My conclusion is that you don't know what you're talking about, and it's a waste of my time to try educate someone on something that's obvious to absolutely everyone else on Earth that watches Boxing.
Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
Re: Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
Re: Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
Your arguments were mostly over with phrases like "boxing fans, boxing critics know it", "no one said what you are talking about" and "that's obvious to absolutely everyone", so it doesn't seem, that your were working on them too hard.
Re: Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
I gave my own thoughts on it too. I am a Boxing expert. I'm just not the only one.DrDuke wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 15:07Your arguments were mostly over with phrases like "boxing fans, boxing critics know it", "no one said what you are talking about" and "that's obvious to absolutely everyone", so it doesn't seem, that your were working on them too hard.
Re: Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
I've done a research via Google to prove your theory about using Gene Fullmer and John Ruiz in the same sentence. As far as I progressed, I can only make a conclusion, that I pioneered that phenomenon. Google proves it right with the first link. The next two links point at threads "Ugliest fighter to watch?" and "the 10 worst skilled boxers" on the other boxing forum, where Gene Fullmer and John Ruiz are only in the nearby posts. So far your theory remains accurate, fellow expert.gilgamesh wrote: ↑11 Aug 2021, 15:08I gave my own thoughts on it too. I am a Boxing expert. I'm just not the only one.
Re: Freddie Steele versus Gene Fullmer
"10 worst skilled boxers"? Weird wording on that one. I'm not sure what that's even supposed to mean.