Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post Reply
Grant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1693
Joined: 23 Jan 2004, 21:41

Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by Grant »

Just watched this fight again and I have two observations. Douglas performance was worthy of a champion despite his underdog status, and one of the judges had Tyson ahead going in to what turned out to be the last round, another judge had it even. Ridiculous scoring IMO
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by DrDuke »

Yeah, the scoring sucked. It was even possible to give Tyson only a KD round.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by milpool »

DrDuke wrote: 24 Sep 2021, 05:07 Yeah, the scoring sucked. It was even possible to give Tyson only a KD round.
I'd agree with that. I would struggle to give Tyson a single round other than the 8th.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by Bodyshot3 »

Yeah, the scoring sucked. It was even possible to give Tyson only a KD round.
Don King wankfest, Don King fighter mate.
The cards were rigged.

Buster needed that stoppage unless he droppped Iron Mike six or seven times from start-to-finish.
Probably only been a split decision then.

Even after Mike was comprehensively wrecked...... King was (as far as I can recall) hollering and bellowing that it should be a no-contest and called as null and void :roll:

I don't miss that bell-end at all.
bollocks
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1409
Joined: 18 Oct 2016, 04:54

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by bollocks »

Bodyshot3 wrote: 04 Oct 2021, 14:30
Yeah, the scoring sucked. It was even possible to give Tyson only a KD round.
Don King wankfest, Don King fighter mate.
The cards were rigged.

Buster needed that stoppage unless he droppped Iron Mike six or seven times from start-to-finish.
Probably only been a split decision then.

Even after Mike was comprehensively wrecked...... King was (as far as I can recall) hollering and bellowing that it should be a no-contest and called as null and void :roll:

I don't miss that bell-end at all.
From memory he was also yelling his head off at Sulaiman to delcare it a long count and therefore null the result :doh:
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by Ambling Alp II »

He did. King was trying to get it declared a no-contest. In the days that followed he realized that public opinion was against this, and he dropped that idea.
Jeff_lacy_ko
Super Featherweight
Posts: 5713
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by Jeff_lacy_ko »

I remember US boxing writers taking king to task at the press conference when he was trying to steal the title from douglas.

Total pos like always

Yeah mike won 1 round maybe 2. He was domintaed and there is always at least one corrupt judge isnt there?
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by rob h »

A few dubious moments in the fight are always glossed over and forgotten in history due to the fact that... Well the fact that he was the first to legitimately own Mike Tyson at a time that Tyson had mythical status. Give him his due though, a proper example of "mind over matter". Would any heavyweight in history have beaten Douglas that night?
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15708
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by elmersalsa »

rob h wrote: 09 Oct 2021, 19:54 A few dubious moments in the fight are always glossed over and forgotten in history due to the fact that... Well the fact that he was the first to legitimately own Mike Tyson at a time that Tyson had mythical status. Give him his due though, a proper example of "mind over matter". Would any heavyweight in history have beaten Douglas that night?
I don't know if Buster could repeat that performance. He was very inconsistent.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by Ambling Alp II »

rob h wrote: 09 Oct 2021, 19:54 A few dubious moments in the fight are always glossed over and forgotten in history due to the fact that... Well the fact that he was the first to legitimately own Mike Tyson at a time that Tyson had mythical status. Give him his due though, a proper example of "mind over matter". Would any heavyweight in history have beaten Douglas that night?
Yes, but only a handful. Great performance.
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Buster Douglas V Mike Tyson

Post by p4p1 »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 10 Oct 2021, 21:09
rob h wrote: 09 Oct 2021, 19:54 A few dubious moments in the fight are always glossed over and forgotten in history due to the fact that... Well the fact that he was the first to legitimately own Mike Tyson at a time that Tyson had mythical status. Give him his due though, a proper example of "mind over matter". Would any heavyweight in history have beaten Douglas that night?
Yes, but only a handful. Great performance.
Totally agree, he looked like an ATG that night unfortunately it was just for that night though.
Post Reply