TOP TEN British wins ever:
-
forcefraser
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5455
- Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
Bruno v Chuck Gardner?
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
Turpin beating the previously almost invincible SRR.
Think Sugar Ray was 132-1 at the time of that loss..
Think Sugar Ray was 132-1 at the time of that loss..
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
You bastard mickey1975 !
I wanted to get there first with McCallum's win over Curry

I wanted to get there first with McCallum's win over Curry
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
And yes, Lewis was fully expected to beat a Tyson-worn Razor Ruddock, just not so early!
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
I rate AJ’s stoppage of WKlit over Fury’s decision. Both big though.
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
43 year olds who still possesed elite skillsets and had accumulated bags of championship experience. I think both Hopkins and Klitchsko were tougher to beat in their early forties than in their twenties and thirties, they both became better with age.
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
43 year olds who had fitness levels of men young enough to be their kids.
The age debate can be funny sometimes, Hopkins went through most of his career beating blokes a lot younger than him, but the moment he loses it's "oh well he's 40 odd" though being 40 odd was never a problem in all the fights he won.
The age debate can be funny sometimes, Hopkins went through most of his career beating blokes a lot younger than him, but the moment he loses it's "oh well he's 40 odd" though being 40 odd was never a problem in all the fights he won.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23088
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
I don't think Wlad was even 40 when Tyson beat him. Joe Joyce is 36 and considered a prospect.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
He wouldn’t be considered a prospect in 1981 or 1991mickey1975 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 04:46 I don't think Wlad was even 40 when Tyson beat him. Joe Joyce is 36 and considered a prospect.
He wouldn’t be anywhere
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
And I like big Joe, bless him.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23088
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
I don't recall any Olympic silver medallists in 80 or 88?coghaugen11 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 11:27He wouldn’t be considered a prospect in 1981 or 1991mickey1975 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 04:46 I don't think Wlad was even 40 when Tyson beat him. Joe Joyce is 36 and considered a prospect.
He wouldn’t be anywhere
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
Bowe was an olympic silver medalist in 1988
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
What criteria are we looking at here, though? To me, important factors are:
- winning in the other fighter's back yard
- winning when no-one gave the Brit much of a chance
- beating an apparently undefeatable champion / legend
- possibly getting off the floor to win
- winning by stoppage
On that basis:
Honeyghan-Curry must be up there - no-one was talking beforehand about Curry struggling at the weight - rather, he was going to choose to move up through the weights and reign at middleweight.
Laing-Duran - given Duran's status, one British reporter criticised the fight as he feared Laing might die. No one at all was picking him to win. The "Duran was out of shape" talk is pure hindsight, and ignores the fact that Duran was well over his championship weights for plenty of his non-title fights, and he had plenty of them. No-one had done to him what Laing did. Laing made people realise what was possible.
Stracey-Napoles - people can argue that Napoles was fading, but Stracey still did it overseas, by stoppage, dragging himself off the floor in round 1.
Turpin-Robinson I is also clearly up there given Robinson's status at the time. Had Turpin won the rematch in the US, that would have been the undoubted no. 1. Much as Terry Downes was a great fighter, his win was over a much more shopworn Robinson.
Fury-Klitschko and Fury-Wilder II plainly both rank very highly too. To me, the second Wilder fight is Fury's best given the manner of the performance.
Oddly, given that I like Lennox Lewis as a person and a human being, I find it hard to assess his wins in the US because it sort of feels like he's partly North American so it's not so much of an against-the-odds, crossing-the-pond away fixture for him but a bit of a trip down the road.
Several of Froch's wins would definitely make a British top 40, but hard to see one in the top 10. Ditto with Calzaghe.
- winning in the other fighter's back yard
- winning when no-one gave the Brit much of a chance
- beating an apparently undefeatable champion / legend
- possibly getting off the floor to win
- winning by stoppage
On that basis:
Honeyghan-Curry must be up there - no-one was talking beforehand about Curry struggling at the weight - rather, he was going to choose to move up through the weights and reign at middleweight.
Laing-Duran - given Duran's status, one British reporter criticised the fight as he feared Laing might die. No one at all was picking him to win. The "Duran was out of shape" talk is pure hindsight, and ignores the fact that Duran was well over his championship weights for plenty of his non-title fights, and he had plenty of them. No-one had done to him what Laing did. Laing made people realise what was possible.
Stracey-Napoles - people can argue that Napoles was fading, but Stracey still did it overseas, by stoppage, dragging himself off the floor in round 1.
Turpin-Robinson I is also clearly up there given Robinson's status at the time. Had Turpin won the rematch in the US, that would have been the undoubted no. 1. Much as Terry Downes was a great fighter, his win was over a much more shopworn Robinson.
Fury-Klitschko and Fury-Wilder II plainly both rank very highly too. To me, the second Wilder fight is Fury's best given the manner of the performance.
Oddly, given that I like Lennox Lewis as a person and a human being, I find it hard to assess his wins in the US because it sort of feels like he's partly North American so it's not so much of an against-the-odds, crossing-the-pond away fixture for him but a bit of a trip down the road.
Several of Froch's wins would definitely make a British top 40, but hard to see one in the top 10. Ditto with Calzaghe.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
They had all turned pro 15 years prior. Dimlow.mickey1975 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 11:46I don't recall any Olympic silver medallists in 80 or 88?coghaugen11 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 11:27He wouldn’t be considered a prospect in 1981 or 1991mickey1975 wrote: ↑26 May 2021, 04:46 I don't think Wlad was even 40 when Tyson beat him. Joe Joyce is 36 and considered a prospect.
He wouldn’t be anywhere
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
And 80 Games were boycotted. A 20 year old Bowe won silver. Not that that’s pro boxing - a completely seperate sport.
-
coghaugen11
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2595
- Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59
Re: TOP TEN British wins ever:
Think what Tyrell Biggs would’ve done if he stayed am another 10-12 years - nobody would fornicating touch him 