Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Enlightened-One »

Bob Arum: “We’re not paying Wilder to step aside. It’s better to get rid of him and go about our business. We can make the Fury-Joshua fight for November or December.”

Thoughts? :confused:
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5900
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by joshj909 »

Would probably be a Fury decision this time. Wilder will be more tentative and try using new techniques he's recently learnt such as the jab. Wont do as many PPV buys as nobody cares.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Enlightened-One »

A fight that no one wants to see, other than Wilder fans and the lawyers that were paid handsomely to gain the arbitration verdict.

Wilder loses and retires.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 18 May 2021, 09:14, edited 1 time in total.
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Noxy »

It’s become boring. No fight is worth so much blah blah.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Getting paid off would be a perfect spot for wilder, get money without getting beat up again, talk about no brainer. Put up just enough protest to retain some dignity.
ironbeard
Super Featherweight
Posts: 17189
Joined: 15 Sep 2018, 20:00

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by ironbeard »

I think Bob is trolling for AJ money to payoff Wilder with.
IRONFIST
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5922
Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 09:25

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by IRONFIST »

Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.
bobcatbox
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1446
Joined: 28 Jun 2020, 12:51

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by bobcatbox »

This is one way to call Wilder’s bluff and make him take a smaller payout. Basically says “alright come fight us ASAP” if you’re really in shape. Smart move by Uncle Bob.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5711
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2094
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by squiggy »

Utterly stupid situation
snake33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 351
Joined: 12 Dec 2004, 07:31

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by snake33 »

Wilder is ruined mentally. This will be his last fight, for now.
He should have been on his second interim fight
by now, with his confidence renewed and a shot
at winning. Instead he sat around and whined,
fired his coaching staff and hired a new scape
goat. He'll retire and make a bad come back in
a year or so when he burns through his money.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Enlightened-One »

IRONFIST wrote: 18 May 2021, 10:00 Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.
It seems that Fury is legally-obliged to face Wilder, unless the Brit pays-off the American.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Enlightened-One »

The only good thing to come out of the arbitration situation is Wilder’s imminent retirement (when he suffers a third Fury loss) and potentially Usyk hanging up his gloves too.

Not that I dislike Usyk, but he’s not big enough to compete at heavyweight. He’s also injury prone and struggled badly against a fringe contender, which suggests he may already be past-his-prime.

So Usyk may as well be highly-rewarded for losing to Joshua, before hanging up his gloves to enjoy the fruits of his illustrious career.

The top-ten rated heavyweight rankings has become stale and needs fresh blood.
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by cormack »

same outcome anyway

wilders not a threat
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101104
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Enlightened-One wrote: 18 May 2021, 13:21
IRONFIST wrote: 18 May 2021, 10:00 Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.
It seems that Fury is legally-obliged to face Wilder, unless the Brit pays-off the American.
Scott14833
Lightweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 28 Jan 2018, 15:28

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Scott14833 »

I don't think I'll stay up till 5am to watch this one....
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by maverick23 »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by H8Usernames »

I think that this is perfect both for Fury and Joshua. A legitimate reason to postpone their fight and to build up some more hype around it. Big question is how can that be done?

AJ will need a fight in the meantime. Who should he have a go at while waiting? It's kinda problematic how few hype producing fights there are out there for AJ. A Ruiz III bout in Mexico city would do wonders but also carry enormous risk.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46304
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by gilgamesh »

It's not a bad thing really if they're actually able to get Fury vs Joshua done before years end. Or hell even Wilder vs Joshua if something unexpected should happen.

It'll probably be a little more competitive than the 2nd bout, but only because Fury will be a little more careful with a big megafight looming on the horizon.
The Gratest
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6495
Joined: 20 Jun 2020, 19:41

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by The Gratest »

If Wilder gets the weight of his ring walk costume right then hell, anything can happen!

Monzon83
Lightweight
Posts: 741
Joined: 13 May 2018, 21:03

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Monzon83 »

If these 2 keep fighting each other it's not impossible that Wilder eventually lands one of those hail mary right hands and gets a KO. He nearly did in the first fight, which people forget.

Then what? We get Wilder-Fury part 4.

I would not be surprised if that happens.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5711
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

maverick23 wrote: 18 May 2021, 14:15
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.
The networks pay for the tv advertising and they surely made money.

Top rank and haymon lost money because of ridiculous guarantees. I would assume a 3rd fight has guranteed money too - let me check the court filings
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by margaret thatcher »

Monzon83 wrote: 18 May 2021, 18:26 If these 2 keep fighting each other it's not impossible that Wilder eventually lands one of those hail mary right hands and gets a KO. He nearly did in the first fight, which people forget.

Then what? We get Wilder-Fury part 4.

I would not be surprised if that happens.
lol, wilder-fury 4, with a rematch clause for the loser :lol:
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by DrDuke »

Probably team Wilder is just b!tching for the bigger step aside check.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Post by maverick23 »

Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 20:50
maverick23 wrote: 18 May 2021, 14:15
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.
The networks pay for the tv advertising and they surely made money.

Top rank and haymon lost money because of ridiculous guarantees. I would assume a 3rd fight has guranteed money too - let me check the court filings
The networks dedicated loads of ad space for pushing the fight. In the end the money they would have received from the fight would have been less than they would have received if they’d just sold the airtime to normal advertisers.

I’d be surprised if Bob/Al lost money but who knows. May explain why they were so against staging the fight with minimal fans.
Post Reply