ahead just yet.
Hearn is going to take a lot of flack if it doesnt come off, rightly or wrongly so. Then fact Tyson is in Vegas, suggests that they had the Wilder triolgy as a back up.
However, this is boxing. The drama is all part of it. It's probably all ready to announce after this weekends PPV.
Hearn is going to take a lot of flack if it doesnt come off, rightly or wrongly so. Then fact Tyson is in Vegas, suggests that they had the Wilder triolgy as a back up.
However, this is boxing. The drama is all part of it. It's probably all ready to announce after this weekends PPV.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
I don’t think there’s enough time now for a July fight.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Why? Unless they are dossing around they should only need a few weeks to fight. Ray Robinson often fought fortnightly.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
It’s not the Hearn show, why would they announce it on a Chisora card? BT, MTK, Arum and Wazza might want a say in that.dbf wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 07:54 Part of me thinks that the silence is a good thing but a larger part just thinks that maybe its not going to go ahead just yet.
Hearn is going to take a lot of flack if it doesnt come off, rightly or wrongly so. Then fact Tyson is in Vegas, suggests that they had the Wilder triolgy as a back up.
However, this is boxing. The drama is all part of it. It's probably all ready to announce after this weekends PPV.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Hearn doesn’t help himself at times. He’s too optimistic about things. The announcement’s been 2 weeks away for 3 months and he’s clearly over promised re: when the contract will be ready.
I was similar during my first graduate job, always eager with work and saying things would be done quickly when in reality all that caused was for me to being working 80 hour weeks to get them done in time. I always tell anyone now to ‘under promise, over deliver’ so at least then it reflects better on you personally.
It’s pretty clear he’s the only one doing anything with the deal but he shouldn’t be giving Bob/FW any ammunition to call him out on it.
I was similar during my first graduate job, always eager with work and saying things would be done quickly when in reality all that caused was for me to being working 80 hour weeks to get them done in time. I always tell anyone now to ‘under promise, over deliver’ so at least then it reflects better on you personally.
It’s pretty clear he’s the only one doing anything with the deal but he shouldn’t be giving Bob/FW any ammunition to call him out on it.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
I doubt that Robinson's opponents were calling for 12 weeks VADA testing.coghaugen11 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:24Why? Unless they are dossing around they should only need a few weeks to fight. Ray Robinson often fought fortnightly.
Last edited by BigDoofus on 27 Apr 2021, 08:49, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Like he promised the Josh Warrington unification fightmaverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:30 Hearn doesn’t help himself at times. He’s too optimistic about things. The announcement’s been 2 weeks away for 3 months and he’s clearly over promised re: when the contract will be ready.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
BigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:49Like he promised the Josh Warrington unification fightmaverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:30 Hearn doesn’t help himself at times. He’s too optimistic about things. The announcement’s been 2 weeks away for 3 months and he’s clearly over promised re: when the contract will be ready.![]()
Warrington was signed one month before a national lockdown whereby bringing a foreign fighter over was difficult and not having a crowd (c.20,000) would massively affect the financials.
Warrington won’t sell many PPVs so the £1-£2m of gate receipts would be needed to make it happen.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Sorry, I was saying the announcement will be next week, after the Chis-Parker PPV.mickey1975 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:27It’s not the Hearn show, why would they announce it on a Chisora card? BT, MTK, Arum and Wazza might want a say in that.dbf wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 07:54 Part of me thinks that the silence is a good thing but a larger part just thinks that maybe its not going to go ahead just yet.
Hearn is going to take a lot of flack if it doesnt come off, rightly or wrongly so. Then fact Tyson is in Vegas, suggests that they had the Wilder triolgy as a back up.
However, this is boxing. The drama is all part of it. It's probably all ready to announce after this weekends PPV.
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
It wouldn’t surprise me though with Eddie. ‘Tune in on PPV to see the biggest announcement in British boxing history.....only on PPV!’dbf wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 09:16Sorry, I was saying the announcement will be next week, after the Chis-Parker PPV.mickey1975 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:27It’s not the Hearn show, why would they announce it on a Chisora card? BT, MTK, Arum and Wazza might want a say in that.dbf wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 07:54 Part of me thinks that the silence is a good thing but a larger part just thinks that maybe its not going to go ahead just yet.
Hearn is going to take a lot of flack if it doesnt come off, rightly or wrongly so. Then fact Tyson is in Vegas, suggests that they had the Wilder triolgy as a back up.
However, this is boxing. The drama is all part of it. It's probably all ready to announce after this weekends PPV.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
How was it different? He was promising the unification fight earlier this year. The lockdown or the fact that Xu Can wasn't a World champion had no effect on Hearn's bolshy bluster.maverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 09:08BigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:49Like he promised the Josh Warrington unification fightmaverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 08:30 Hearn doesn’t help himself at times. He’s too optimistic about things. The announcement’s been 2 weeks away for 3 months and he’s clearly over promised re: when the contract will be ready.![]()
Completely different.
Warrington was signed one month before a national lockdown whereby bringing a foreign fighter over was difficult and not having a crowd (c.20,000) would massively affect the financials.
Warrington won’t sell many PPVs so the £1-£2m of gate receipts would be needed to make it happen.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100749
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
I think it's different..BigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 10:24How was it different? He was promising the unification fight earlier this year. The lockdown or the fact that Xu Can wasn't a World champion had no effect on Hearn's bolshy bluster.maverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 09:08Completely different.
Warrington was signed one month before a national lockdown whereby bringing a foreign fighter over was difficult and not having a crowd (c.20,000) would massively affect the financials.
Warrington won’t sell many PPVs so the £1-£2m of gate receipts would be needed to make it happen.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Beginning to think this doesn't happen, Fury walks away from boxing and Joshua fights Whyte
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22939
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Agreed. This is THE fight for both these lads. I'd be staggered if either fought anybody else in their next fight. This one is worth probably ten times more than any other for them.mickey1975 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 11:41Fury is going nowhere. In his absolute prime and enjoying his boxing.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
tbh i think a lot of ppl dont want the fight to happen, for the reason that it is somehow a victory for the 'machine'
look at the moaning about the location, crowd, etc.......it's like people dont even give a f@ck about the fight in the ring!
look at the moaning about the location, crowd, etc.......it's like people dont even give a f@ck about the fight in the ring!
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100749
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
What's the machine?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 12:07 tbh i think a lot of ppl dont want the fight to happen, for the reason that it is somehow a victory for the 'machine'
look at the moaning about the location, crowd, etc.......it's like people dont even give a f@ck about the fight in the ring!
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
How different is the "Saudi contract within 24 hours" to the Warrington - Xu Can unification?Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 10:27I think it's different..BigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 10:24How was it different? He was promising the unification fight earlier this year. The lockdown or the fact that Xu Can wasn't a World champion had no effect on Hearn's bolshy bluster.maverick23 wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 09:08
Completely different.
Warrington was signed one month before a national lockdown whereby bringing a foreign fighter over was difficult and not having a crowd (c.20,000) would massively affect the financials.
Warrington won’t sell many PPVs so the £1-£2m of gate receipts would be needed to make it happen.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
It was Xu who wanted to wait it out until crowds were there , like most he probably assumed that the Lara win was a certBigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 12:22How different is the "Saudi contract within 24 hours" to the Warrington - Xu Can unification?
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
So it would have been a unification without World champions?handsofstone wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 12:29It was Xu who wanted to wait it out until crowds were there , like most he probably assumed that the Lara win was a cert
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22985
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Anthony Joshua - 24 July 2021?
Eh? Warrington was still champ when it was supposed to happen and it was assumed by most that he would still be after he fought Lara, the Xu fight was apparantly happening in summerBigDoofus wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 12:32So it would have been a unification without World champions?handsofstone wrote: ↑27 Apr 2021, 12:29It was Xu who wanted to wait it out until crowds were there , like most he probably assumed that the Lara win was a cert