Whats he doing now?
weight bullies
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13416
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: weight bullies
Throwing crisps.JamesPhilips wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 16:57Whats he doing now?
Re: weight bullies
Never heard this term before. You either make weight, or you don't.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: weight bullies
duh 
no idea why some people seem to think that 'you either make weight or dont' is incompatible with the question
has anyone suggested that there is some 3rd realm between making weight and not making weight?
no idea why some people seem to think that 'you either make weight or dont' is incompatible with the question
has anyone suggested that there is some 3rd realm between making weight and not making weight?
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3372
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: weight bullies
Is it something that people think should be frowned upon ? For me, regardless of what access they have to sports science and nutrition it must take a huge amount of dedication and sacrifice for fighters to boil down to way below their walk around weight so surely they’ve earned any weight bully advantage on fight night ?
Re: weight bullies
I am telling you that it isn't a thing. I am not debating it. I am telling you something.Cyclops wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 16:38I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.
Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.
You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.
Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.
But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
Re: weight bullies
No, it's isn't incompatible with the question. Weight cutting has been part of the sport for generations but is more prevalent now due to sports science. If you want to get to a decent level, you need to cut weight.
-
watsupdoc87
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16
Re: weight bullies
If you are comfortable at the weight you are fighting at the wrong weight
Re: weight bullies
You're 'telling' me a load of old bollocks.emallini wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 17:12I am telling you that it isn't a thing. I am not debating it. I am telling you something.Cyclops wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 16:38I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.
Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.
You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.
Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.
But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
Re: weight bullies
And some people are more 'comfortable' at cutting weight than others. It's a cliche, but MMA has a HUGE problem with guys (and gals) cutting weight. I don't follow it particularly, but didn't they only ban IV rehydration in the past couple of years? Or are they still allowed to do it?
Re: weight bullies
Weight cutting was previously purely a natural talent like having fast hands or a good chin.
More recently it’s been taken advantage of by those who have the best access to PEDs etc
In its purest form it’s not cheating ... no more “bully” than calling someone who hits harder than an opponent a bully .. it’s just unfair :)
Having said that I would much prefer the middleweight championship to be contested by two 160lb guys like it used to be. Not a 180lb guy and a 170lb guy
More recently it’s been taken advantage of by those who have the best access to PEDs etc
In its purest form it’s not cheating ... no more “bully” than calling someone who hits harder than an opponent a bully .. it’s just unfair :)
Having said that I would much prefer the middleweight championship to be contested by two 160lb guys like it used to be. Not a 180lb guy and a 170lb guy
Re: weight bullies
I think people's issues with it are that, in some examples, if somebody comes in with a clear weight advantage despite weighing in the same as the opponent it might be possible evidence of some sort of cheating.
That's why there's still an ongoing argument amongst some people that we should return to same day weigh-ins.
I'd be up for that, so long as people could prove they weren't dehydrated to the point of it being dangerous on fight night just to make the weight. We all know that they gave them a day to re-hydrate after the weigh in to make it safer, but if you think that nobody has ever exploited that 24 hour rule then we've got a very naive person on our hands.
Re: weight bullies
The answer is not a lot, he does have a match with the ghost of Barrera.watsupdoc87 wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 17:23Is he still going? I ain't heard a peep from him in a couple years![]()
A perfect opponent seeing as Hart just beat him and Zurdo beat Hart twice
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103147
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: weight bullies
Bellew was a domestic weight billy at 175.. had two world title shots and lost.. then moved up to his true weight class CW. I would have loved to see him fighting Drozd for the WBC belt and not vacant. We’ll see if he would have won the belt then.
Also, paid Briedis step aside and had him fight Valilly on the Bellew-Flores undercard, then vacated afterwards.
Also, paid Briedis step aside and had him fight Valilly on the Bellew-Flores undercard, then vacated afterwards.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: weight bullies
its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger
on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too
now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too
now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
Re: weight bullies
I can't be bothered to check, but was there much of a weight discrepancy when Briedis brutally knocked Charr into next week?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 20:02 its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger
on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too
now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: weight bullies
cant be bothered either, but prob about 50 pounds id think
cracking ko too, the shot looked so effortless and like briedis put nothing into it, but big manny sure went to sleep
cracking ko too, the shot looked so effortless and like briedis put nothing into it, but big manny sure went to sleep
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9188
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: weight bullies
31 lb. 245 and 214.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 20:42 cant be bothered either, but prob about 50 pounds id think
cracking ko too, the shot looked so effortless and like briedis put nothing into it, but big manny sure went to sleep
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39335
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: weight bullies
ah, okay, not as much as i'd thought
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: weight bullies
Cyclops wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 16:38I make you completely wrong. In a normal gym that puts it's fighters into competition they can't afford all the 'scientific methods' that fighters backed with more money can afford, so they genuinely do have to fight at their natural weight. If you have the right team of 'nutritionists' and 'strength and conditioning coaches' behind you, you can hop on the scales and weigh in exactly the same weight as your opponent: and then in 24 hours the two fighters can come in with an obvious weight disparity.
Below heavyweight, it's a science getting the biggest possible athlete to come in at the lightest possible weight. And drained fighters are often attempted weight bullies that screw up their cut, or are fighters that are just too big for the contracted weight but weaken themselves to make it anyway, often in the knowledge that they will lose, just for the payday.
You're right, in the gyms I trained in, and in amateur and area level gyms you didn't get 'weight bullies' because we fought close to our walk around weight.
Your argument about 'internet fans' is pretty lame. I've not competed personally, but never really stuck around boxing gyms for very long (I trained in a am gym when I was younger and the trainers decided that I wasn't worth their time, as they had dedicated traveller kids who could really fight that they devoted their time to) but when I trained in kickboxing and Muay Thai gyms, where we had champions (and I'm friends with one of the best K1 fighters in the UK), of course weight bullying wasn't a thing.
But with millions and millions of dollars at stake, anybody with eyes can see that weight bullies exist. Sod off with your "oh, I've been in a gym, you're just typing" bollocks. You sound dismissive and frankly a twat.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: weight bullies
my guess is that a genetic predisposition (or not) for cutting weight, is secondary to the scientific knowledge/ whatever cheats they use. IE having the right team in place (with all that entails) a bigger factor than genetics, though i stand to be corrected on thatmargaret thatcher wrote: ↑07 Jun 2021, 20:02 its very interesting, cuz i totally see why it has an unfair vibe to it. we have weight divisions and rate guys p4p to eliminate the size factor. we value often those abilities that take so much application and practice to craft properly. and no one says that manuel charr is better than tank davis or inoue etc, even though he would beat their asses simply cuz he's bigger
on the other hand, is having the right genetics to be able to drain a ton of weight, any more unfair than having the genetics that make you a way bigger puncher than the other guys? that is a bit unfair too isnt it, wasnt something your or the others had a choice over. and getting weight right can take lots of dedication too
now, let's say your an a-side fighter, and you blow the weight, but then payoff the other guy either to take the fight anyway or for the limit to be upped, that's not any genetic gift or dedication
Re: weight bullies
Always been a fan of the idea of having a weigh in 24hrs before with a weigh in on fight day with a determined allowed increase… say 2/3kg max.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6560
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: weight bullies
I wonder if that rule would result in a lot of last minute fight cancellations however? Or it could mean fighters won't be able to rehydrate properly.