apollo creed wrote: ↑09 Nov 2021, 12:20What? EO, how so ? Are you having double standards regarding your darling, Charlito ? Isn't he your modern "Hagler" ?
I’ve never been a fan of Jermall Charlo.
I rarely watch him compete, unless he’s facing an opponent with a pulse.
I have regularly criticised his resume.
However, he’s a better fighter than most of his critics portray him as.
You’ll need to quote my words if you think I’m lying, but you won’t be able to “prove something” that’s never happened!
apollo creed wrote: ↑09 Nov 2021, 12:20Why is not Charlo better than BJS, to earn a shot at Canelo ?
Canelo wanted to unify 168lbs.
Saunders held a title at 168lbs and a decent following in the UK. He had two things to offer Canelo.
Charlo doesn't have a title at 168lbs and doesn't attract sizable audience figures.
Canelo has worn Charlo's WBC middleweight crown on two occasions. He’s already been there, done that and bought the T-shirt!
At some point or other, Canelo (twice), Golovkin (twice), Lemieux, Khurtsidze, Andrade and Eubank Jr. have all previously either declined opportunities to face Saunders or expressed their disinterest in facing the Brit or withdrew from bouts that Billy Joe had signed-up for.
In the last five years, Jermall Charlo has only engaged in four legitimate world title bouts at middleweight. He hasn't done anything else.
He has never competed at 168lbs. Charlo’s entire reputation at 160lbs is built on the Derevyanchenko victory, with the Russian having only won one bout within the last 44 months.
In the last five years, Billy Joe Saunders won three world title bouts at 160lbs and was engaging in his fourth 168lbs world championship fight when he faced Canelo.
This is all basic stuff that you should know.