Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by deadpan »

Should he have to explain that?
aicheligad
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 11:57

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by aicheligad »

This dude shouldn't score any fights. Didn't he scored Prodan-Marku 97-93 for Marku? Also, he often wents with cards like 115-114 when it's needed (i. e. when the A side slighty lost). Btw, the 58-57 card in young Hatton's fight today seems to be a typical British scorecard - when you have it a draw, just make one round 10-10 and it's done. Rarely see that in other countries. Of course, there are robberies in other countries too, what I mean is that every scene has like it's own ''style'' :lol:
aicheligad
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 645
Joined: 09 Nov 2020, 11:57

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by aicheligad »

deadpan wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 20:41 Should he have to explain that?
Btw, they'll say, he wasn't too wrong, look at the compubox stats (that make no sense as usual, according to them, Joshua threw +100 more punches than Usyk lol). Didn't Hearn said that that Joshua was winning until the round 8?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

hearn also said that chisora beat usyk :lol:
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

robert smith is probably twerkin his shady arse to that scorecard btw. actually, maybe it's too generous to usyk for him
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9188
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by gregregegg »

while i didnt give AJ 5 rounds, i dont think its too wild, dosent even scratch the surface of bad judging really. AJ outlanded usyk in 5 rounds i think so it wont cause a drama. (although i think i had it 10-2 while not actualy juding).
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5006
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by Glass Joe »

Foster clearly wanted to score it for a draw for a chance of a fight being a draw but had no choice to score the last for Usyk :OhYes: :OhYes:
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by peter barlow »

What about Campbell Hatton I heard it was a robbery? Marcus McDonnell ref
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

campbell won 1 round, 2 at tops

whenever the house boxer wins 58-57 or 77-76 you can bet it's probably shady. them crooked refs love giving those even rounds when the away boxer should've gotten the round

mcdonnell was also one of the judges who robbed minoume blind vs mckenna
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by Crease »

Could be worse, at least he got the result correct...
But 115-113 really is too generous to AJ....
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by peter barlow »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 21:54 campbell won 1 round, 2 at tops

whenever the house boxer wins 58-57 or 77-76 you can bet it's probably shady. them crooked refs love giving those even rounds when the away boxer should've gotten the round

mcdonnell was also one of the judges who robbed minoume blind vs mckenna
Id swear Hatton was 1/100 to win pre fight, how the fornicate could he be exposed by such a handpicked guy and need a robbery, he must be absolute gash?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

yep, he's just so poor that even guys like that he can barely beat
peter barlow
Middleweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by peter barlow »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 22:02 yep, he's just so poor that even guys like that he can barely beat
Eddie needs to part ways only so much a name can give.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

he's about as good as mick hennesey's kid
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26631
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by KiwiRider »

margaret thatcher wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 22:04 he's about as good as mick hennesey's kid
Were you listening to Taylor say they should lower the level of opposition for him next time?
I laughed, there isn't any lower.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

lol i know right

i guess lower would be the guys brought in to get ko'd in those latvian gym fights :lol:
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13909
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by Ricky »

The fight was so one sided not even a crooked judge could get to 114 :lol:


FVCK HOWARD FOSTER
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by DrDuke »

A robbery attempt gone wrong because of the sheer dominance of the Ukrainian grandmaster.
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by adislav123 »

peter barlow wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 21:52 What about Campbell Hatton I heard it was a robbery? Marcus McDonnell ref
couldn't believe they pulled that shit really off. disgusting.

that poor guy martinez. gives it all, legit wins the fight for fvckin everybody to see. makes a fool of the hatton boy in the process & get's shat on big time.

crystal clear, blatant robbery. disgraceful.

i just don't get it in my head that there's no way to overrule shit like this. even when it's such obvious corruption. :brick: 🤑🤮
Last edited by adislav123 on 26 Sep 2021, 04:02, edited 1 time in total.
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by adislav123 »

Glass Joe wrote: 25 Sep 2021, 21:43 Foster clearly wanted to score it for a draw for a chance of a fight being a draw but had no choice to score the last for Usyk :OhYes: :OhYes:
nothing else. pure disgrace.

corruption at the fvckin highest level.

tryin' to fvck over a deserving man for the most prestigious title in all sports he frikkin' dedicated his whole life to achieve.

vile shit🤑🤮
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by DrDuke »

The full scores are here https://boxrec.com/en/scoring/2695141

This corrupt b!tch was scoring for Joshua since the start. Joshua came a bit alive only in the middle of the fight and just for a while. What a disgraceful idiot.
zeroprobe
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 114
Joined: 11 Aug 2005, 02:12

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by zeroprobe »

It is so corrupt, how does he score the first two rounds for Joshua, the judge should be fired alone for that.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

foster had aj up going into the 10th.....

though at least he had the right guy winning, unlike marcus mcdonnell giving cambpell hatton a gift
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23193
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by handsofstone »

Apart from Health and Safety the BBBC aren't fit for purpose, dreadful officiating time and again, nearly all of them, I remember when it was just 1 or 2, refs still scoring fights, the daft Tech Draw after a head clash before 4 rounds, they are fcking rank truth be told

Robert Smith needs to go, this isn't a Matchroom/Queensbury thing, it's the personnel
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39335
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Howard Foster 115-113 scorecard

Post by margaret thatcher »

smith is awful, pretty much every time ive seen him address bad scoring it'ss basically 'armchair fans, they know nothing' etc
Post Reply