Billy Joe Saunders interview

high tower 1
Lightweight
Posts: 1610
Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 09:36

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by high tower 1 »

brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:21
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:13 top boxer managerd rubbish for my likeing , should have fought the like of saul 3 years ago, he would still beat Andrade. eubanks jr with one arm probably
I think he was managed brilliantly in hindsight. Nabbed a belt and held on to it until the eventual big payday came. Can’t really argue with that.
but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years

Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by coghaugen11 »

:stop:
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:21
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:13 top boxer managerd rubbish for my likeing , should have fought the like of saul 3 years ago, he would still beat Andrade. eubanks jr with one arm probably
I think he was managed brilliantly in hindsight. Nabbed a belt and held on to it until the eventual big payday came. Can’t really argue with that.
but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years
He wouldn’t fight anyone. Too busy sniffing bag and that.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by brilo33 »

high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:18
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:21

I think he was managed brilliantly in hindsight. Nabbed a belt and held on to it until the eventual big payday came. Can’t really argue with that.
but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years

Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
i reckon he could of beat triple g, not by standing trading cause that man is granite, i reckon he could of done a hit and run job on him when he was younger and g had come out of them tough fights, i dont mean when both were at there peak g would of stopped him before 6 i mean a couple a years ago
Last edited by brilo33 on 17 Sep 2021, 19:57, edited 1 time in total.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by brilo33 »

coghaugen11 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:20 :stop:
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:21

I think he was managed brilliantly in hindsight. Nabbed a belt and held on to it until the eventual big payday came. Can’t really argue with that.
but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years
He wouldn’t fight anyone. Too busy sniffing bag and that.
but wheres that come from ive never heard of billy being thrown out of bars clubs what ever for doing that or drinking or anthing, and iam sure the media would of loved that, you dont get to the top sniffing that, and there is nothing you can do if there is boxers that are better than you saul ggg
high tower 1
Lightweight
Posts: 1610
Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 09:36

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by high tower 1 »

brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:47
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:18
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42

but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years

Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
i reckon he could of beat triple g, not by standing trading cause that man is granite, i reckon he could of done a hit and run job on him when he was younger and g had come out of them tough fights, i dont mean when both were at there peak g would of stopped him before 6 i mean a couple a years ago
In the cold light of day he squeeked pay Ryder , Eubanks and Lee ( his best win IMO). He breezed past lem, who had a dig but cement feet. ggg is a different animal.

As said before he played a blinder nabbing the wbo belt and sitting on it until the big pay day eventually came. A lot of smoke and mirrors though in that career.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by brilo33 »

high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 20:56
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:47
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:18


Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
i reckon he could of beat triple g, not by standing trading cause that man is granite, i reckon he could of done a hit and run job on him when he was younger and g had come out of them tough fights, i dont mean when both were at there peak g would of stopped him before 6 i mean a couple a years ago
In the cold light of day he squeeked pay Ryder , Eubanks and Lee ( his best win IMO). He breezed past lem, who had a dig but cement feet. ggg is a different animal.

As said before he played a blinder nabbing the wbo belt and sitting on it until the big pay day eventually came. A lot of smoke and mirrors though in that career.
he squeeked by because they were good foe but he did win i think baring ggg at that time he was up there
Finkel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1412
Joined: 08 Sep 2018, 20:51

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by Finkel »

maverick23 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 02:04
Finkel wrote: 16 Sep 2021, 23:26
Manchester Hitman wrote: 16 Sep 2021, 05:36 I don’t like Saunders, but from his point of view I think Tibbs didn’t do the best thing to protect him straight after the fight.

He gave an interview when Billy was leaving the arena, and disclosed about Billy not giving him
the right signals etc.

It was great for us to get the info, but it threw Billy under the bus.
Exactly this. It was a bad look from Tibbs, that. I also suspect it influenced Dubois' decision to leave him less than a week later.

You need to trust that your corner is going to put your best interests first. Tibbs was doing the opposite there, and it just stank of Tibbs getting his story in early to cover his own ass.
Tibbs opted not to continue with Dubois as his dad was interfering too much. At least that’s what Tibbs said anyway and in fairness I don’t have down as someone who blags.
Fair enough. I put two and two together and got seven it seems.
Though he literally just demonstrated he is willing to say what he needs to cover himself. But as you say, we should take him at his word until shown different.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32933
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by Boxerbeetle »

handsofstone wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 17:25 What I will say about all the terrible things Saunders has done, the fact that got a fine and had to apologize for demonstrating on a punchbag how to beat up a woman was pathetic, clearly a joke and harmed nobody
Yeah that was ridiculous.
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by coghaugen11 »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 18 Sep 2021, 07:35
handsofstone wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 17:25 What I will say about all the terrible things Saunders has done, the fact that got a fine and had to apologize for demonstrating on a punchbag how to beat up a woman was pathetic, clearly a joke and harmed nobody
Yeah that was ridiculous.
I’m sure abused women enjoyed watching that, didn’t torment them in any way.
Steveh583
Super Featherweight
Posts: 4375
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:06

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by Steveh583 »

coghaugen11 wrote: 18 Sep 2021, 08:05
Boxerbeetle wrote: 18 Sep 2021, 07:35
handsofstone wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 17:25 What I will say about all the terrible things Saunders has done, the fact that got a fine and had to apologize for demonstrating on a punchbag how to beat up a woman was pathetic, clearly a joke and harmed nobody
Yeah that was ridiculous.
I’m sure abused women enjoyed watching that, didn’t torment them in any way.
but going on that trajectory, everyone in the world would be fined for something or other. quentin tarantino for traumatising victims of male rape. should pulp fiction be banned?
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by coghaugen11 »

What was the purpose of it? If you found it funny, you must be a bit sick because many women were being battered in lockdown.
Last edited by coghaugen11 on 18 Sep 2021, 18:28, edited 1 time in total.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23193
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by handsofstone »

coghaugen11 wrote: 18 Sep 2021, 16:17 What was the purpose of it? If you found it funny, you must be a sick because many women were being battered in lockdown.

I doubt many claim its funny, doesn't mean it's anything more than sh1t banter
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8610
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by coneye »

Has a person he certainly comes across has a bullying peice of shit no doubt about that ,, just watch how he bullies the other knob Kugan , but with saying that theres a lot who use the slightest excuse to sling mud at him ,, the whole belt women thing was idiotic but not harmful , a lot of other stuff is stupid but really showing what a dick he can be , nothing aticular harmful ,, then again there is something that are , making that guy strip off , phoning that womans partner bad bad show .

But has a boxer , he was good , but never true world champ material ,he was a promoters champ , ducked and bought there way to a title , but heh he's only one of many top 5 certainly but lets have it right he never fought the best and when he did he got clobbered and quit and quit he did ,,

I for one NEVER believed he suffered the damage he claims , for a guy who loved the u tube and Kugan interviews has much has he did he never shown his face did he ,, and theres no way would they hospitalize him , operate and get him back to England in 5 days where he then went in hidin from the press , having suffered from the same thing he claims happenned to him i just don't believe it ,

Whats that prove , nothing , except he has a lot of quit in him , he will never be this gypsy warrior he claims to be , because he's a bully , he's a great giver but against someone who was just has good well in fact better ,, he quit ,

This is why he's demanding so much to fight Eubank , now lets have it right Eubank is the only big fight out there for Saunders , , and he's making a way out with the money , Jeez even a million would be good enough money ,, but Billy knows , Eubank knows , that put it on him for 6 rnds make him tire and he will quit after that ,, the blueprint has been set , match him pressure him , break his spirit and watch him quit .

And the reason he will quit is because he believes his own excuses ,, you only have to look at the shape he's shown up for in some of his fights its shown he's quit in camp , quit putting the hard work in , and got away with it because of the matchmaking , sooner or later he would fight someone who would make him quit in the ring ,, Canelo done it easy ,, GGG would do it easier , and now i think Eubank could do it has well .

So the best thing for tis bully is take his millions and foook off
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by coghaugen11 »

I think Canelo was just getting warmed up as well.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by bigjack »

coneye wrote: 18 Sep 2021, 21:38 Has a person he certainly comes across has a bullying peice of shit no doubt about that ,, just watch how he bullies the other knob Kugan , but with saying that theres a lot who use the slightest excuse to sling mud at him ,, the whole belt women thing was idiotic but not harmful , a lot of other stuff is stupid but really showing what a dick he can be , nothing aticular harmful ,, then again there is something that are , making that guy strip off , phoning that womans partner bad bad show .

But has a boxer , he was good , but never true world champ material ,he was a promoters champ , ducked and bought there way to a title , but heh he's only one of many top 5 certainly but lets have it right he never fought the best and when he did he got clobbered and quit and quit he did ,,

I for one NEVER believed he suffered the damage he claims , for a guy who loved the u tube and Kugan interviews has much has he did he never shown his face did he ,, and theres no way would they hospitalize him , operate and get him back to England in 5 days where he then went in hidin from the press , having suffered from the same thing he claims happenned to him i just don't believe it ,

Whats that prove , nothing , except he has a lot of quit in him , he will never be this gypsy warrior he claims to be , because he's a bully , he's a great giver but against someone who was just has good well in fact better ,, he quit ,

This is why he's demanding so much to fight Eubank , now lets have it right Eubank is the only big fight out there for Saunders , , and he's making a way out with the money , Jeez even a million would be good enough money ,, but Billy knows , Eubank knows , that put it on him for 6 rnds make him tire and he will quit after that ,, the blueprint has been set , match him pressure him , break his spirit and watch him quit .

And the reason he will quit is because he believes his own excuses ,, you only have to look at the shape he's shown up for in some of his fights its shown he's quit in camp , quit putting the hard work in , and got away with it because of the matchmaking , sooner or later he would fight someone who would make him quit in the ring ,, Canelo done it easy ,, GGG would do it easier , and now i think Eubank could do it has well .

So the best thing for tis bully is take his millions and foook off
good post :TU:
therealhustle
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 31 Jul 2010, 16:30

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by therealhustle »

You’re basically describing BJS…….. 🤔
Wee Tommy wrote: 16 Sep 2021, 01:58
margaret thatcher wrote: 15 Sep 2021, 21:18 bill's beard hides the poop stain on his face pretty well
Why do you have to mention that? Just comes over as childish and scummy. :confused:
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by margaret thatcher »

:TU:
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by Wee Tommy »

therealhustle wrote: 19 Sep 2021, 03:46 You’re basically describing BJS…….. 🤔
Wee Tommy wrote: 16 Sep 2021, 01:58
margaret thatcher wrote: 15 Sep 2021, 21:18 bill's beard hides the poop stain on his face pretty well
Why do you have to mention that? Just comes over as childish and scummy. :confused:
I agree the guys an arsehole but to point out a birth defect is just weird. IMO of course.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:47
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:18
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 18:42

but who apart from saul do you think would of beat him at midd in last few years

Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
i reckon he could of beat triple g, not by standing trading cause that man is granite, i reckon he could of done a hit and run job on him when he was younger and g had come out of them tough fights, i dont mean when both were at there peak g would of stopped him before 6 i mean a couple a years ago
Golovkin is far too good a technician for Saunders to run like a thief and win. Even an older version of GGG would have been able to cut down the ring and hit him often enough to win
Omerta
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 261
Joined: 21 Aug 2011, 08:11

Re: Billy Joe Saunders interview

Post by Omerta »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 20 Sep 2021, 13:55
brilo33 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:47
high tower 1 wrote: 17 Sep 2021, 19:18


Saunders ? He was never beating golovkin or Canelo. And they’re the ones that mattered.
i reckon he could of beat triple g, not by standing trading cause that man is granite, i reckon he could of done a hit and run job on him when he was younger and g had come out of them tough fights, i dont mean when both were at there peak g would of stopped him before 6 i mean a couple a years ago
Golovkin is far too good a technician for Saunders to run like a thief and win. Even an older version of GGG would have been able to cut down the ring and hit him often enough to win
Exactly. People also forgetting how badly Saunders gassed in the 2nd half of his fights, making him a sitting duck for any elite level fighter like ggg
Post Reply