Ringcard girls

peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

Ringcard girls appear to be banned at the moment due to Covid regulations

With how PC the broadcasters have become, will they make a comeback to the ring and if so when.

I noticed the hazmat suit guys cleaning the ring after every fight on recent shows which seems overkill now?
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

They should do like they did in WCW back in the day :lol: just have the girls on a stage or catwalk away from the ring. Sad innit? Just how many jobs are affected by over-regulation.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32932
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Opened this thread expecting to see some pics, huge disappointment.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2027
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Frostieballs »

I think Eddie had already dropped them?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

eddeh is hiring them as boxers these days
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103145
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Frostieballs wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 09:40 I think Eddie had already dropped them?
Yeh, the big promoters in the UK have dropped them.

If a woman wants to be a ringcard girl flippin let them.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103145
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

HomicideHenry wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 08:19 They should do like they did in WCW back in the day :lol: just have the girls on a stage or catwalk away from the ring. Sad innit? Just how many jobs are affected by over-regulation.
Nitro Girls.

Do a dance number..
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:31
Frostieballs wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 09:40 I think Eddie had already dropped them?
Yeh, the big promoters in the UK have dropped them.

If a woman wants to be a ringcard girl flippin let them.
Is that confirmed anywhere Hearn and Warren dropped em? Couldnt find an article on it.

They refused to drop them in 2018 when Darts and Formula one did. Barry Hearn complained the "PC brigade forced their hand".

It was Sky and ITV execs that demanded they dropped them for Darts, Kevin Lygo at ITV was one.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103145
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

peter barlow wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:59
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:31
Frostieballs wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 09:40 I think Eddie had already dropped them?
Yeh, the big promoters in the UK have dropped them.

If a woman wants to be a ringcard girl flippin let them.
Is that confirmed anywhere Hearn and Warren dropped em? Couldnt find an article on it.

They refused to drop them in 2018 when Darts and Formula one did. Barry Hearn complained the "PC brigade forced their hand".

It was Sky and ITV execs that demanded they dropped them for Darts, Kevin Lygo at ITV was one.
Most of them just got phased out..
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:06 eddeh is hiring them as boxers these days
It's kinda strange Ringcard girls arent good enough, then suddenly we have the Ebanie Bridges, Maya Jamas and Laura Woods types all front and centre.

Literally only there for their looks and to try attract drooling casuals.
Foggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 12:07

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by Foggy »

Suppose its an extra cost they can do without
ERIC GUY
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 30 Jan 2009, 21:13

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by ERIC GUY »

THERE IS ALWAYS RING CARD GIRLS ON LONDON SHOWS,
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:06 eddeh is hiring them as boxers these days
You aren't wrong



Makes a mockery of womens boxing though
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

peter barlow wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 18:22
margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 10:06 eddeh is hiring them as boxers these days
You aren't wrong



Makes a mockery of womens boxing though
That woman can actually fight though. She's tough. Nobody can deny that. She may have lost in that match against Shannon Courtenay but it was competitive.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya she can take a good beating and gets some massive shiners doesnt she

helps her score great wins over the likes of nobody

she was literally a ring card go and then just tried boxing and because she's got massive tiddies gets on shows like this


even the one who beat her, shannon courtney, had her claim to fame simply for training at the same gym as aj and being a drug addict
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

what's going on with her left eye btw.....are those moles or piercings or what
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 19:20 ya she can take a good beating and gets some massive shiners doesnt she

helps her score great wins over the likes of nobody

she was literally a ring card go and then just tried boxing and because she's got massive tiddies gets on shows like this


even the one who beat her, shannon courtney, had her claim to fame simply for training at the same gym as aj and being a drug addict
The Muhammad Ali of women's boxing according to GAD

HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

You blokes are really quite critical of anyone who tries and fails or succeeds. If she loses, she's just a damn tramp anyways. If she wins, she's just a recovering drug addict who only got to where she's at because of Anthony Joshua.

There was literally a world title on the line. Who the hell do you think you are? I mean wtf have you done in boxing? Honestly? Fuuck you people are trolls. By definition that's what you are.

I bet you think Mia Saint John was just a tramp too. Too good looking to be taken seriously. Too sexy to be taken seriously. Too feminine to be taken seriously.

I bet you think the same of Christina Hammer. And Heather Hardy, I bet. Too pretty. Just a bunch of tarts. Nothing more. I'd bet the farm any of them could kick your asses.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

nope not at all, fair play to ebanie bridges for giving it a go and making the most of her giant tids that she constantly flashes, but she's still a total novelty who isnt any good at boxing, and on the topics of ring girls she actually was one lol. she stepped in the rings more times doing that than she did in actual fights.

that's obviously not the same case as someone like christina hammer, who has legit boxing and doesnt get forced into tv slots because she's got some bolt ons. heather hardy and mia st john both far more as boxers than banie is too
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by peter barlow »

HomicideHenry wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 20:16 You blokes are really quite critical of anyone who tries and fails or succeeds. If she loses, she's just a damn tramp anyways. If she wins, she's just a recovering drug addict who only got to where she's at because of Anthony Joshua.

There was literally a world title on the line. Who the hell do you think you are? I mean wtf have you done in boxing? Honestly? Fuuck you people are trolls. By definition that's what you are.

I bet you think Mia Saint John was just a tramp too. Too good looking to be taken seriously. Too sexy to be taken seriously. Too feminine to be taken seriously.

I bet you think the same of Christina Hammer. And Heather Hardy, I bet. Too pretty. Just a bunch of tarts. Nothing more. I'd bet the farm any of them could kick your asses.
:TU: Only troll here is you Henry.

It's the drooling mugs like yourself that has these slappers taking up space on boxing shows and presenting.

Hearn sees you and you're ilk as marks and knows you'll pay up if you see a bit of tits and arse on display.

As for the actual women boxers the Natasha Jonas, the Katie Taylor's, they earned their respect and it makes a mockery of what they do having some Aussie bimbo shake her tits to the main stage.
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

If you can't see that that woman actually put in the time and the effort to actually learn how to box and actually put on a very good performance even though she lost I don't know what to tell you.

It's as if you guys are comparing everyone to the cream of the crop like Katie Taylor or Claressa Shields, and viewing everybody else as being complete dog shit. Again I bet the farm that this woman you run down would beat your ass any day of the week..

I mean come on post your picture show the whole forum what you even look like. You're not a boxer who the hell are you to criticize anybody who actually puts in effort into anything?

I guarantee I know more about this sport than you could ever dream about--- you're the fuucking troll, all I ever see is nothing but negativity oozing out of that asshole you call a mouth.

The only time I buy pay-per-views is when it is for the heavyweight championship of the world. Fury/Wilder was the last time I purchased anything from this sport. In this day and age why pay for anything when it's live streamed for free somewhere.

"Just tits and nothing else." I hope you don't have a wife or girlfriend, because that's a horrible thing to say. That woman puts in the time and effort to be a fighter, and in a competitive fight for the world title.

Let's see your ass get off the couch and do the same thing in the same amount of time and fights she did and had.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

she's 5'2, 115 pound (10 of that in the tits) and never beat anyone with a positive record mate, im not sure she'd be unbeatable for the forum lol

unlike yourself, some of us have also trained and boxed proper am bouts too, and actually can box just a bit
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

margaret thatcher wrote: 03 Aug 2021, 20:59 she's 5'2, 115 pound (10 of that in the tits) and never beat anyone with a positive record mate, im not sure she'd be unbeatable for the forum lol

unlike yourself, some of us have also trained and boxed proper am bouts too, and actually can box just a bit
Show your film footage and post pictures of yourself Billy badass or otherwise shut the hell up. Far as I'm concerned you're nothing more than a damn casual who keeps running his mouth Non-Stop.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by margaret thatcher »

dont have any, dont need any either, all my points stand just as well regardless

maybe she could fight your powerlifter crush, your heart would get pumping for that one! you dont seem to be drawn to the actual good, legit female boxers out there do you, the ones who should be taken seriously
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Ringcard girls

Post by HomicideHenry »

I pay attention to a lot of fights. I only posted the Stefi Cohen thing because somebody made a thread about Eddie Hall and the other strongman. Believe you me I want to see Katie Taylor versus Amanda Serrano, and Claressa Shields versus Savannah Marshall.

I was just defending the woman, because you guys are judging her way too damn harshly because she did give a damn good account of herself in a competitive fight for the world title.

You are diminishing a person, strictly on the basis of her looks and her former profession. That fight was competitive. So she wasn't a bum. And neither is Shannon Courtenay. If you cannot see that both of them have skills then you are not true boxing fans.

Again the kind of things that you say constantly has to be the telltale sign of a troll. Women's boxing has progressed to the point where even novices today are worlds better than they were in the 1980s and 1990s when it was largely slapping contests. They actually put in the work and the time--- and it shows.

Hell you were pretty damn critical of Stefi Cohen too, someone who had only been training for a year with zero experience. She gave a decent account of herself and she seems pretty sincere about wanting to get better and better. You are awfully critical for somebody who gives no proof of his own abilities.

You remind me of a quote from Einstein that goes something like this: "Everybody is a genius but if you judge a fish on its inability to climb a tree it will go through its whole life believing it is stupid."
Post Reply