Cyclops wrote: ↑26 Jul 2021, 05:04
Wales wrote: ↑25 Jul 2021, 23:45
Cyclops wrote: ↑25 Jul 2021, 15:46
He wasn't throwing back and was getting battered. How many unanswered punches were there? It was double figures. I think it was a good stoppage.
Fun fight by the way!
It’s one of them where it looks good from one perspective, but can fully understand Takam being fuming about it too.
If I was Takam I’d be thinking Boxing isn’t a tickling contest. I was Ahead on the cards. Probably my last chance to get one more big fight. Ive not gone down or looked seriously hurt. Sketchy as fornicate on my feet, yes, but not out the game.
Takam would’ve been better off taking a knee and an 8 count in hindsight
He did look hurt though, and you can't get hit in the head that many times and not throw back. He knows that. I saw an interview with Chisora where he said the stoppage was shit and Takam should have been given a standing out 8 count. As far as I was aware standing 8 counts didn't exist anymore. Chisora's benefitted from some much dodgier stoppages. However, despite saying BT couldn't afford him, he knows he's the ideal opponent for Joyce next to finally help him cross over, but will want to to be suitably paid for it.
Takam is doing the right thing: he gave Joyce all he could handle, which any sensible boxing fan thought he would, and he didn't end up dead on the canvas, so of course he should and will protest it. But it was a good stoppage.
I know exactly where you’re coming from. And I understand the “didn’t end up dead on the canvas” theology, albeit incredibly extreme, especially as Joyce wasn’t unleashing on him with that level of venom and accuracy. Putting all of that to one side. As a fighter you’ve trained your whole life to fight with a goal of being reaching the pinnacle of the sport. You get in the ring to give it your all, and sometimes, some fighters, have to come through incredible adversity to win. Corrales Castillo, Joshua Wladamir, moorer cooper - the list in endless (not literally)
Now, the referee decided on Saturday to stop the fight.! Takam wasn’t so hurt he went down, or couldn’t take any more. He didn’t choose to end the fight. Takams corner didn’t throw in the towel - so those closest to him didn’t decide to end the fight: Takam was stopped by a referee who made a decision on opinion, not fact, to end the fight. A decision that overruled both the fighter and his corner. A stoppage that was premature compared to other fights we’ve seen. A stoppage made against the fighter who was ahead on the cards. As a fighter you step into the ring accepting the risk of injury. Sometimes it’s a broken jaw, unfortunately sometimes it can be life changing, nobody wants to see a fighter hurt permanently. However, if we start stopping fights as soon as someone gets on top we may as well pack it in and go home.
Example - how was Takam stopped on Saturday but Lacy wasn’t against Calzaghe . Takam hadnt suffered a sustained beating. He basically was having a bad minute or two. Would he have survived, well never know.
Lacy got leathered from pillar to post for 36 minutes.
Where is the consistency?
There isnt any.
Why?
Because when refs start stopping fights at first sign of trouble, before the fighter or the corner do, whilst others allow Lacy like beatings, it results in the goal posts being moved fight by fight .
Nobody wants to see a fighter get permanent damage. But let’s have it right. If the ref hadn’t jumped in Takam would either have wilted or recoverd. And as a professional fighter that is the risk they take, accept and are willing to go through to reach the pinacle .