Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
Posturing. Teo didn't aggressively seek out the boogeyman, beat him, because he fears a rematch. Y'all are silly.
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
Initially I was happy about the Lopez win, I didn't care to see a rematch either. Ever since that win Teofimo and his father have been damn near unbearable. Can't stand their delusional claims on how Teofimo is this big money making machine, the top star in the sport and all this other BS. Sick of these guys man, can't stand them.
Not a huge fan of Loma either, but at this point I'm pulling for the rematch. Even though I'm not confident Loma beats him, I seen glimpses in the first fight where Teo had no answers for Lomas offense. I would love to see Loma completely dismantle Teo for 12 rounds now.
Not a huge fan of Loma either, but at this point I'm pulling for the rematch. Even though I'm not confident Loma beats him, I seen glimpses in the first fight where Teo had no answers for Lomas offense. I would love to see Loma completely dismantle Teo for 12 rounds now.
-
apollo creed
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 7254
- Joined: 18 Aug 2014, 12:28
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
Teo deep inside him knows that Loma wasn't at his best but it is what it is. As I said before, it was a big mistake from Loma to not have a rematch clause in the contract.NateJR wrote: ↑03 Jul 2021, 07:52 Initially I was happy about the Lopez win, I didn't care to see a rematch either. Ever since that win Teofimo and his father have been damn near unbearable. Can't stand their delusional claims on how Teofimo is this big money making machine, the top star in the sport and all this other BS. Sick of these guys man, can't stand them.
Not a huge fan of Loma either, but at this point I'm pulling for the rematch. Even though I'm not confident Loma beats him, I seen glimpses in the first fight where Teo had no answers for Lomas offense. I would love to see Loma completely dismantle Teo for 12 rounds now.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39230
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
teo beat loma 8-4 at 23, he's more likely the one to be getting better, not the injury prone 33 year old
i do agree loma could improve the approach he takes, but i dont think teo fought a once in a life perfect fight either
i do agree loma could improve the approach he takes, but i dont think teo fought a once in a life perfect fight either
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9153
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
True, but loma won the rounds he threw punches in 4-2. so surely that will give him the confedence to throw punches. as iv said befor, zero clue why loma froze up for 6 rounds but if he can learn from it...margaret thatcher wrote: ↑04 Jul 2021, 03:46 teo beat loma 8-4 at 23, he's more likely the one to be getting better, not the injury prone 33 year old
i do agree loma could improve the approach he takes, but i dont think teo fought a once in a life perfect fight either
-
Onetimeonly
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 11584
- Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28
Re: Teofimo Management wants Loma to agree to stipulations for rematch
He froze up because missiles were missing him by inches. Teo is a fantastic counter puncher.gregregegg wrote: ↑04 Jul 2021, 04:37True, but loma won the rounds he threw punches in 4-2. so surely that will give him the confedence to throw punches. as iv said befor, zero clue why loma froze up for 6 rounds but if he can learn from it...margaret thatcher wrote: ↑04 Jul 2021, 03:46 teo beat loma 8-4 at 23, he's more likely the one to be getting better, not the injury prone 33 year old
i do agree loma could improve the approach he takes, but i dont think teo fought a once in a life perfect fight either