obvious rigondeaux height error

Post Reply
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39226
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

obvious rigondeaux height error

Post by margaret thatcher »

rigo has been listed at 5'4.5 most of his career from what i recall......boxrec for some reason now has him at 5'7 , which is obviously wrong. what is the reason for random changes like that? do fighters teams contact boxrec privately or something because they are insecure about his height

here he is weighing in vs liborio solis, who is at 5'4 on boxrec

rigo = https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/492989

Image
John
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9048
Joined: 08 May 2000, 20:00

Re: obvious rigondeaux height error

Post by John »

It was changed by the commission when they created his licence, I guess they took it off his passport.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39226
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: obvious rigondeaux height error

Post by margaret thatcher »

lol, then i guess rigo gave himself a 3 inch bonus for his id :lol:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39226
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: obvious rigondeaux height error

Post by margaret thatcher »

fwiw, he was listed at 5'4 in the tale of the tape vs casimero yesterday
Petu v.d. Pajm
Editor
Editor
Posts: 807
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 09:50

Re: obvious rigondeaux height error

Post by Petu v.d. Pajm »

John wrote: 12 Aug 2021, 03:31 It was changed by the commission when they created his licence, I guess they took it off his passport.
Passports do not include height information surely????
Post Reply