Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
-
Perkin Warbeck
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53
Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
I see Eric Molina has fallen 15 down to #78 after yesterday's fight, but Alen Babic is not included in the rankings:
https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?r%5Brole% ... 5D=a&r_go=
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/852032
He was not in the heavyweight rankings before the fight either. I wonder why?
https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?r%5Brole% ... 5D=a&r_go=
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/852032
He was not in the heavyweight rankings before the fight either. I wonder why?
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Cause he's officially rated by Suleiman's idiots in bridgerweight.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
So Boxrec is going to officially recognize this badgerweight division?
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
His weight qualifies him as a Bridgerweight even though he fights as a Heavyweight.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Keep up the good work boxrec! 
We don't want no stinkin badgerweight
We don't want no stinkin badgerweight
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9415
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at allcandyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 11:44 His weight qualifies him as a Bridgerweight even though he fights as a Heavyweight.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
-
gregregegg
- Lightweight
- Posts: 9143
- Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Blaim the wbc. Although babic could still be ranked at heavyweight. Until he has a fight sanctioned at bridgerweight. But my guess is boxrec are protesting Bridger hard and early which I have to support. If boxrec did rank him Babic would probably otherwise be around 50-40th.tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 13:56I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at allcandyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 11:44 His weight qualifies him as a Bridgerweight even though he fights as a Heavyweight.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 13:56I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at allcandyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 11:44 His weight qualifies him as a Bridgerweight even though he fights as a Heavyweight.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
It’s not such a big issue, considering Babic hasn’t beaten anyone noteworthy.
As entertaining as he might be, his resume is complete utter garbage.
As entertaining as he might be, his resume is complete utter garbage.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
He's an entertaining sideshow filler for boxing events. No less, and not much more.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 16:00 It’s not such a big issue, considering Babic hasn’t beaten anyone noteworthy.
As entertaining as he might be, his resume is complete utter garbage.
And if you were to rank him as a heavy, he would be top 100.
A better career choice would be to fight as a heavyweight, maybe he will. There are plenty of genuine pleather belts out there.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
The question was asked about Babic but that is incidental. It's not about the boxer it's the principle. Let's pretend Rivas was a very active and successful fighter. Would you consider it sensible to deny him a rating ... anywhere?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 16:00 It’s not such a big issue, considering Babic hasn’t beaten anyone noteworthy.
As entertaining as he might be, his resume is complete utter garbage.
-
Perkin Warbeck
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 25 Jun 2018, 19:53
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
I agree that bridgerweight should not even exist, and the WBC is a disgrace for creating it.
But Babic has never officially fought at bridgerweight, only at heavyweight.
Is the WBC rating him at bridgerweight a good reason to keep him out of the BoxRec heavyweight rankings? So if the WBC rates, say, Usyk or Hunter at bridgerweight, would they be out of the BoxRec heavyweight ratings?
Or should they only be removed if they fight for the WBC bridgerweight title?
But Babic has never officially fought at bridgerweight, only at heavyweight.
Is the WBC rating him at bridgerweight a good reason to keep him out of the BoxRec heavyweight rankings? So if the WBC rates, say, Usyk or Hunter at bridgerweight, would they be out of the BoxRec heavyweight ratings?
Or should they only be removed if they fight for the WBC bridgerweight title?
Good post.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Umm, no I'm not, but Tiny might be.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 13:56I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at allcandyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 11:44 His weight qualifies him as a Bridgerweight even though he fights as a Heavyweight.
BoxRec don't recognize Bridgerweight so he can't be rated at Bridgerweight but because he qualifies as a Bridgerweight and one of the four or five governing bodies regard him as a Bridgerweight, BoxRec cannot rate him as a Heavyweight even if he does fight at Heavyweight.
Ergo he no longer exists and cannot be rated anywhere.
I think that about sums up the ... er ... logic.
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
I agree with your post. But I hate yet another division and more flippin belts.
Like Tiny, I'd love to bury my head and ignore Badgerweight (I've trained my phone to predict that already) all together.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9415
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
I think the majority of us don't think the Bridgerweight is a great idea. But fact of the matter is it is here and the fighters in that division still deserve to be rated somewhere.KiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 19:56Umm, no I'm not, but Tiny might be.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 13:56
I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at all
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
I agree with your post. But I hate yet another division and more flippin belts.
Like Tiny, I'd love to bury my head and ignore Badgerweight (I've trained my phone to predict that already) all together.
And no one wants more belts. I'd venture to say you wouldn't be able to pawn most belts anymore.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39211
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
has babby even had a sanctioned bridgerweight fight?
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Ha! Yeah I can just imagine an episode of Pawn Stars:tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:00I think the majority of us don't think the Bridgerweight is a great idea. But fact of the matter is it is here and the fighters in that division still deserve to be rated somewhere.KiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 19:56Umm, no I'm not, but Tiny might be.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41
It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
I agree with your post. But I hate yet another division and more flippin belts.
Like Tiny, I'd love to bury my head and ignore Badgerweight (I've trained my phone to predict that already) all together.
And no one wants more belts. I'd venture to say you wouldn't be able to pawn most belts anymore.Too damn many out there
"So tell me again what this is?"
"It's the Badgerweight Interim Intercontinental Champion in Recess Belt. Held by Fres (
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9415
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
And Chum would say all I can do is $30 bucks and Rick might even fire me for offering that muchKiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:11Ha! Yeah I can just imagine an episode of Pawn Stars:tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:00I think the majority of us don't think the Bridgerweight is a great idea. But fact of the matter is it is here and the fighters in that division still deserve to be rated somewhere.
And no one wants more belts. I'd venture to say you wouldn't be able to pawn most belts anymore.Too damn many out there
"So tell me again what this is?"
"It's the Badgerweight Interim Intercontinental Champion in Recess Belt. Held by Fres () Oquendo in the men's room of the MGM Grand while Alen Babic the cabbage took a leak"
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:16And Chum would say all I can do is $30 bucks and Rick might even fire me for offering that muchKiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:11Ha! Yeah I can just imagine an episode of Pawn Stars:tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:00
I think the majority of us don't think the Bridgerweight is a great idea. But fact of the matter is it is here and the fighters in that division still deserve to be rated somewhere.
And no one wants more belts. I'd venture to say you wouldn't be able to pawn most belts anymore.Too damn many out there
"So tell me again what this is?"
"It's the Badgerweight Interim Intercontinental Champion in Recess Belt. Held by Fres () Oquendo in the men's room of the MGM Grand while Alen Babic the cabbage took a leak"
![]()
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
It wasn't Tiny complimenting BoxRec on their good work.KiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 19:56Umm, no I'm not, but Tiny might be.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 13:56
I can not figure boxrec out with this situation. Rivas and Babic just don't exist in their eyes anymore. No sense at all
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
I agree with your post. But I hate yet another division and more flippin belts.
Like Tiny, I'd love to bury my head and ignore Badgerweight (I've trained my phone to predict that already) all together.
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
I don't think they get enough compliments. Even if I disagreed with the decision, I would respect someone, anyone, having the balls to stand up for anything in this cancel backbone woketastic world.candyslim wrote: ↑01 Nov 2021, 02:32It wasn't Tiny complimenting BoxRec on their good work.KiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 19:56Umm, no I'm not, but Tiny might be.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 15:41
It's nuts. Ok BoxRec don't want Bridgerweight fair enough, so rate them as Heavyweights. Babic hasn't even fought in the Bridgerweight division.
It's only the WBC that considers Bridgerweight to be a weight division so do what everybody else does: Ignore it and treat the fighters as Heavyweights. To me that is just commonsense.
Kiwi mate you're missing the point: You can't say there is no such thing as Bridgerweight and then not rate someone because he's a Bridgerweight.
He's a bona fide professional boxer so if you don't rate him here then you have to rate him there. Pretending he has left the planet is the worst of all possible options.
I agree with your post. But I hate yet another division and more flippin belts.
Like Tiny, I'd love to bury my head and ignore Badgerweight (I've trained my phone to predict that already) all together.![]()
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
Do what RING MAGAZINE used to do from 1978-1984 where they listed the cruiserweights as light heavyweights because they did not recognize the cruiserweight division for a couple of years.
The man certainly needs to be ranked as a heavyweight. All of us genuine boxing fans see the man as being a heavyweight because he is 210 pounds, and as far as most of us are concerned anyone 200+ is a heavyweight.
I say continue to pretend that bridgerweight does not exist and rank the man as a heavyweight. Unless his management team has reached out to BoxRec and they don't want him ranked as a heavyweight--- and to do so would result in some sort of legal action against the website.
The man certainly needs to be ranked as a heavyweight. All of us genuine boxing fans see the man as being a heavyweight because he is 210 pounds, and as far as most of us are concerned anyone 200+ is a heavyweight.
I say continue to pretend that bridgerweight does not exist and rank the man as a heavyweight. Unless his management team has reached out to BoxRec and they don't want him ranked as a heavyweight--- and to do so would result in some sort of legal action against the website.
-
adislav123
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1745
- Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
bridgerweight in fact doesn't exist as far as any real fan of the sport should be concerned.
just cause mauricio got a retarded idea in a fever dream and puts out an anouncement and a nonsecial ranking, well... fornicate that.
who actually fought at shit beaver weight?
wait... i dont care one bit.
just cause mauricio got a retarded idea in a fever dream and puts out an anouncement and a nonsecial ranking, well... fornicate that.
who actually fought at shit beaver weight?
wait... i dont care one bit.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
To be honest, I don’t really pay much attention to BoxRec’s ratings nowadays, due to statistical anomalies produced by their algorithm.candyslim wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 16:41The question was asked about Babic but that is incidental. It's not about the boxer it's the principle.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 16:00 It’s not such a big issue, considering Babic hasn’t beaten anyone noteworthy.
As entertaining as he might be, his resume is complete utter garbage.
For instance:
• Jared Anderson is currently rated 58th by BoxRec’s heavyweight ratings.
• BoxRec recently rated Gervonta Davis above Josh Taylor at junior welterweight.
• Callum Smith is currently rated 9th in BoxRec's pound-for-pound ratings.
• BoxRec once rated Luis Nery as being sixth on their pound-for-pound ratings.
• BoxRec once rated Jeff Horn amongst the pound-for-pound elite (they ranked him in 9th place).
• Chris Eubank Jr. is currently rated above Vasyl Lomachenko in the BoxRec pound-for-pound ratings.
• Billy Joe Saunders was once rated 4th according to BoxRec's 168lb rankings, before he'd even fought in that weight class.
• Demetrius Andrade was recently rated 11th on BoxRec’s pound-for-pound list.
• Jermall Charlo was recently rated 6th on BoxRec’s pound-for-pound list.
• On the 29th June 2021, BoxRec rated a two-fight novice, David Mercardo as the third best pound-for-pound fighter on the planet!
In terms of Oscar Rivas, during a timeframe spanning almost three years, he’s been beaten by Dillian Whyte and has himself subsequently beaten two cruiserweights (i.e. opponents only weighing 203lbs).
The Colombian hasn’t beaten a legitimate heavyweight for almost three years. And currently campaigns as a bridgerweight.
And Alen Babic wants to face Oscar Rivas for a title that isn't recognised by BoxRec.
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6453
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: Why is Alen Babic not included in the heavyweight ratings on BoxRec?
KiwiRider wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:21tiny_acres wrote: ↑31 Oct 2021, 20:16And Chum would say all I can do is $30 bucks and Rick might even fire me for offering that much![]()
![]()