1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post Reply
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6071
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by goose 5 »

Who would have won in 1972 ?
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by DrDuke »

The same as a year ago.
f read
Featherweight
Posts: 556
Joined: 28 Mar 2020, 15:51

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by f read »

Ali by 1972 was far superior to Joe Frazier. The March 8 1971 Frazier was not to be denied. However something was taken out of him after that fight. He was never the same and that was the shining moment of his career. Ali had a wonderful 1972 fighting many times and looking to be in championship form throughout the year. He wins a decision over a more declining Frazier at this time.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15130
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Yeah. Ali was never again as good as he was in his prime, but he had got rid of more of the ring rust by 1972. His stamina was better and he would be giving Frazier so many rounds like he did in the first fight.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15668
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by elmersalsa »

By 1972, the great Smokin' Joe was totally flat. No more fire. No more intensity. He had the aggressiveness, but not with the same fire. That FOTC with the great Muhammad Ali took a lot out of him.

Meanwhile in 1972, Ali was having one of the best years of his career whupping for the second time George Chuvalo, Jerry Quarry and Floyd Patterson. He also that year beat Mac Foster and the great Bob Foster for the NABF Heavyweight title.


Ali wins this pretty easy. By decision.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by DrDuke »

Both Ali and Frazier took a lot of each other in every their bout, especially in the 1st and the 3rd.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15130
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Joe.Kelly wrote: 17 May 2021, 12:13
Ambling Alp II wrote: 16 May 2021, 19:31 Yeah. Ali was never again as good as he was in his prime, but he had got rid of more of the ring rust by 1972. His stamina was better and he would be giving Frazier so many rounds like he did in the first fight.
The match that ruined Ali was Superfight III, which took place in 1975. Muhammad was never the same after that war.
Agree that he was never the same after that fight. He was getting older, but it certainly accelerated his decline. It was incredible how much punishment Ali and Frazier dealt out against each other in the 3rd fight. Phenomenal performance by both guys. Had they been 25, they would still have gone on to more great things after this.

Makes you think about a lot what ifs. What if the third fight never happened? Ali would probably had a couple more years of great performances.
What if it was a normal era and Frazier did not have to deal with Ali and Foreman? He could have been great for several more years, probably until at least the late 1970s.
Ali, Frazier, and Foreman all probably shortened each other's careers. But of course they gave some great fights.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39231
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by margaret thatcher »

george didnt have much trouble with smokin joe did he
f read
Featherweight
Posts: 556
Joined: 28 Mar 2020, 15:51

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by f read »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 17 May 2021, 15:28
Joe.Kelly wrote: 17 May 2021, 12:13
Ambling Alp II wrote: 16 May 2021, 19:31 Yeah. Ali was never again as good as he was in his prime, but he had got rid of more of the ring rust by 1972. His stamina was better and he would be giving Frazier so many rounds like he did in the first fight.
The match that ruined Ali was Superfight III, which took place in 1975. Muhammad was never the same after that war.
Agree that he was never the same after that fight. He was getting older, but it certainly accelerated his decline. It was incredible how much punishment Ali and Frazier dealt out against each other in the 3rd fight. Phenomenal performance by both guys. Had they been 25, they would still have gone on to more great things after this.

Makes you think about a lot what ifs. What if the third fight never happened? Ali would probably had a couple more years of great performances.
What if it was a normal era and Frazier did not have to deal with Ali and Foreman? He could have been great for several more years, probably until at least the late 1970s.
Ali, Frazier, and Foreman all probably shortened each other's careers. But of course they gave some great fights.
Agreed that fight ruined Ali. The Inoki debacle also did great damage. He had blood clots in his legs and was even hospitalized for a short time.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5853
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by p4p1 »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 17 May 2021, 15:28
Joe.Kelly wrote: 17 May 2021, 12:13
Ambling Alp II wrote: 16 May 2021, 19:31 Yeah. Ali was never again as good as he was in his prime, but he had got rid of more of the ring rust by 1972. His stamina was better and he would be giving Frazier so many rounds like he did in the first fight.
The match that ruined Ali was Superfight III, which took place in 1975. Muhammad was never the same after that war.
Agree that he was never the same after that fight. He was getting older, but it certainly accelerated his decline. It was incredible how much punishment Ali and Frazier dealt out against each other in the 3rd fight. Phenomenal performance by both guys. Had they been 25, they would still have gone on to more great things after this.

Makes you think about a lot what ifs. What if the third fight never happened? Ali would probably had a couple more years of great performances.
What if it was a normal era and Frazier did not have to deal with Ali and Foreman? He could have been great for several more years, probably until at least the late 1970s.
Ali, Frazier, and Foreman all probably shortened each other's careers. But of course they gave some great fights.
I just read a Frazier biography by Karm Jnr and interestingly both Durham and Futch felt that Joe wouldn't have a long shelf life due to his style. Hence why he was only fighting twice a year during an era where most guys fought much more often.

With Ali's decline after the fight, I wouldn't discount the effects of his Parkinson's either. TBE's do increase the likelihood of Parkinson's later in life so I wouldn't be surprised if brain trauma sped up the onset of Parkinson's either. Interestingly reduced or stiff movement in your legs is also an early symptom of PD. I understand that almost 4 years is a long time out of the ring and out of training, I also understand that he had a very short camp before the Quarry fight and all his fights during that period we rushed because at the time no one knew if Ali would go to jail or not but the decline in his movement just seems like it was more than just a lay off to me.

From the small parts I have read about the disease, in young people and it's probably worse in athletes especially, doctors often put early symptoms such as stiffness down to sports injury or early arthritis due to sports etc.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7142
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by Nile4000 »

Ali probably wins a decision, buuuuuuut.......knowing that it's Muhammad will probably inspire Joe to put up a strong performance, at least it would be competitive.
irongloves
Lightweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 22 Jan 2018, 22:19

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by irongloves »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 17 May 2021, 15:28
Joe.Kelly wrote: 17 May 2021, 12:13
Ambling Alp II wrote: 16 May 2021, 19:31 Yeah. Ali was never again as good as he was in his prime, but he had got rid of more of the ring rust by 1972. His stamina was better and he would be giving Frazier so many rounds like he did in the first fight.
The match that ruined Ali was Superfight III, which took place in 1975. Muhammad was never the same after that war.
Agree that he was never the same after that fight. He was getting older, but it certainly accelerated his decline. It was incredible how much punishment Ali and Frazier dealt out against each other in the 3rd fight. Phenomenal performance by both guys. Had they been 25, they would still have gone on to more great things after this.

Makes you think about a lot what ifs. What if the third fight never happened? Ali would probably had a couple more years of great performances.
What if it was a normal era and Frazier did not have to deal with Ali and Foreman? He could have been great for several more years, probably until at least the late 1970s.
Ali, Frazier, and Foreman all probably shortened each other's careers. But of course they gave some great fights.
As Ferdie Pacheco said after Manila, both should have walked away.

In 72, just akin to fight 2. Ali had more left after FOTC despite his loss.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46324
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: 1972: Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier

Post by gilgamesh »

I'd have to favor Ali, but I feel like it would've been more competitive than it was in their actual 2nd fight at this time.
Post Reply