H8Usernames wrote: ↑18 May 2021, 16:03
candyslim wrote: ↑17 May 2021, 03:28
Of course Joshua was the 'A' side. He is the money man who has raised purses across the division. Most if not all of his opponents had their career high payday against Joshua. The only reason he has agreed 50/50 this time despite holding 75 or 80% of the belts is that he desperately wants the fight.
Hearn claimed he made offers to both. I can't prove he made offers to Fury, but it is well documented that Wilder declined. If there were any truth in your claim that Joshua didn't want to fight Fury, it would have been because Fury had no belt to offer. Now that Fury has a belt, Joshua has switched focus. He's always been consistent, it's about being undisputed champion.
Does Wilder have a following of female admirers? I thought it was only boxing fans, and a proportion of US Sports fans, who even know who he is. Fury demonstrated that by asking Americans passing by in the street.
Wilder is not a great warrior, he will always take the path of least resistance. He had no intention of fighting Dillian Whyte never mind Klitschko. His best win is over a man with a heart condition who was cherry picked as being the best option in terms of risk/ reward on account of his impressive KO of fringe-contender Bryant Jennings. What else has Ortiz done, remind me?
The first Fury fight was another cherry pick. Wilder's resume consisted of fringe-contenders, mainly top 20 rather than top 10 in the world, and it was crying out for another respectable name. Who better than a former world champion, conqueror of the mighty Klitschko, who looked then like he hadn't moved from the couch in years? I was furious with Fury for taking the fight I thought he was nowhere near being ready. Of course if he had looked ready he'd never have been offered the fight.
The only fight Wilder ever had against an elite heavyweight in peak condition, was the Fury rematch, and Fury wiped the floor with him. The "Great Warrior" has been crying about it ever since.
Tyson Fury is the lineal champion. The ABC's are worthless. This is a champion vs challenger type of fight. Fury holds 100% of the championship.
cs: Seriously? The man has never made a title defence 6 years after winning the title for the first time. Twice he has failed to do so despite having a signed contractual commitment.
"Hearn made offers to Fury pre Fury vs Wilder I" show me some links or stop making that claim.
cs: If you think I'm going to waste more of my time researching something I've already conceded I can't prove, in order to prove something to someone who will simply ignore it and probably make some inane comment about my sex-life instead, then you're going to be disappointed.
What on earth is this with "following of female admirers"? Have you never gotten laid or what? Is this something to be jealous of? I don't get it.
cs: I asked you if your hatred of Joshua was based on jealousy. Lacking imagination, you turned the question back on me so I was simply pointing out that the question doesn't apply in Wilder's case as far as I can tell. The argument is beyond you so you hit out with some childish insult.
Wilder is a great Warrior. We are talking about a cruiserweight here that held a hw title for some time and was the only man brave enough to fight Tyson Fury. Everyone with a brain always knew that he was basically a fraud but he like most others was in the game for himself and probably his family and look at all that he achieved. Also I wouldn't put it past Wilder to beat AJ if that fight ever gets made.
cs: He held the title for so long because his management team made damn sure he wasn't going to fight anyone dangerous. Yes he was basically a cruiserweight but he was blessed with prodigious power which was ample compensation. You think he is a fraud? So WTF are we arguing about?
Please don't talk about his bravery in taking on Fury, not in the first fight anyway. His team saw Fury as a great name to boost Deontay's resume and a guy who was in no condition to offer much of a threat. Sure there was an element of risk like there was with Ortiz, but he couldn't continue beating up people like Szpilka and Washington who had no business being in a world title fight, it was becoming embarrassing and even his admirers were beginning to ask questions.
To be honest I kinda believe that Fury did cheat in the rematch but I don't think that he would have needed to in order to win. I don't think that criticizing a man who was cheated against is in order just cause that man complained about the matter.
cs: You think Fury cheated because Wilder said he did? There is no evidence of any wrongdoing by Fury and you are embarrassing yourself by giving credence to someone who does not have the strength of character to accept his defeat like a man, and who hits out in blind spite at the man who truly cared about him, and saved him from possible permanent injury.