Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post Reply
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Enlightened-One »

The following lists have been formulated based on the following criteria, and include:

• Next scheduled bout
• Opponents faced for the two years immediately preceding the date of either their next or most recent outing

Canelo:
• Ilunga Makabu (TBC - May 2022)
• Caleb Plant
• Billy Joe Saunders
• Avni Yildirim
• Callum Smith

Artur Beterbiev:
• Marcus Browne
• Adam Deines

Dmitry Bivol:
• Craig Richards
• Lenin Castillo

David Benavidez:
• Kyrone Davis
• Ronald Ellis
• Roamer Alexis Angulo

Jermall Charlo:
• Juan Macias Montiel
• Sergiy Derevyanchenko
• Dennis Hogan
• Brandon Adams

Demetrius Andrade:
• Jason Quigley
• Liam Williams
• Luke Keeler

Gennadiy Golovkin:
• Ryota Murata
• Kamil Szeremeta

Note: None of the names associated with Canelo's rivals included in these lists have ever won a legitimate world title fight.

The purpose of this thread is to understand people’s thoughts about the calibre of opposition Canelo’s biggest rivals have been facing recently and to determine whether they should start fighting each other whilst waiting for their opportunity to face the Mexican superstar.

From my personal perspective, I’d love to see these guys fight each other to earn the right to face Canelo, because it would result in an immediate and dramatic improvement in the general quality of bouts we've recently witnessed, rather than seeing these guys constantly biding time engaging in lacklustre meaningless affairs.

Thoughts? :confused:
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Imagine if these bouts happened?

A) Artur Beterbiev vs. Dmitry Bivol
B) David Benavidez vs. Joe Smith Jr.
C) Jermall Charlo vs. Demetrius Andrade
D) Gennadiy Golovkin vs. Ryota Murata

E) Winner of A vs. Winner of B
F) Winner of C. vs. Winner of D

• Canelo vs. Winner of E
• Canelo vs. Winner of F
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Lackeos »

They probably should try to earn a shot, considering that there's only one Alvarez to go around, and a fight with him is the biggest payday in the game right now. Various fighters at 160 and 168 like Charlo, Andrade, Munguia, and Benavidez are looking like they're going to miss their opportunity entirely if Alvarez permanently migrates to 175+.

However, something that doesn't exist in the business of boxing, and maybe should, is: if two fighters like Charlo and Andrade fight each other in an eliminator to get Alvarez, there should be an agreement between them to split the Alvarez payday. Whether you win the eliminator or not, you make a few million either way. That's the best way to persuade them to fight each other rather than stay undefeated and wait for their number to be called.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by margaret thatcher »

yes they should, 160-175 turned into a bunch of dudes just fighting cans or sitting around in hope of the canelo lottery, step da f@ck up dudes

seriously, have a look at the last opponents these guys fought

dave benavidez: kyrone davis
charlo: juan montiel
bert: adam denies
bivol: craig richards
plant: caleb truax
bjs: martin murray

jesus h christ! what a bunch of nothing. canelo's doing his thing but the rest of the 160-175 divisions have turned dumpy
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by DrDuke »

Those dreams about good matchups are pointless. Many best-vs-best bouts could be made with the rational politics of boxing, but few of them will take place with the actual politics.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Enlightened-One »

DrDuke wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 04:32 Those dreams about good matchups are pointless. Many best-vs-best bouts could be made with the rational politics of boxing, but few of them will take place with the actual politics.
I kind of agree with you there, but isn’t it strange that Canelo is criticised for facing Ilunga Makabu next, because most of the media and fight fans want him to face either David Benavidez or Artur Beterbiev?

But no one seems to criticise the likes of David Benavidez and Artur Beterbiev for facing terribly poor opposition, such as Kyrone Davis and Adam Deines.

It’s kind of weird though, is that the onus is seemingly on Canelo to face all of his rivals, rather than his rivals facing each other to earn the right to fight Canelo?

The media and fans shouldn’t be praising the following match-ups whilst also lambasting Canelo for facing Ilunga Makabu:

• Artur Beterbiev -> Adam Deines
• Dmitry Bivol -> Craig Richards
• David Benavidez -> Kyrone Davis
• Jermall Charlo -> Juan Macias Montiel
• Demetrius Andrade -> Liam Williams
• Gennadiy Golovkin -> Kamil Szeremeta

How can anyone claim Canelo is ducking these guys when you review their most recent wins?

What are they doing to earn the right to engage in marquee bouts? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing!
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by DrDuke »

Enlightened-One wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 04:51
DrDuke wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 04:32 Those dreams about good matchups are pointless. Many best-vs-best bouts could be made with the rational politics of boxing, but few of them will take place with the actual politics.
I kind of agree with you there, but isn’t it strange that Canelo is criticised for facing Ilunga Makabu next, because most of the media and fight fans want him to face either David Benavidez or Artur Beterbiev?

But no one seems to criticise the likes of David Benavidez and Artur Beterbiev for facing terribly poor opposition, such as Kyrone Davis and Adam Deines.

It’s kind of weird though, is that the onus is seemingly on Canelo to face all of his rivals, rather than his rivals facing each other to earn the right to fight Canelo?

The media and fans shouldn’t be praising the following match-ups whilst also lambasting Canelo for facing Ilunga Makabu:

• Artur Beterbiev -> Adam Deines
• Dmitry Bivol -> Craig Richards
• David Benavidez -> Kyrone Davis
• Jermall Charlo -> Juan Macias Montiel
• Demetrius Andrade -> Liam Williams
• Gennadiy Golovkin -> Kamil Szeremeta

How can anyone claim Canelo is ducking these guys when you review their most recent wins?

What are they doing to earn the right to engage in marquee bouts? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing!
Canelo deserves both praise and critics. Yes, it's very good, that he fights often and against the top opposition, but not against the very best, to be fair. Look, he fought Kovalev instead of Bert and Bivol. He unified at the SMW against the likes of Saunders, Plant and Smith, other than in at the MW against the likes of Golovkin and Charlo, or at the LHW against Bivol and Bert again. He chose Makabu for the CW challenge instead of Briedis or Okolie. So, it's possible to blame the likes of Charlo, Bivol, Beterbiev and Golovkin for fighting the lesser opposition and waiting for the Canelo payday, but it's also possible to blame Canelo for giving paydays to good, but not the very best fighters.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Enlightened-One »

DrDuke wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 05:00
Enlightened-One wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 04:51
DrDuke wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 04:32 Those dreams about good matchups are pointless. Many best-vs-best bouts could be made with the rational politics of boxing, but few of them will take place with the actual politics.
I kind of agree with you there, but isn’t it strange that Canelo is criticised for facing Ilunga Makabu next, because most of the media and fight fans want him to face either David Benavidez or Artur Beterbiev?

But no one seems to criticise the likes of David Benavidez and Artur Beterbiev for facing terribly poor opposition, such as Kyrone Davis and Adam Deines.

It’s kind of weird though, is that the onus is seemingly on Canelo to face all of his rivals, rather than his rivals facing each other to earn the right to fight Canelo?

The media and fans shouldn’t be praising the following match-ups whilst also lambasting Canelo for facing Ilunga Makabu:

• Artur Beterbiev -> Adam Deines
• Dmitry Bivol -> Craig Richards
• David Benavidez -> Kyrone Davis
• Jermall Charlo -> Juan Macias Montiel
• Demetrius Andrade -> Liam Williams
• Gennadiy Golovkin -> Kamil Szeremeta

How can anyone claim Canelo is ducking these guys when you review their most recent wins?

What are they doing to earn the right to engage in marquee bouts? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing!
Canelo deserves both praise and critics. Yes, it's very good, that he fights often and against the top opposition, but not against the very best, to be fair. Look, he fought Kovalev instead of Bert and Bivol. He unified at the SMW against the likes of Saunders, Plant and Smith, other than in at the MW against the likes of Golovkin and Charlo, or at the LHW against Bivol and Bert again. He chose Makabu for the CW challenge instead of Briedis or Okolie. So, it's possible to blame the likes of Charlo, Bivol, Beterbiev and Golovkin for fighting the lesser opposition and waiting for the Canelo payday, but it's also possible to blame Canelo for giving paydays to good, but not the very best fighters.
In terms of your general sentiments, I pretty much agree with you, but if I was to nit-pick, there’s one small thing we don’t see eye-to-eye on.

So I guess the conundrum we face is this, when a fighter makes their debut in a new weight class and faces a top three/four world-rated opponent and world champion, should we criticise them for not facing the very best immediately?

I think that’s the only thing we disagree on.

If we review Canelo’s career progression, he has a tendency of testing the waters against top-ten opposition prior to facing the very best in each weight class he’s competed in.

He gradually cleaned-out and became the top-dog at 154lbs, 160lbs and 168lbs. He beat the very best in each of those weight classes, but climbed his way to the top, rather than being dropped off by a helicopter at the very top of the mountain.

Canelo tested the waters at 168lbs against a secondary title holder and top-ten world-rated opponent, Rocky Fielding. And then went on to unify the division.

Canelo has already tested the waters at 175lbs against a legitimate world titleholder and a top-three world-rated opponent, Sergey Kovalev.

Canelo is now testing the waters against a legitimate world titleholder at cruiserweight and another top-three world-rated opponent, Illunga Mukabu.

I think Canelo will make a permanent return to 175lbs and clean out that division, to emulate his feats from 154lbs, 160lbs & 168lbs. He will beat Bivol, Beterbiev and Smith Jr. None of them are better fighters than the guys Canelo has already beaten.

I also feel that people often like to mention names, without considering timelines, because:

• When Canelo engaged in the Daniel Jacobs bout, the Mexican’s final outing at 160lbs, the Miracle Man held a legitimate world title and was universally rated above Charlo (as per The RING, ESPN & TBRB)… and Jermall didn’t even have a title back then. Did you see the Jacobs-Charlo face-off in the corridor?

• David Benavidez has never been considered the best fighter at 168lbs and he also threw away his title twice before Canelo even attempted to unify the division. Benavidez has risen to the top due to a process of elimination, because he hasn’t beaten a single notable name since he was stripped of his titles.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 19 Nov 2021, 06:50, edited 1 time in total.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by DrDuke »

Enlightened-One wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 06:44 If we review Canelo’s career progression, he has a tendency of testing the waters against top-ten opposition prior to facing the very best in each weight class he’s competed in.

He gradually cleaned-out and became the top-dog at 154lbs, 160lbs and 168lbs. He beat the very best in each of those weight classes, but climbed his way to the top, rather than being dropped off by a helicopter at the very top of the mountain.

Canelo tested the waters at 168lbs against a secondary title holder and top-ten world-rated opponent, Rocky Fielding. And then went on to unify the division.

Canelo has already tested the waters at 175lbs against a legitimate world titleholder and a top-three world-rated opponent, Sergey Kovalev.

Canelo is now testing the waters against a legitimate world titleholder at cruiserweight and another top-three world-rated opponent, Illunga Mukabu.

I think Canelo will make a permanent return to 175lbs and clean out that division, to emulate his feats from 154lbs, 160lbs & 168lbs. He will beat Bivol, Beterbiev and Smith Jr. None of them are better fighters than the guys Canelo has already beaten.
If he keeps this up, it'll be great. Untul then his current situation with the LHW and the potential situation with the CW Makabu challenge remains like Roy Jones' HW run, when he grabbed the belt from Ruiz other than Lewis.
adislav123
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1745
Joined: 10 Nov 2012, 19:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by adislav123 »

should've roy took on lennox? would've been a suicidal action.

i just don't think canelo could beat bivol or beterbiev atm. maybe smiith idk, would sure like to see him try!

makabu at 200, which is the weight he got his title at, my money is on makabu in a 'fair fight' at that.

at 190 'wbc new cruiser' plus a shitty rehydration clause, so at 'canelo weight'? idk.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by brilo33 »

id like to see bjs v plant
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by Enlightened-One »

brilo33 wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 20:54 id like to see bjs v plant
Saunders will either retire or be inactive for 18 months.

Billy Joe said he either receives £5m for the Eubank Jr. rematch or he retires.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by brilo33 »

Enlightened-One wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 21:24
brilo33 wrote: 19 Nov 2021, 20:54 id like to see bjs v plant
Saunders will either retire or be inactive for 18 months.

Billy Joe said he either receives £5m for the Eubank Jr. rematch or he retires.
fair dos its fighting williams out injured now, come on bill fill in
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by margaret thatcher »

bjs vs plant - i feel like it would be a total feint fest, with each guy trying to be the one who moves backwards more
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by brilo33 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 20 Nov 2021, 00:43 bjs vs plant - i feel like it would be a total feint fest, with each guy trying to be the one who moves backwards more
haha your such a thug maggie, i bet ur a lenny or pretty boy fan, i dont think it would i think someone would control the centre
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39230
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by margaret thatcher »

i liked floyd, but if you put him in with another floyd, it would be a total sh!t fight

bjs and plant are good boxers, but them vs each other is a nightmare stylistically for me
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by brilo33 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 20 Nov 2021, 00:50 i liked floyd, but if you put him in with another floyd, it would be a total sh!t fight

bjs and plant are good boxers, but them vs each other is a nightmare stylistically for me
i dont agree i think ego brings them out to fight ,especially now they have both lost to saul
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26494
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Should Canelo's rivals fight each other?

Post by KiwiRider »

They are all too smart with their money :lol:
None are hungry enough.

They need to attend the Broner School of Money Management for two terms. Learn 'flushing' & 'unpaid bling' along with 'legal fees' & 'baby mammas' :TU:
Post Reply